Electrostatics and disease: Large-scale assessment of human missense variants causing protein charge alterations and their implications for disease.

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Biophysical journal Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2026.07.023
Nirav Modha, Shailesh Kumar Panday, Emil Alexov
{"title":"Electrostatics and disease: Large-scale assessment of human missense variants causing protein charge alterations and their implications for disease.","authors":"Nirav Modha, Shailesh Kumar Panday, Emil Alexov","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2026.07.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do changes in electrical charge drive protein dysfunction and result in pathogenicity? This study investigates the relationship between charge-altering missense mutations and pathogenicity across a large-scale dataset, the Monogenic Genetic Disorder (MOGEDO) database. Using electrostatic energy calculations, we quantified the shift in interaction energy between the rest of the protein and either the wild-type or mutant residues. Our analysis shows that pathogenic variants are characterized by substantially larger electrostatic perturbations than their benign counterparts. We found that the outcome of a mutation is highly transition specific: because protein interiors tend to maintain a negative electrostatic potential, the introduction of acidic residues creates a destabilizing \"energy penalty.\" Conversely, basic residues often result in stabilizing shifts. Structural context further shaped these effects: buried residues showed larger electrostatic perturbation values overall, and pathogenic variants were enriched at deeply buried sites, consistent with reduced solvent screening amplifying charge perturbations. Because electrostatic interactions contribute substantially to protein binding and molecular recognition, the enrichment of pathogenic variants among binding-associated proteins suggests that electrostatic perturbations may be especially relevant in disease-associated contexts. Complementary analyses showed that pathogenic variants occur at more rigid local sites and are more often located in high-confidence modeled regions and that pathogenic-only genes show stronger gene constraint. This work therefore provides an electrostatics-focused framework for interpreting how charge-altering missense variants disrupt local protein electrostatic environments and how these disruptions are linked to pathogenicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":"4778-4795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2026.07.023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do changes in electrical charge drive protein dysfunction and result in pathogenicity? This study investigates the relationship between charge-altering missense mutations and pathogenicity across a large-scale dataset, the Monogenic Genetic Disorder (MOGEDO) database. Using electrostatic energy calculations, we quantified the shift in interaction energy between the rest of the protein and either the wild-type or mutant residues. Our analysis shows that pathogenic variants are characterized by substantially larger electrostatic perturbations than their benign counterparts. We found that the outcome of a mutation is highly transition specific: because protein interiors tend to maintain a negative electrostatic potential, the introduction of acidic residues creates a destabilizing "energy penalty." Conversely, basic residues often result in stabilizing shifts. Structural context further shaped these effects: buried residues showed larger electrostatic perturbation values overall, and pathogenic variants were enriched at deeply buried sites, consistent with reduced solvent screening amplifying charge perturbations. Because electrostatic interactions contribute substantially to protein binding and molecular recognition, the enrichment of pathogenic variants among binding-associated proteins suggests that electrostatic perturbations may be especially relevant in disease-associated contexts. Complementary analyses showed that pathogenic variants occur at more rigid local sites and are more often located in high-confidence modeled regions and that pathogenic-only genes show stronger gene constraint. This work therefore provides an electrostatics-focused framework for interpreting how charge-altering missense variants disrupt local protein electrostatic environments and how these disruptions are linked to pathogenicity.

静电与疾病:大规模评估引起蛋白质电荷改变的人类错义变异及其对疾病的影响。
电荷的改变是如何驱动蛋白质功能障碍并导致致病性的?本研究通过大规模数据集MOGEDO数据库调查了电荷改变错义突变与致病性之间的关系。利用静电能量计算,我们量化了蛋白质其余部分与野生型或突变残基之间相互作用能的变化。我们的分析表明,致病性变异的特点是比良性变异的静电扰动大得多。我们发现突变的结果是高度过渡特异性的:因为蛋白质内部倾向于保持负静电电位,酸性残基的引入会产生不稳定的“能量惩罚”。相反,碱性残基通常会导致稳定的转变。结构背景进一步塑造了这些影响:掩埋残留物总体上显示出更大的静电扰动值,并且致病变异在深埋部位富集,这与溶剂筛选放大电荷扰动的减少一致。由于静电相互作用对蛋白质结合和分子识别有重要贡献,结合相关蛋白中致病性变异的富集表明,静电扰动可能与疾病相关的环境特别相关。互补分析表明,致病性变异发生在更严格的局部位点,更常位于高置信度的模型区域,仅致病性基因表现出更强的基因约束。因此,这项工作为解释改变电荷的错义变异如何破坏局部蛋白质静电环境以及这些破坏如何与致病性联系提供了一个以静电为重点的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书