Smartphone-Assisted CSCTAS-Derived Sperm Kinematics and Clinical Pregnancy after Intrauterine Insemination in a Turkish Cohort of Couples with Unexplained Infertility.
Esra Selvi, Ayşe Altun Akpınar, Yeşim Erkan, Hamza Osman İlhan, Nizamettin Aydın, Özlem Dural, Necip Erkut Attar
{"title":"Smartphone-Assisted CSCTAS-Derived Sperm Kinematics and Clinical Pregnancy after Intrauterine Insemination in a Turkish Cohort of Couples with Unexplained Infertility.","authors":"Esra Selvi, Ayşe Altun Akpınar, Yeşim Erkan, Hamza Osman İlhan, Nizamettin Aydın, Özlem Dural, Necip Erkut Attar","doi":"10.1007/s43032-026-02165-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional semen analysis provides limited information on sperm kinematic behavior in couples with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). We used a laboratory based, microscope mounted smartphone-assisted Computerized Sperm Counting and Tracking Analysis System (CSCTAS) to characterize sperm kinematics in prepared samples and compare them by ultrasound-confirmed clinical pregnancy after IUI. In this retrospective single-center Turkish cohort, 184 first IUI cycles between January 2018 and December 2019 were analyzed. Prepared samples were assessed under standardized Makler chamber conditions. Manual-CSCTAS agreement for total motility was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis, and single-variable receiver operating characteristic analyses were supplementary. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 29 cycles (15.8%). Pre- and post-preparation semen parameters were similar between groups. Mean CSCTAS-derived wobble (WOB) was higher in pregnancy-positive cycles (0.83 ± 0.03 vs. 0.81 ± 0.09; p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.24), whereas beat-cross frequency (BCF) was lower at the nominal level (7.28 ± 0.70 vs. 7.61 ± 1.05 Hz; p = 0.039; d = - 0.33). Although statistically significant, the differences had small effect sizes. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of - 3.44% points, 95% limits of agreement of - 24.69 to 17.81, and proportional bias. Single-variable area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.526 for WOB and 0.555 for BCF, and both 95% confidence intervals included 0.50. These findings suggest exploratory population-level digital motility signals; however, the small effect sizes and near-chance single-variable AUC values indicate limited predictive performance and do not support their use as standalone predictors of individual IUI outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1687-1699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-026-02165-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Conventional semen analysis provides limited information on sperm kinematic behavior in couples with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). We used a laboratory based, microscope mounted smartphone-assisted Computerized Sperm Counting and Tracking Analysis System (CSCTAS) to characterize sperm kinematics in prepared samples and compare them by ultrasound-confirmed clinical pregnancy after IUI. In this retrospective single-center Turkish cohort, 184 first IUI cycles between January 2018 and December 2019 were analyzed. Prepared samples were assessed under standardized Makler chamber conditions. Manual-CSCTAS agreement for total motility was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis, and single-variable receiver operating characteristic analyses were supplementary. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 29 cycles (15.8%). Pre- and post-preparation semen parameters were similar between groups. Mean CSCTAS-derived wobble (WOB) was higher in pregnancy-positive cycles (0.83 ± 0.03 vs. 0.81 ± 0.09; p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.24), whereas beat-cross frequency (BCF) was lower at the nominal level (7.28 ± 0.70 vs. 7.61 ± 1.05 Hz; p = 0.039; d = - 0.33). Although statistically significant, the differences had small effect sizes. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of - 3.44% points, 95% limits of agreement of - 24.69 to 17.81, and proportional bias. Single-variable area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.526 for WOB and 0.555 for BCF, and both 95% confidence intervals included 0.50. These findings suggest exploratory population-level digital motility signals; however, the small effect sizes and near-chance single-variable AUC values indicate limited predictive performance and do not support their use as standalone predictors of individual IUI outcome.
传统的精液分析对不明原因不孕夫妇进行宫内人工授精(IUI)的精子运动行为提供了有限的信息。我们使用基于实验室、安装在显微镜上的智能手机辅助计算机精子计数和跟踪分析系统(CSCTAS)来表征制备样品中的精子运动学,并通过超声确认的IUI后临床妊娠进行比较。在这个回顾性的单中心土耳其队列中,分析了2018年1月至2019年12月期间184个首次IUI周期。制备的样品在标准化的马克勒室条件下进行评估。通过Bland-Altman分析评估Manual-CSCTAS对总运动性的一致性,并补充单变量受试者工作特征分析。临床妊娠发生29个周期(15.8%)。各组制备前后精液参数相似。在妊娠阳性周期中,平均cscas衍生的摆动(WOB)较高(0.83±0.03 vs. 0.81±0.09;p = 0.004; Cohen’s d = 0.24),而在名义水平上,热交叉频率(BCF)较低(7.28±0.70 vs. 7.61±1.05 Hz; p = 0.039; d = - 0.33)。虽然具有统计学意义,但差异的效应很小。Bland-Altman分析显示平均偏倚为- 3.44%,95%的一致性限为- 24.69 ~ 17.81,存在比例偏倚。单变量曲线下面积(AUC)值WOB为0.526,BCF为0.555,95%置信区间均为0.50。这些发现提出了探索性的人口水平数字运动信号;然而,较小的效应量和接近机会的单变量AUC值表明预测性能有限,不支持将其作为单个IUI结果的独立预测因子。
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.