Predictors of Response to Fractional CO₂ Laser Therapy in Hypertrophic Burn Scars: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Timothy Worley, Alexandra McDowell, Aaron De Souza, Alan Pang
{"title":"Predictors of Response to Fractional CO₂ Laser Therapy in Hypertrophic Burn Scars: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Timothy Worley, Alexandra McDowell, Aaron De Souza, Alan Pang","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irag123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertrophic burn scars are associated with significant functional impairment and psychosocial morbidity. While fractional CO₂ laser therapy has demonstrated efficacy in improving scar quality and symptoms, limited data exist on how baseline scar characteristics and patient factors influence treatment response. This study evaluated whether baseline scar severity, total body surface area (TBSA), and duration of initial hospital stay predict responsiveness to fractional CO₂ laser therapy, and whether laser treatment is associated with a reduced need for scar contracture release procedures. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including burn patients who underwent fractional CO₂ laser therapy. Scar severity was assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) before and after treatment. Additional variables included TBSA, length of initial hospitalization, and incidence of subsequent scar contracture release procedures. A control cohort of burn patients who did not receive laser therapy was included for comparison. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors of scar improvement and associations with procedural outcomes. Baseline VSS score was the strongest predictor of treatment response, with higher initial severity associated with greater improvement following laser therapy. TBSA and hospital length of stay were not significantly associated with treatment response. Laser therapy was associated with fewer scar contracture release procedures; however, this did not reach statistical significance, likely due to limited sample size. These findings suggest initial scar severity is a key determinant of laser responsiveness and support further study in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertrophic burn scars are associated with significant functional impairment and psychosocial morbidity. While fractional CO₂ laser therapy has demonstrated efficacy in improving scar quality and symptoms, limited data exist on how baseline scar characteristics and patient factors influence treatment response. This study evaluated whether baseline scar severity, total body surface area (TBSA), and duration of initial hospital stay predict responsiveness to fractional CO₂ laser therapy, and whether laser treatment is associated with a reduced need for scar contracture release procedures. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including burn patients who underwent fractional CO₂ laser therapy. Scar severity was assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) before and after treatment. Additional variables included TBSA, length of initial hospitalization, and incidence of subsequent scar contracture release procedures. A control cohort of burn patients who did not receive laser therapy was included for comparison. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors of scar improvement and associations with procedural outcomes. Baseline VSS score was the strongest predictor of treatment response, with higher initial severity associated with greater improvement following laser therapy. TBSA and hospital length of stay were not significantly associated with treatment response. Laser therapy was associated with fewer scar contracture release procedures; however, this did not reach statistical significance, likely due to limited sample size. These findings suggest initial scar severity is a key determinant of laser responsiveness and support further study in larger cohorts.

增生性烧伤疤痕部分co2激光治疗反应的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
增生性烧伤疤痕与显著的功能损害和社会心理疾病有关。虽然分数co2激光治疗已证明在改善疤痕质量和症状方面有效,但关于基线疤痕特征和患者因素如何影响治疗反应的数据有限。本研究评估了基线疤痕严重程度、总体表面积(TBSA)和初次住院时间是否能预测对分数co2激光治疗的反应性,以及激光治疗是否与减少疤痕挛缩释放手术的需求相关。一项回顾性队列研究进行了烧伤患者接受部分一氧化碳激光治疗。治疗前后采用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评估疤痕严重程度。其他变量包括TBSA、初次住院时间和随后瘢痕挛缩松解手术的发生率。一组未接受激光治疗的烧伤患者被纳入对照队列进行比较。进行统计分析以确定疤痕改善的预测因素及其与手术结果的关联。基线VSS评分是治疗反应的最强预测指标,激光治疗后,初始严重程度越高,改善越大。TBSA和住院时间与治疗反应无显著相关。激光治疗与较少的瘢痕挛缩释放手术相关;然而,这可能是由于样本量有限,没有达到统计学意义。这些发现表明初始疤痕严重程度是激光反应性的关键决定因素,并支持在更大的队列中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书