Patient autonomy in advance care planning for Parkinson's disease: Systematic review with narrative synthesis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Evie Z Bouma, Jan W Schoones, Ad A Kaptein, Barend W Florijn
{"title":"Patient autonomy in advance care planning for Parkinson's disease: Systematic review with narrative synthesis.","authors":"Evie Z Bouma, Jan W Schoones, Ad A Kaptein, Barend W Florijn","doi":"10.1017/S1478951526103277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) often experience delays in initiating advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care (PC) which can impact their autonomy as cognitive function declines. Because patient autonomy and decision-making in ACP and PC for individuals with PD is insufficiently explored, this systematic review with narrative synthesis aims to fill this gap by reviewing the existing literature on these topics. It examines how awareness and timing influences ACP and PC implementation, how illness narratives shape decision-making and autonomy perceptions and the roles of caregivers and neurologists in supporting patient autonomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of original research investigating ACP and PC in individuals with PD in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists. Illness narrative types were categorized according to Arthur W. Frank's framework (chaos, restitution and quest narratives). Findings were synthesized narratively and organized thematically in line with the review objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 42 studies using quantitative and qualitative methodologies involving 4154 individuals with PD and 2191 caregivers. Several themes were identified. Limited knowledge of ACP and PC explained its lower occurrence. ACP is often delayed due to uncertainty and misconceptions leading to late or crisis-driven discussions. Narrative medicine shows most individuals with PD share chaos narratives reflecting a focus on motor symptoms over autonomy. Lastly, individuals with PD expressed a need for greater autonomy support while ACP counseling is well received and improves understanding of care needs and end-of-life decisions.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Delays in initiating ACP and PC are associated with diminished autonomy in individuals with PD. Narrative medicine could help neurologists start ACP and PC discussions earlier, supporting autonomy and thereby aligning care with patient preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"24 ","pages":"e204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13430485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951526103277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) often experience delays in initiating advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care (PC) which can impact their autonomy as cognitive function declines. Because patient autonomy and decision-making in ACP and PC for individuals with PD is insufficiently explored, this systematic review with narrative synthesis aims to fill this gap by reviewing the existing literature on these topics. It examines how awareness and timing influences ACP and PC implementation, how illness narratives shape decision-making and autonomy perceptions and the roles of caregivers and neurologists in supporting patient autonomy.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of original research investigating ACP and PC in individuals with PD in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists. Illness narrative types were categorized according to Arthur W. Frank's framework (chaos, restitution and quest narratives). Findings were synthesized narratively and organized thematically in line with the review objectives.

Results: We included 42 studies using quantitative and qualitative methodologies involving 4154 individuals with PD and 2191 caregivers. Several themes were identified. Limited knowledge of ACP and PC explained its lower occurrence. ACP is often delayed due to uncertainty and misconceptions leading to late or crisis-driven discussions. Narrative medicine shows most individuals with PD share chaos narratives reflecting a focus on motor symptoms over autonomy. Lastly, individuals with PD expressed a need for greater autonomy support while ACP counseling is well received and improves understanding of care needs and end-of-life decisions.

Significance of results: Delays in initiating ACP and PC are associated with diminished autonomy in individuals with PD. Narrative medicine could help neurologists start ACP and PC discussions earlier, supporting autonomy and thereby aligning care with patient preferences.

帕金森病患者自主提前护理计划:系统综述与叙事综合。
目的:帕金森病(PD)患者在启动预先护理计划(ACP)和姑息治疗(PC)时经常会遇到延迟,这可能会影响他们的自主性,因为认知功能下降。由于PD患者在ACP和PC中的患者自主和决策尚未得到充分的探讨,因此本文采用叙述性综合的系统综述旨在通过回顾这些主题的现有文献来填补这一空白。它研究了意识和时机如何影响ACP和PC的实施,疾病叙述如何塑造决策和自主感知,以及护理人员和神经科医生在支持患者自主方面的作用。方法:我们按照PRISMA指南对PD患者的ACP和PC进行了系统综述,并对原始研究进行了叙述性综合。纳入研究的方法学质量使用关键评估技能计划检查表进行评估。疾病叙事类型根据Arthur W. Frank的框架(混乱叙事、恢复叙事和探索叙事)进行分类。研究结果以叙述的方式进行综合,并根据审查目标按主题组织。结果:我们纳入了42项研究,采用定量和定性方法,涉及4154名PD患者和2191名护理人员。确定了几个主题。对ACP和PC知识的有限解释了其发生率较低。由于不确定性和误解导致讨论延迟或危机驱动,ACP经常被推迟。叙事医学显示,大多数PD患者都有混乱的叙事,反映出他们对运动症状的关注超过了自主性。最后,PD患者表示需要更大的自主性支持,而ACP咨询很受欢迎,并提高了对护理需求和临终决定的理解。结果的意义:延迟启动ACP和PC与PD患者自主性下降有关。叙事医学可以帮助神经科医生更早地开始ACP和PC的讨论,支持自主权,从而使护理与患者的偏好保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书