Insecticide regulations need to consider impacts on conservation adoption.

IF 9.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
BioScience Pub Date : 2026-07-02 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1093/biosci/biag062
Tristan A Barley, Lisa A Schulte, Amy L Toth, Matthew O'Neal, Adam G Dolezal
{"title":"Insecticide regulations need to consider impacts on conservation adoption.","authors":"Tristan A Barley, Lisa A Schulte, Amy L Toth, Matthew O'Neal, Adam G Dolezal","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biag062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency implemented a new insecticide strategy requiring site-specific changes to their use. An updated strategy was urgently needed, given the scientific evidence linking pesticides with precipitous declines in pollinators and increasing numbers of insects added to or proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Protecting nonpest insects requires all hands on deck; however, the new strategy threatens to undermine support from a key set of hands: farmers who use pesticides, and who are crucial partners for achieving conservation goals. Care should be taken to align the insecticide strategy with the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), a popular program that provides crucial financial support for farmland owners to voluntarily engage in conservation, including insect conservation. We spotlight the CRP Prairie Strips (CP-43) practice to exemplify problems with the new insecticide strategy and recommendations to improve the policy for both farmers and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9003,"journal":{"name":"BioScience","volume":"76 7","pages":"650-655"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13377639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biag062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency implemented a new insecticide strategy requiring site-specific changes to their use. An updated strategy was urgently needed, given the scientific evidence linking pesticides with precipitous declines in pollinators and increasing numbers of insects added to or proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Protecting nonpest insects requires all hands on deck; however, the new strategy threatens to undermine support from a key set of hands: farmers who use pesticides, and who are crucial partners for achieving conservation goals. Care should be taken to align the insecticide strategy with the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), a popular program that provides crucial financial support for farmland owners to voluntarily engage in conservation, including insect conservation. We spotlight the CRP Prairie Strips (CP-43) practice to exemplify problems with the new insecticide strategy and recommendations to improve the policy for both farmers and the environment.

杀虫剂法规需要考虑对保护性采用的影响。
美国环境保护署实施了一项新的杀虫剂战略,要求根据具体地点改变杀虫剂的使用。鉴于科学证据表明,农药与传粉媒介急剧减少以及被列入或拟列入《濒危物种法》的昆虫数量不断增加有关,因此迫切需要制定一项更新的战略。保护非害虫需要所有人齐心协力;然而,新战略可能会削弱关键群体的支持:使用农药的农民,他们是实现保护目标的关键合作伙伴。应注意将杀虫剂策略与美国农业部保护储备计划(CRP)保持一致,这是一个受欢迎的计划,为农田所有者自愿参与保护提供重要的财政支持,包括昆虫保护。本文重点介绍了CRP草原带(CP-43)的实践,以举例说明新杀虫剂策略存在的问题,并提出了改善农民和环境政策的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioScience
BioScience 生物-生物学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioScience is a monthly journal that has been in publication since 1964. It provides readers with authoritative and current overviews of biological research. The journal is peer-reviewed and heavily cited, making it a reliable source for researchers, educators, and students. In addition to research articles, BioScience also covers topics such as biology education, public policy, history, and the fundamental principles of the biological sciences. This makes the content accessible to a wide range of readers. The journal includes professionally written feature articles that explore the latest advancements in biology. It also features discussions on professional issues, book reviews, news about the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), and columns on policy (Washington Watch) and education (Eye on Education).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书