Metabolic network homeostasis and antagonistic stress response drive rootstock-mediated tolerance to combined salinity and water-deficit in grapevine cv. Syrah
{"title":"Metabolic network homeostasis and antagonistic stress response drive rootstock-mediated tolerance to combined salinity and water-deficit in grapevine cv. Syrah","authors":"Kidanemaryam Reta, Yaniv Lupo, Noga Sikron-Persi, Tania Acuña, Naftali Lazarovitch, Aaron Fait","doi":"10.1016/j.stress.2026.101456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water deficit and salinity are major stresses that rarely occur in isolation, yet their combined effects on grapevine remain poorly understood. In a 3-year study, we dissected the response of <em>Vitis vinifera cv.</em> Syrah, a cultivar known for its sensitivity to water-deficit and salinity stress, grafted onto 1103 Paulsen (PL1103) and Sélection Oppenheim 4 (SO4) rootstocks to salinity (2.5 dS m<sup>−1</sup>) combined with irrigation regimes (66%, 100%, and 133% of control). Water availability primarily defined physiological responses, with subtle rootstock-specific differences. Under water deficit, both rootstocks exhibited substantial physiological impairment (stem water potential < −2.0 MPa, leaf relative water content < 75%, and reduced stomatal conductance). In contrast, salinity induced ion imbalance, with superior Cl⁻ exclusion in SO4-grafts conferring improved physiological performance. Using a comparative framework classifying interactions as additive, synergistic, or antagonistic, we found that SO4-grafts employ an antagonistic mitigation strategy, whereas PL1103-grafts engage in synergistic amplification of stress impacts. This was reflected in a 28% yield advantage of SO4-grafts under combined stress. Central metabolite profiling revealed rootstock-specific divergence. PL1103-grafts displayed condition-driven alterations (up to ±10-fold) in the accumulation of osmoprotective amino acids (proline and GABA) and sugars (glucose and fructose), whereas SO4-grafts showed phenologically regulated, homeostatic stability. Network analysis suggests that tolerance is driven by reduced network connectivity of metabolic architecture rather than increased levels of a few metabolites. Less perturbed network in SO4 (edges reduced from 194 to 168) reflected SO4-grafts’ resilience. Conversely, PL1103-grafts exhibited network expansion under salinity, with increased connectivity from 196 to 267 edges and centrality, indicative of heightened stress perception. Overall, rootstocks appear to actively modulate scion resource allocation rather than passively buffering stress, likely through long-distance signals across the graft union.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34736,"journal":{"name":"Plant Stress","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101456"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X26002381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water deficit and salinity are major stresses that rarely occur in isolation, yet their combined effects on grapevine remain poorly understood. In a 3-year study, we dissected the response of Vitis vinifera cv. Syrah, a cultivar known for its sensitivity to water-deficit and salinity stress, grafted onto 1103 Paulsen (PL1103) and Sélection Oppenheim 4 (SO4) rootstocks to salinity (2.5 dS m−1) combined with irrigation regimes (66%, 100%, and 133% of control). Water availability primarily defined physiological responses, with subtle rootstock-specific differences. Under water deficit, both rootstocks exhibited substantial physiological impairment (stem water potential < −2.0 MPa, leaf relative water content < 75%, and reduced stomatal conductance). In contrast, salinity induced ion imbalance, with superior Cl⁻ exclusion in SO4-grafts conferring improved physiological performance. Using a comparative framework classifying interactions as additive, synergistic, or antagonistic, we found that SO4-grafts employ an antagonistic mitigation strategy, whereas PL1103-grafts engage in synergistic amplification of stress impacts. This was reflected in a 28% yield advantage of SO4-grafts under combined stress. Central metabolite profiling revealed rootstock-specific divergence. PL1103-grafts displayed condition-driven alterations (up to ±10-fold) in the accumulation of osmoprotective amino acids (proline and GABA) and sugars (glucose and fructose), whereas SO4-grafts showed phenologically regulated, homeostatic stability. Network analysis suggests that tolerance is driven by reduced network connectivity of metabolic architecture rather than increased levels of a few metabolites. Less perturbed network in SO4 (edges reduced from 194 to 168) reflected SO4-grafts’ resilience. Conversely, PL1103-grafts exhibited network expansion under salinity, with increased connectivity from 196 to 267 edges and centrality, indicative of heightened stress perception. Overall, rootstocks appear to actively modulate scion resource allocation rather than passively buffering stress, likely through long-distance signals across the graft union.
期刊介绍:
The journal Plant Stress deals with plant (or other photoautotrophs, such as algae, cyanobacteria and lichens) responses to abiotic and biotic stress factors that can result in limited growth and productivity. Such responses can be analyzed and described at a physiological, biochemical and molecular level. Experimental approaches/technologies aiming to improve growth and productivity with a potential for downstream validation under stress conditions will also be considered. Both fundamental and applied research manuscripts are welcome, provided that clear mechanistic hypotheses are made and descriptive approaches are avoided. In addition, high-quality review articles will also be considered, provided they follow a critical approach and stimulate thought for future research avenues.
Plant Stress welcomes high-quality manuscripts related (but not limited) to interactions between plants and:
Lack of water (drought) and excess (flooding),
Salinity stress,
Elevated temperature and/or low temperature (chilling and freezing),
Hypoxia and/or anoxia,
Mineral nutrient excess and/or deficiency,
Heavy metals and/or metalloids,
Plant priming (chemical, biological, physiological, nanomaterial, biostimulant) approaches for improved stress protection,
Viral, phytoplasma, bacterial and fungal plant-pathogen interactions.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research articles, as well as review articles and short communications. All submitted manuscripts will be subject to a thorough peer-reviewing process.