What might Confucius say? Digital doppelgängers for people who are newly dead, dying, or comatose.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-07-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2026.2699487
Nancy S Jecker, Jing-Bao Nie, Anita Ho
{"title":"What might Confucius say? Digital doppelgängers for people who are newly dead, dying, or comatose.","authors":"Nancy S Jecker, Jing-Bao Nie, Anita Ho","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2026.2699487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper explores what Confucius might say about the use of generative AI-based digital doppelgängers in healthcare for patients who are newly dead, dying, or comatose. We focus on the use of these technologies to support patients' family members, loved ones, and surrogate decision-makers. Since Confucian approaches are largely missing from bioethics discussions of AI-based digital doppelgängers and patient preference predictors, this paper helps to fill an important gap. Section I introduces three cases involving digital doppelgängers representing people who are newly dead, dying, or comatose. Section II considers a Confucian response to the three cases. Section III applies Confucian values to a further situation, where the digital doppelgänger for a comatose patient functions as a patient preference predictor helping with a surrogate decision for a comatose patient. Section IV sets forth ethical benchmarks for using digital doppelgängers in healthcare. Section V recommends proceeding with caution and highlights the importance of further understanding the benefits and risks of using these tools in diverse cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"37 1","pages":"2699487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13390177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2026.2699487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores what Confucius might say about the use of generative AI-based digital doppelgängers in healthcare for patients who are newly dead, dying, or comatose. We focus on the use of these technologies to support patients' family members, loved ones, and surrogate decision-makers. Since Confucian approaches are largely missing from bioethics discussions of AI-based digital doppelgängers and patient preference predictors, this paper helps to fill an important gap. Section I introduces three cases involving digital doppelgängers representing people who are newly dead, dying, or comatose. Section II considers a Confucian response to the three cases. Section III applies Confucian values to a further situation, where the digital doppelgänger for a comatose patient functions as a patient preference predictor helping with a surrogate decision for a comatose patient. Section IV sets forth ethical benchmarks for using digital doppelgängers in healthcare. Section V recommends proceeding with caution and highlights the importance of further understanding the benefits and risks of using these tools in diverse cultural contexts.

孔子会怎么说呢?数字doppelgängers为那些刚刚死亡,垂死或昏迷的人。
本文探讨了孔子关于在医疗保健中使用基于生成人工智能的数字doppelgängers对新死亡、垂死或昏迷患者的看法。我们专注于使用这些技术来支持患者的家庭成员、亲人和替代决策者。由于儒家方法在基于人工智能的数字doppelgängers和患者偏好预测的生物伦理学讨论中基本上缺失,本文有助于填补一个重要的空白。第一部分介绍了三个涉及数字doppelgängers的案例,这些案例代表了刚刚死亡、即将死亡或处于昏迷状态的人。第二节考虑儒家对这三个案例的回应。第三部分将儒家价值观应用于进一步的情况,其中昏迷患者的数字doppelgänger作为患者偏好预测器,帮助昏迷患者做出替代决定。第四节规定了在医疗保健中使用数字doppelgängers的道德基准。第五节建议谨慎行事,并强调进一步了解在不同文化背景下使用这些工具的好处和风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书