Concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with heart failure.

Reza Khademi, Saeed Shoar
{"title":"Concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with heart failure.","authors":"Reza Khademi, Saeed Shoar","doi":"10.1186/s40842-026-00319-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a major cardiovascular complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) both improve cardiovascular outcomes, but their comparative roles in HF and the potential value of combination therapy remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>SGLT2 inhibitors consistently reduce HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death across the spectrum of ejection fraction, with relative risk reductions of approximately 30-37% (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.63-0.70). In contrast, GLP-1 receptor agonists have a more modest effect on HF hospitalization (approximately 11% risk reduction; HR 0.89) while primarily reducing atherosclerotic cardiovascular events and supporting weight and metabolic control. Mechanistically, SGLT2 inhibitors act predominantly through hemodynamic and cardiorenal pathways, whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists exert metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atherosclerotic effects, providing a rationale for potential complementarity. Emerging data from meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and observational studies suggest possible additive benefits of combination therapy; however, most evidence is indirect and not derived from dedicated randomized heart failure trials. Safety data indicate no major excess risk with combination therapy, although gastrointestinal effects and class-specific adverse events remain relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SGLT2 inhibitors are established therapies for reducing HF outcomes, whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists primarily address cardiometabolic risk with uncertain direct HF benefit. Combination therapy is mechanistically plausible but remains insufficiently supported by dedicated randomized evidence in HF populations. Further prospective trials are required to define its clinical role.</p>","PeriodicalId":521069,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13393864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-026-00319-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major cardiovascular complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) both improve cardiovascular outcomes, but their comparative roles in HF and the potential value of combination therapy remain uncertain.

Main body: SGLT2 inhibitors consistently reduce HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death across the spectrum of ejection fraction, with relative risk reductions of approximately 30-37% (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.63-0.70). In contrast, GLP-1 receptor agonists have a more modest effect on HF hospitalization (approximately 11% risk reduction; HR 0.89) while primarily reducing atherosclerotic cardiovascular events and supporting weight and metabolic control. Mechanistically, SGLT2 inhibitors act predominantly through hemodynamic and cardiorenal pathways, whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists exert metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atherosclerotic effects, providing a rationale for potential complementarity. Emerging data from meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and observational studies suggest possible additive benefits of combination therapy; however, most evidence is indirect and not derived from dedicated randomized heart failure trials. Safety data indicate no major excess risk with combination therapy, although gastrointestinal effects and class-specific adverse events remain relevant.

Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors are established therapies for reducing HF outcomes, whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists primarily address cardiometabolic risk with uncertain direct HF benefit. Combination therapy is mechanistically plausible but remains insufficiently supported by dedicated randomized evidence in HF populations. Further prospective trials are required to define its clinical role.

心衰患者同时使用SGLT2抑制剂和GLP-1受体激动剂
背景:心力衰竭(HF)是2型糖尿病(T2DM)的主要心血管并发症。钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)都能改善心血管预后,但它们在心衰中的比较作用和联合治疗的潜在价值仍不确定。主体:SGLT2抑制剂在射血分数范围内持续降低HF住院率和心血管死亡,相对风险降低约30-37%(危险比(HR) 0.63-0.70)。相比之下,GLP-1受体激动剂对心衰住院的影响较为温和(约降低11%的风险;HR 0.89),而主要是减少动脉粥样硬化性心血管事件和支持体重和代谢控制。从机制上讲,SGLT2抑制剂主要通过血流动力学和心肾途径起作用,而GLP-1受体激动剂发挥代谢、抗炎和抗动脉粥样硬化作用,为潜在的互补提供了基本原理。来自荟萃分析、亚组分析和观察性研究的新数据表明,联合治疗可能有附加益处;然而,大多数证据是间接的,而不是来自专门的随机心力衰竭试验。安全性数据表明,联合治疗没有主要的过度风险,尽管胃肠道效应和特定类别的不良事件仍然相关。结论:SGLT2抑制剂是降低HF结局的既定治疗方法,而GLP-1受体激动剂主要解决心脏代谢风险,对HF的直接益处不确定。联合治疗在机理上是合理的,但在心衰人群中仍缺乏专门的随机证据支持。需要进一步的前瞻性试验来确定其临床作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书