Ezekiel Ahn, Seunghyun Lim, Insuck Baek, Moon S. Kim, Sunchung Park, Lyndel W. Meinhardt
{"title":"An information-geometric framework reveals size-dominant and context-dependent stomatal perturbations in cacao under pathogen challenge","authors":"Ezekiel Ahn, Seunghyun Lim, Insuck Baek, Moon S. Kim, Sunchung Park, Lyndel W. Meinhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.stress.2026.101470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comparing stomatal responses across heterogeneous settings is difficult because host, environment, and pathogen effects are often entangled. Here, we developed a control-anchored, information-geometric framework to quantify pathogen-associated perturbations using 7558 cacao (<em>Theobroma cacao</em>) stomata across two genotypes, multiple isolates, two photoperiods, and three time points. By anchoring each infected condition to its strictly matched trial control, we partitioned seven morphometric traits into size and shape modules. Responses were quantified using module-response norms, Gaussian 2-Wasserstein divergence, vector alignment to light/time reference axes derived from matched controls, and leave-one-trial-out robustness procedures. Across the state space, size-related responses exhibited a broader dynamic range than shape-related responses, indicating that pathogen-induced perturbations shift stomatal scale more than geometric balance. The module-response landscape revealed strong genotype- and photoperiod-specific organization, with SCA6 conditions showing larger size-axis displacements than corresponding Pound7 conditions. Alignment analysis demonstrated that pathogen-response vectors do not converge on a universal control-derived light/time direction; instead, their orientations are highly context-dependent. Replicate-aware analysis confirmed that these response patterns are reproducible, although stability varies across contexts. Overall, these results map a structured but context-dependent landscape of stomatal responses and provide a practical framework for prioritizing plant–microbe interactions for future physiological and molecular investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34736,"journal":{"name":"Plant Stress","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101470"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X26002526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Comparing stomatal responses across heterogeneous settings is difficult because host, environment, and pathogen effects are often entangled. Here, we developed a control-anchored, information-geometric framework to quantify pathogen-associated perturbations using 7558 cacao (Theobroma cacao) stomata across two genotypes, multiple isolates, two photoperiods, and three time points. By anchoring each infected condition to its strictly matched trial control, we partitioned seven morphometric traits into size and shape modules. Responses were quantified using module-response norms, Gaussian 2-Wasserstein divergence, vector alignment to light/time reference axes derived from matched controls, and leave-one-trial-out robustness procedures. Across the state space, size-related responses exhibited a broader dynamic range than shape-related responses, indicating that pathogen-induced perturbations shift stomatal scale more than geometric balance. The module-response landscape revealed strong genotype- and photoperiod-specific organization, with SCA6 conditions showing larger size-axis displacements than corresponding Pound7 conditions. Alignment analysis demonstrated that pathogen-response vectors do not converge on a universal control-derived light/time direction; instead, their orientations are highly context-dependent. Replicate-aware analysis confirmed that these response patterns are reproducible, although stability varies across contexts. Overall, these results map a structured but context-dependent landscape of stomatal responses and provide a practical framework for prioritizing plant–microbe interactions for future physiological and molecular investigation.
期刊介绍:
The journal Plant Stress deals with plant (or other photoautotrophs, such as algae, cyanobacteria and lichens) responses to abiotic and biotic stress factors that can result in limited growth and productivity. Such responses can be analyzed and described at a physiological, biochemical and molecular level. Experimental approaches/technologies aiming to improve growth and productivity with a potential for downstream validation under stress conditions will also be considered. Both fundamental and applied research manuscripts are welcome, provided that clear mechanistic hypotheses are made and descriptive approaches are avoided. In addition, high-quality review articles will also be considered, provided they follow a critical approach and stimulate thought for future research avenues.
Plant Stress welcomes high-quality manuscripts related (but not limited) to interactions between plants and:
Lack of water (drought) and excess (flooding),
Salinity stress,
Elevated temperature and/or low temperature (chilling and freezing),
Hypoxia and/or anoxia,
Mineral nutrient excess and/or deficiency,
Heavy metals and/or metalloids,
Plant priming (chemical, biological, physiological, nanomaterial, biostimulant) approaches for improved stress protection,
Viral, phytoplasma, bacterial and fungal plant-pathogen interactions.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research articles, as well as review articles and short communications. All submitted manuscripts will be subject to a thorough peer-reviewing process.