{"title":"Interpreting troponin elevation after surgery: diagnostic challenges and a pragmatic approach.","authors":"M Dave, K Mokrzycki, C Bailey","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2026.0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiac troponin is a highly sensitive marker of myocardial injury, although its interpretation after non-cardiac surgery remains challenging. Postoperative troponin elevation is common, frequently asymptomatic and associated with a markedly increased risk of short-term mortality, yet it is often misinterpreted or overlooked in surgical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a narrative review of contemporary evidence and international guidelines addressing perioperative troponin measurement, myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS), and perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), with a focus on their relevance to surgical teams. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for adult English-language studies, prioritising the past 10-15 years and key consensus statements. Studies relevant to postoperative outcomes, risk stratification and management were synthesised into a pragmatic stepwise approach for surgical teams.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Studies including VISION and POISE demonstrate that even modest postoperative troponin rises are independently associated with substantially increased 30-day mortality, most often in the absence of ischaemic symptoms. Differentiating type 1 MI, type 2 MI and non-ischaemic myocardial injury is difficult in the perioperative setting because clinical features, electrocardiography and baseline troponin values are frequently non-specific. Contemporary European and North American guidelines now support targeted perioperative troponin surveillance in high-risk patients to allow early detection and risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative troponin elevation represents a powerful prognostic marker rather than a single disease entity. A structured, stepwise approach incorporating preoperative risk assessment, serial troponin measurement, clinical correlation and selective imaging can help surgical teams distinguish clinically significant myocardial injury from chronic or non-ischaemic elevation, enabling timely multidisciplinary management and potentially improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2026.0070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac troponin is a highly sensitive marker of myocardial injury, although its interpretation after non-cardiac surgery remains challenging. Postoperative troponin elevation is common, frequently asymptomatic and associated with a markedly increased risk of short-term mortality, yet it is often misinterpreted or overlooked in surgical practice.
Methods: We performed a narrative review of contemporary evidence and international guidelines addressing perioperative troponin measurement, myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS), and perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), with a focus on their relevance to surgical teams. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for adult English-language studies, prioritising the past 10-15 years and key consensus statements. Studies relevant to postoperative outcomes, risk stratification and management were synthesised into a pragmatic stepwise approach for surgical teams.
Findings: Studies including VISION and POISE demonstrate that even modest postoperative troponin rises are independently associated with substantially increased 30-day mortality, most often in the absence of ischaemic symptoms. Differentiating type 1 MI, type 2 MI and non-ischaemic myocardial injury is difficult in the perioperative setting because clinical features, electrocardiography and baseline troponin values are frequently non-specific. Contemporary European and North American guidelines now support targeted perioperative troponin surveillance in high-risk patients to allow early detection and risk stratification.
Conclusions: Postoperative troponin elevation represents a powerful prognostic marker rather than a single disease entity. A structured, stepwise approach incorporating preoperative risk assessment, serial troponin measurement, clinical correlation and selective imaging can help surgical teams distinguish clinically significant myocardial injury from chronic or non-ischaemic elevation, enabling timely multidisciplinary management and potentially improving outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November.
The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.