Quantifying the current impact of listing ACL reconstructions as low priority on subsequent meniscal pathology.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
M Bellamy, S Allan, L Pearce, T Stedman, A Legg, A Anderson
{"title":"Quantifying the current impact of listing ACL reconstructions as low priority on subsequent meniscal pathology.","authors":"M Bellamy, S Allan, L Pearce, T Stedman, A Legg, A Anderson","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2026.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures can cause knee instability, potentially leading to meniscal and chondral injury if left untreated. Recent guidance suggests listing ACL reconstruction as lower priority without meniscal pathology. This study examines the risk of subsequent meniscal tears with delayed surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study (January 2018-March 2024) of consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Patients were categorised by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of meniscal tears, and time from listing to surgery. Intraoperative findings of meniscal tears were recorded. Nonparametric testing and binary logistic regression determined risk factors for meniscal pathology with delayed surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 272 patients, 15.1% had new meniscal tears identified intraoperatively that were absent on initial MRI scan, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. Additionally, 5% had MRI-detected pathology not confirmed surgically. Median time to diagnosis was 21 days, and median time to surgery was 140 days. Age and time to diagnosis did not affect outcomes (<i>p</i>>0.05). Body mass index (BMI) differences were not significant overall but became significant when outliers (BMI>43) were excluded (<i>p</i>=0.038). Logistic regression, adjusting for sex and BMI, showed a 0.3% increase in meniscal tear risk per waiting day (<i>p</i>=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the risk factors and progression of meniscal tears following delayed ACL reconstruction. Patient BMI and waiting list duration are important factors for risk reduction. With a delay of a month to surgery, the likelihood of developing a meniscal tear increases by nearly 10%. These findings emphasise the importance of early intervention, and potential re-evaluation of the current guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2026.0054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures can cause knee instability, potentially leading to meniscal and chondral injury if left untreated. Recent guidance suggests listing ACL reconstruction as lower priority without meniscal pathology. This study examines the risk of subsequent meniscal tears with delayed surgery.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (January 2018-March 2024) of consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Patients were categorised by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of meniscal tears, and time from listing to surgery. Intraoperative findings of meniscal tears were recorded. Nonparametric testing and binary logistic regression determined risk factors for meniscal pathology with delayed surgery.

Results: Among 272 patients, 15.1% had new meniscal tears identified intraoperatively that were absent on initial MRI scan, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. Additionally, 5% had MRI-detected pathology not confirmed surgically. Median time to diagnosis was 21 days, and median time to surgery was 140 days. Age and time to diagnosis did not affect outcomes (p>0.05). Body mass index (BMI) differences were not significant overall but became significant when outliers (BMI>43) were excluded (p=0.038). Logistic regression, adjusting for sex and BMI, showed a 0.3% increase in meniscal tear risk per waiting day (p=0.013).

Conclusions: This study highlights the risk factors and progression of meniscal tears following delayed ACL reconstruction. Patient BMI and waiting list duration are important factors for risk reduction. With a delay of a month to surgery, the likelihood of developing a meniscal tear increases by nearly 10%. These findings emphasise the importance of early intervention, and potential re-evaluation of the current guidance.

量化列出ACL重建对随后半月板病理的低优先级的当前影响。
前交叉韧带(ACL)破裂可导致膝关节不稳定,如果不及时治疗,可能导致半月板和软骨损伤。最近的指导建议将ACL重建列为较低优先级,没有半月板病理。本研究探讨延迟手术后半月板撕裂的风险。方法:我们对连续接受ACL重建的患者进行了回顾性队列研究(2018年1月至2024年3月)。患者根据术前半月板撕裂的磁共振成像(MRI)结果和从挂牌到手术的时间进行分类。记录半月板撕裂的术中表现。非参数检验和二元逻辑回归确定半月板病理延迟手术的危险因素。结果:272例患者中,15.1%的患者术中发现新的半月板撕裂,而在最初的MRI扫描中没有发现,男女比例为3:1。此外,5%的患者有mri检测到的病理未经手术证实。中位诊断时间为21天,中位手术时间为140天。年龄和诊断时间对预后无影响(p < 0.05)。总体而言,体重指数(BMI)差异不显著,但当排除异常值(BMI bbbb43)时,差异变得显著(p=0.038)。经性别和BMI调整后的Logistic回归显示,每等待一天,半月板撕裂风险增加0.3% (p=0.013)。结论:本研究强调了延迟前交叉韧带重建后半月板撕裂的危险因素和进展。患者BMI和等候名单时间是降低风险的重要因素。如果手术延迟一个月,发生半月板撕裂的可能性会增加近10%。这些发现强调了早期干预的重要性,以及对当前指南进行重新评估的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书