Selective use of dynamic navigation for anatomically challenging immediate loading of all-on-four implants: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
European Oral Research Pub Date : 2026-06-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.26650/eor.20261864559
Karen Supply, Simon Corthals, Araceli Diez-Fraile
{"title":"Selective use of dynamic navigation for anatomically challenging immediate loading of all-on-four implants: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Karen Supply, Simon Corthals, Araceli Diez-Fraile","doi":"10.26650/eor.20261864559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Edentulism compromises oral function and quality of life. The All-on-4 concept offers a fixed alternative to conventional dentures under immediate loading. However, evidence on outcomes in anatomically challenging arches, particularly with dynamic navigation, remains limited. This study reports early clinical and radiographic outcomes, and the feasibility, of immediate-loading all-on-4 in a real-world setting using an anatomy-driven allocation strategy with freehand and navigation workflows.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort included consecutive patients treated between November 2023 and February 2025. Dynamic navigation was selectively applied in unfavorable arches; freehand surgery was used otherwise. Four implants per arch supported screw-retained provisional prostheses delivered within 24-36 hours. Primary outcomes were implant and arch-level survival and marginal bone level (MBL) change. Secondary outcomes included complications and provisional prosthesis survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (23 arches; 92 implants) were analyzed: 13 arches freehand and 10 navigation. Median follow-up was 5.11 months. Five implants failed (5.43%), all in the maxilla, affecting four arches (one navigation, three freehand). Implant survival was 94.23% (freehand) and 95.00% (navigation). MBL change was negligible, consistent with early remodeling and measurement variability. Biological complications occurred in 8 implants (8.70%), and two provisional fractures were repaired; 22 of 23 prostheses remained functional (95.65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate-loading All-on-4 with selective navigation achieved high short-term implant and prosthesis survival and minimal MBL variation. These findings support the feasibility of navigation in demanding arches in routine practice, warranting confirmation in prospective studies with longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"328-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13390091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20261864559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Edentulism compromises oral function and quality of life. The All-on-4 concept offers a fixed alternative to conventional dentures under immediate loading. However, evidence on outcomes in anatomically challenging arches, particularly with dynamic navigation, remains limited. This study reports early clinical and radiographic outcomes, and the feasibility, of immediate-loading all-on-4 in a real-world setting using an anatomy-driven allocation strategy with freehand and navigation workflows.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort included consecutive patients treated between November 2023 and February 2025. Dynamic navigation was selectively applied in unfavorable arches; freehand surgery was used otherwise. Four implants per arch supported screw-retained provisional prostheses delivered within 24-36 hours. Primary outcomes were implant and arch-level survival and marginal bone level (MBL) change. Secondary outcomes included complications and provisional prosthesis survival.

Results: Twenty-two patients (23 arches; 92 implants) were analyzed: 13 arches freehand and 10 navigation. Median follow-up was 5.11 months. Five implants failed (5.43%), all in the maxilla, affecting four arches (one navigation, three freehand). Implant survival was 94.23% (freehand) and 95.00% (navigation). MBL change was negligible, consistent with early remodeling and measurement variability. Biological complications occurred in 8 implants (8.70%), and two provisional fractures were repaired; 22 of 23 prostheses remained functional (95.65%).

Conclusion: Immediate-loading All-on-4 with selective navigation achieved high short-term implant and prosthesis survival and minimal MBL variation. These findings support the feasibility of navigation in demanding arches in routine practice, warranting confirmation in prospective studies with longer follow-up.

选择性使用动态导航在解剖学上具有挑战性的全上四种植体即刻加载:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:蛀牙症损害口腔功能和生活质量。All-on-4的概念提供了一个固定的替代传统义齿在即时加载。然而,关于解剖学上具有挑战性的弓的结果,特别是动态导航的证据仍然有限。本研究报告了早期临床和放射学结果,以及在现实环境中使用解剖学驱动的分配策略与徒手和导航工作流程立即加载all-on-4的可行性。材料和方法:该回顾性队列包括2023年11月至2025年2月期间连续治疗的患者。不利拱有选择地采用动力导航;徒手手术则不然。在24-36小时内,每个弓支撑螺钉保留的临时假体提供4个种植体。主要结果是种植体和弓水平的生存和边缘骨水平(MBL)的变化。次要结局包括并发症和临时假体存活。结果:分析了22例患者(23个弓,92个种植体):13例徒手弓,10例导航弓。中位随访时间为5.11个月。5例种植失败(5.43%),均在上颌骨,影响4个弓(1个导航弓,3个徒手弓)。徒手种植体成活率为94.23%,导航种植体成活率为95.00%。MBL变化可忽略不计,与早期重塑和测量变异性一致。发生生物学并发症8例(8.70%),暂时性骨折2例修复;23个假体中有22个仍保持功能(95.65%)。结论:选择导航的即刻加载All-on-4具有较高的短期种植体和假体存活率和最小的MBL变异。这些发现支持在常规实践中对高要求弓进行导航的可行性,并保证在长期随访的前瞻性研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书