Individualizing post-ICU nutrition: from guideline intent to bedside practice.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-22 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001412
Oona Leemans, Zenzi Rosseel, Claude Pichard, Dan Waitzberg, Lee-Anne S Chapple, Krista Haines, Lu Ke, Paul Wischmeyer, Arthur R H van Zanten, Elisabeth De Waele
{"title":"Individualizing post-ICU nutrition: from guideline intent to bedside practice.","authors":"Oona Leemans, Zenzi Rosseel, Claude Pichard, Dan Waitzberg, Lee-Anne S Chapple, Krista Haines, Lu Ke, Paul Wischmeyer, Arthur R H van Zanten, Elisabeth De Waele","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Survivorship of critical illness has increased, shifting attention toward recovery and long-term outcomes. Post-ICU nutrition is emerging as a clinically relevant, yet underperforming contributor to functional recovery and quality of life. Persistent nutritional inadequacy reflects insufficiently defined physiological requirements and limited implementable evidence-based guidance during ICU recovery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Energy and protein delivery sharply decline after ICU discharge, despite persistent metabolic demands. Underfeeding can result from the absence of recovery-specific targets, patient-level barriers (e.g. appetite loss, dysphagia, fatigue), and fragmented care transitions, including premature feeding-tube removal and suboptimal monitoring of oral intake. Structured patient and family engagement can help operationalize individualized nutritional strategies and improve feasibility without substantial resource burden, acting as continuity agents.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Post-ICU nutritional failure reflects combined physiological and implementation challenges. Clinicians should recognize the post-ICU hospitalization period as a potential 'metabolic danger zone', requiring a shift from acute-phase restrictive feeding toward strategies prioritizing functional recovery and lean mass preservation. Improving outcomes requires standardized, yet adaptable, care pathways that bridge ICU-to-ward transitions, operationalize individualization, and integrate patient and family input as clinical instruments. Future research should prioritize multicenter implementation studies centered on 'disability-free survival' to inform adaptive, evidence-based nutritional protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"528-535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Survivorship of critical illness has increased, shifting attention toward recovery and long-term outcomes. Post-ICU nutrition is emerging as a clinically relevant, yet underperforming contributor to functional recovery and quality of life. Persistent nutritional inadequacy reflects insufficiently defined physiological requirements and limited implementable evidence-based guidance during ICU recovery.

Recent findings: Energy and protein delivery sharply decline after ICU discharge, despite persistent metabolic demands. Underfeeding can result from the absence of recovery-specific targets, patient-level barriers (e.g. appetite loss, dysphagia, fatigue), and fragmented care transitions, including premature feeding-tube removal and suboptimal monitoring of oral intake. Structured patient and family engagement can help operationalize individualized nutritional strategies and improve feasibility without substantial resource burden, acting as continuity agents.

Summary: Post-ICU nutritional failure reflects combined physiological and implementation challenges. Clinicians should recognize the post-ICU hospitalization period as a potential 'metabolic danger zone', requiring a shift from acute-phase restrictive feeding toward strategies prioritizing functional recovery and lean mass preservation. Improving outcomes requires standardized, yet adaptable, care pathways that bridge ICU-to-ward transitions, operationalize individualization, and integrate patient and family input as clinical instruments. Future research should prioritize multicenter implementation studies centered on 'disability-free survival' to inform adaptive, evidence-based nutritional protocols.

个性化icu后营养:从指南意图到床边实践。
综述目的:危重疾病的生存率增加,将注意力转向康复和长期预后。icu后营养正在成为临床相关的,但在功能恢复和生活质量方面表现不佳的贡献者。在ICU康复期间,持续的营养不足反映了生理需求的不明确和有限的可实施的循证指导。最近的研究发现:尽管有持续的代谢需求,但在ICU出院后,能量和蛋白质的输送急剧下降。进食不足可能是由于缺乏特定的恢复目标、患者层面的障碍(如食欲减退、吞咽困难、疲劳)和不连贯的护理过渡(包括过早拔掉喂食管和对口服摄入监测不理想)造成的。结构化的患者和家庭参与可以帮助实施个性化营养策略,并在没有大量资源负担的情况下提高可行性,作为连续性代理人。总结:icu后营养衰竭反映了生理和执行的双重挑战。临床医生应该认识到icu后住院期是一个潜在的“代谢危险区”,需要从急性期限制性喂养转向优先考虑功能恢复和瘦肉块保存的策略。改善结果需要标准化但适应性强的护理途径,这些途径可以将重症监护室到病房的过渡连接起来,实现个性化操作,并将患者和家庭的投入作为临床工具整合起来。未来的研究应优先考虑以“无残疾生存”为中心的多中心实施研究,为适应性、循证营养方案提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书