A comparison of in-patient mental health rehabilitation services provided by the NHS and independent sector in England: patient and service characteristics.
Helen Killaspy, Christian Dalton-Locke, Mariam Adeleke, Nia Barber, Bella Branch, Caroline Sarah Clarke, Gerard Leavey, Artemis Igoumenou, Katherine Barrett, Megan Downey, Sophie Thomas, Jing Yi Jessica Weng, Rumana Z Omar
{"title":"A comparison of in-patient mental health rehabilitation services provided by the NHS and independent sector in England: patient and service characteristics.","authors":"Helen Killaspy, Christian Dalton-Locke, Mariam Adeleke, Nia Barber, Bella Branch, Caroline Sarah Clarke, Gerard Leavey, Artemis Igoumenou, Katherine Barrett, Megan Downey, Sophie Thomas, Jing Yi Jessica Weng, Rumana Z Omar","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.12047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-patient mental health rehabilitation services provide specialist care to adults with complex psychosis. In England, there are more than 350 such services, half provided by the National Health Service (NHS) and half by the independent sector.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate whether NHS and independent sector in-patient mental health rehabilitation services differ.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited a random sample of NHS and independent sector services across England. We collected cross-sectional data regarding service and patient characteristics through interviews with patients, clinicians and managers, and from healthcare record reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 411 patients from 48 NHS services and 172 patients from 20 independent sector services. Service characteristics, including standardised quality scores, were similar. Most patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (NHS <i>n</i> = 237, 57.7%; independent sector <i>n</i> = 99, 57.6%) or schizoaffective disorder (NHS <i>n</i> = 88, 21.4%; independent sector <i>n</i> = 32, 18.6%). More than half had at least one comorbid condition, but more independent sector patients had at least two (NHS 131 of 411, 31.9%; independent sector 80 of 172, 46.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.001). Current admissions were twice as long for independent sector patients (NHS mean 1.2 years [s.d. 1.5]; independent sector mean 2.4 years [s.d. 2.8]). Standardised ratings of patients' quality of life, autonomy, time use, satisfaction with care, social and everyday functioning, and challenging behaviours were similar. However, independent sector patients had more needs (NHS mean 6.5 [s.d. 3.2]; independent sector mean 7.9 [s.d. 3.9]; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and more had a history of fire setting (NHS 32, 7.9%; independent sector 28, 17.2%; <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both NHS and independent sector in-patient rehabilitation services support people with complex psychosis, but independent sector patients may have more complex conditions, which could explain their longer admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 4","pages":"e196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13419678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.12047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In-patient mental health rehabilitation services provide specialist care to adults with complex psychosis. In England, there are more than 350 such services, half provided by the National Health Service (NHS) and half by the independent sector.
Aims: To investigate whether NHS and independent sector in-patient mental health rehabilitation services differ.
Method: We recruited a random sample of NHS and independent sector services across England. We collected cross-sectional data regarding service and patient characteristics through interviews with patients, clinicians and managers, and from healthcare record reviews.
Results: We recruited 411 patients from 48 NHS services and 172 patients from 20 independent sector services. Service characteristics, including standardised quality scores, were similar. Most patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (NHS n = 237, 57.7%; independent sector n = 99, 57.6%) or schizoaffective disorder (NHS n = 88, 21.4%; independent sector n = 32, 18.6%). More than half had at least one comorbid condition, but more independent sector patients had at least two (NHS 131 of 411, 31.9%; independent sector 80 of 172, 46.5%; P = 0.001). Current admissions were twice as long for independent sector patients (NHS mean 1.2 years [s.d. 1.5]; independent sector mean 2.4 years [s.d. 2.8]). Standardised ratings of patients' quality of life, autonomy, time use, satisfaction with care, social and everyday functioning, and challenging behaviours were similar. However, independent sector patients had more needs (NHS mean 6.5 [s.d. 3.2]; independent sector mean 7.9 [s.d. 3.9]; P < 0.001) and more had a history of fire setting (NHS 32, 7.9%; independent sector 28, 17.2%; P = 0.001).
Conclusions: Both NHS and independent sector in-patient rehabilitation services support people with complex psychosis, but independent sector patients may have more complex conditions, which could explain their longer admissions.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.