{"title":"Electrostatics and disease: Large-scale assessment of human missense variants causing protein charge alterations and their implications for disease.","authors":"Nirav Modha, Shailesh Kumar Panday, Emil Alexov","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2026.07.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do changes in electrical charge drive protein dysfunction and result in pathogenicity? This study investigates the relationship between charge-altering missense mutations and pathogenicity across a large-scale dataset, the Monogenic Genetic Disorder (MOGEDO) database. Using electrostatic energy calculations, we quantified the shift in interaction energy between the rest of the protein and either the wild-type or mutant residues. Our analysis shows that pathogenic variants are characterized by substantially larger electrostatic perturbations than their benign counterparts. We found that the outcome of a mutation is highly transition specific: because protein interiors tend to maintain a negative electrostatic potential, the introduction of acidic residues creates a destabilizing \"energy penalty.\" Conversely, basic residues often result in stabilizing shifts. Structural context further shaped these effects: buried residues showed larger electrostatic perturbation values overall, and pathogenic variants were enriched at deeply buried sites, consistent with reduced solvent screening amplifying charge perturbations. Because electrostatic interactions contribute substantially to protein binding and molecular recognition, the enrichment of pathogenic variants among binding-associated proteins suggests that electrostatic perturbations may be especially relevant in disease-associated contexts. Complementary analyses showed that pathogenic variants occur at more rigid local sites and are more often located in high-confidence modeled regions and that pathogenic-only genes show stronger gene constraint. This work therefore provides an electrostatics-focused framework for interpreting how charge-altering missense variants disrupt local protein electrostatic environments and how these disruptions are linked to pathogenicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":"4778-4795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2026.07.023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
How do changes in electrical charge drive protein dysfunction and result in pathogenicity? This study investigates the relationship between charge-altering missense mutations and pathogenicity across a large-scale dataset, the Monogenic Genetic Disorder (MOGEDO) database. Using electrostatic energy calculations, we quantified the shift in interaction energy between the rest of the protein and either the wild-type or mutant residues. Our analysis shows that pathogenic variants are characterized by substantially larger electrostatic perturbations than their benign counterparts. We found that the outcome of a mutation is highly transition specific: because protein interiors tend to maintain a negative electrostatic potential, the introduction of acidic residues creates a destabilizing "energy penalty." Conversely, basic residues often result in stabilizing shifts. Structural context further shaped these effects: buried residues showed larger electrostatic perturbation values overall, and pathogenic variants were enriched at deeply buried sites, consistent with reduced solvent screening amplifying charge perturbations. Because electrostatic interactions contribute substantially to protein binding and molecular recognition, the enrichment of pathogenic variants among binding-associated proteins suggests that electrostatic perturbations may be especially relevant in disease-associated contexts. Complementary analyses showed that pathogenic variants occur at more rigid local sites and are more often located in high-confidence modeled regions and that pathogenic-only genes show stronger gene constraint. This work therefore provides an electrostatics-focused framework for interpreting how charge-altering missense variants disrupt local protein electrostatic environments and how these disruptions are linked to pathogenicity.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.