{"title":"[Clinical application progress, hot topics, controversies and future prospects of segmental metallic ureteral stents].","authors":"Hao Hu, Xiaolong Bian, Tao Xu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ureteral stricture (US) is a common urological disease with complex etiologies, including benign and malignant lesions, iatrogenic injuries, and idiopathic factors. Without timely intervention, it can lead to upper urinary tract obstruction and progressive, irreversible renal impairment. Traditional re-constructive surgeries are often limited by high technical demands, significant surgical risks, and strict requirements for patient fitness. To address these challenges, segmental metallic ureteral stents (SMUSs) have gained prominence in recent years. Featuring a non-full-length design for targeted support, excellent radial strength, and a large caliber, SMUSs provide reliable drainage and allow for long-term retention. They effectively overcome the common drawbacks of traditional double-J stents, such as frequent encrustation, the need for regular replacement, and severe bladder irritation. Consequently, SMUSs have become a vital maintenance therapy for patients with malignant obstructions or those unsuitable for re-constructive surgery. Moreover, they have shown curative potential by providing long-term efficacy for certain benign strictures. However, due to the high heterogeneity of stricture etiologies, significant controversies and knowledge gaps remain in clinical practice. These mainly pertain to the precise selection of stent types for specific indications, the standardization of surgical implantation, optimal indwelling durations, and strategies for preventing and managing long-term complications. Drawing upon the latest global evidence-based medicine and large-sample follow-up data from our center, this article systematically reviews the clinical application and efficacy differences of SMUSs across malignant, benign, and radiotherapy-induced ureteral strictures. We provide an in-depth analysis of major ongoing clinical controversies and propose practical management strategies for complications leading to stent failure, including stent obstruction, migration, encrustation, recurrent infections, and high-risk ureteral fistulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"58 4","pages":"679-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13402088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ureteral stricture (US) is a common urological disease with complex etiologies, including benign and malignant lesions, iatrogenic injuries, and idiopathic factors. Without timely intervention, it can lead to upper urinary tract obstruction and progressive, irreversible renal impairment. Traditional re-constructive surgeries are often limited by high technical demands, significant surgical risks, and strict requirements for patient fitness. To address these challenges, segmental metallic ureteral stents (SMUSs) have gained prominence in recent years. Featuring a non-full-length design for targeted support, excellent radial strength, and a large caliber, SMUSs provide reliable drainage and allow for long-term retention. They effectively overcome the common drawbacks of traditional double-J stents, such as frequent encrustation, the need for regular replacement, and severe bladder irritation. Consequently, SMUSs have become a vital maintenance therapy for patients with malignant obstructions or those unsuitable for re-constructive surgery. Moreover, they have shown curative potential by providing long-term efficacy for certain benign strictures. However, due to the high heterogeneity of stricture etiologies, significant controversies and knowledge gaps remain in clinical practice. These mainly pertain to the precise selection of stent types for specific indications, the standardization of surgical implantation, optimal indwelling durations, and strategies for preventing and managing long-term complications. Drawing upon the latest global evidence-based medicine and large-sample follow-up data from our center, this article systematically reviews the clinical application and efficacy differences of SMUSs across malignant, benign, and radiotherapy-induced ureteral strictures. We provide an in-depth analysis of major ongoing clinical controversies and propose practical management strategies for complications leading to stent failure, including stent obstruction, migration, encrustation, recurrent infections, and high-risk ureteral fistulas.
期刊介绍:
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases.
The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.