Felipe Machado Mota, Marcos Antonio Ferreira Júnior, Christiana Velloso Rebello Hilgert, Oleci Pereira Frota, Isabelle Campos de Azevedo, Viviane Euzébia Pereira Santos, Matilde Delmina da Silva Martins, Gustavo Moura Maidana, Bethânia Karoline Alvaro Menezes, Bruna Dias Abes, Sara Raquel Pinto Borges, Guilherme Parreira Neves
{"title":"Loss of quality of corneas stored in hypothermic preservation media during processing and evaluation in an eye bank: a cohort study.","authors":"Felipe Machado Mota, Marcos Antonio Ferreira Júnior, Christiana Velloso Rebello Hilgert, Oleci Pereira Frota, Isabelle Campos de Azevedo, Viviane Euzébia Pereira Santos, Matilde Delmina da Silva Martins, Gustavo Moura Maidana, Bethânia Karoline Alvaro Menezes, Bruna Dias Abes, Sara Raquel Pinto Borges, Guilherme Parreira Neves","doi":"10.1007/s10561-026-10240-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze factors associated with the loss of quality of corneas stored in hypothermic preservation media during processing and evaluation in an eye bank. A cohort study was conducted using records from 422 donors (844 corneas) between January 1, 2022, and March 31, 2024. Corneal quality was determined through slit-lamp biomicroscopy based on 13 morphological criteria, with tissues classified on a Likert-type scale from 0 (excellent) to 4 (unacceptable). For analysis, corneas were grouped as higher quality (scores 0-2: excellent, good, and fair) and lower quality (scores 3-4: poor and unacceptable). The outcome was defined as progression from higher to lower quality between the first and second evaluations. No statistically significant associations were found between donor clinical or sociodemographic variables and progression to lower quality. The relative risk (RR) of progression to the lower-quality group according to the storage medium (Optisol-GS vs Eusol-C) was low, RR 1.01 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.94 - 1.07), possibly due to the short interval between evaluations (≤ 4 days). However, a significant trend toward higher scores was observed during the second evaluation. These findings suggest that donor characteristics, processing factors, and the preservation medium did not significantly influence the deterioration of corneal quality within the analyzed period. The differences observed between the evaluations are possibly related to the subjective nature of slit-lamp assessment rather than true tissue degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9723,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Tissue Banking","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13400461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Tissue Banking","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-026-10240-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze factors associated with the loss of quality of corneas stored in hypothermic preservation media during processing and evaluation in an eye bank. A cohort study was conducted using records from 422 donors (844 corneas) between January 1, 2022, and March 31, 2024. Corneal quality was determined through slit-lamp biomicroscopy based on 13 morphological criteria, with tissues classified on a Likert-type scale from 0 (excellent) to 4 (unacceptable). For analysis, corneas were grouped as higher quality (scores 0-2: excellent, good, and fair) and lower quality (scores 3-4: poor and unacceptable). The outcome was defined as progression from higher to lower quality between the first and second evaluations. No statistically significant associations were found between donor clinical or sociodemographic variables and progression to lower quality. The relative risk (RR) of progression to the lower-quality group according to the storage medium (Optisol-GS vs Eusol-C) was low, RR 1.01 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.94 - 1.07), possibly due to the short interval between evaluations (≤ 4 days). However, a significant trend toward higher scores was observed during the second evaluation. These findings suggest that donor characteristics, processing factors, and the preservation medium did not significantly influence the deterioration of corneal quality within the analyzed period. The differences observed between the evaluations are possibly related to the subjective nature of slit-lamp assessment rather than true tissue degradation.
本研究旨在分析眼库中保存在低温保存介质中的角膜在处理和评估过程中质量下降的相关因素。一项队列研究使用了2022年1月1日至2024年3月31日期间422名捐赠者(844个角膜)的记录。通过裂隙灯生物显微镜根据13个形态学标准确定角膜质量,组织按likert型评分从0(优秀)到4(不合格)进行分类。为了进行分析,将角膜分为高质量(0-2分:优秀、良好和一般)和低质量(3-4分:差和不可接受)。结果被定义为在第一次和第二次评价之间从高质量到低质量的进展。供体临床或社会人口学变量与供体质量恶化之间没有统计学上的显著关联。根据储存介质(Optisol-GS vs Eusol-C)进展到低质量组的相对风险(RR)较低,RR为1.01(95%可信区间:0.94 - 1.07),可能是由于评估间隔较短(≤4天)。然而,在第二次评估中,观察到一个显著的趋向于更高的分数。这些结果表明,在分析期内,供体特征、处理因素和保存介质对角膜质量的恶化没有显著影响。评估之间观察到的差异可能与缝灯评估的主观性质有关,而不是真正的组织降解。
期刊介绍:
Cell and Tissue Banking provides a forum for disseminating information to scientists and clinicians involved in the banking and transplantation of cells and tissues. Cell and Tissue Banking is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers in the following areas:
basic research concerning general aspects of tissue banking such as quality assurance and control of banked cells/tissues, effects of preservation and sterilisation methods on cells/tissues, biotechnology, etc.; clinical applications of banked cells/tissues; standards of practice in procurement, processing, storage and distribution of cells/tissues; ethical issues; medico-legal issues.