Pathway to zero-carbon emission of energy recovery processes from heavy oil reservoirs

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102288
Zeyu Lin, Xinqian Lu, Weifeng Lv, Heyu Liu, Bin Ding, Fanhua Zeng
{"title":"Pathway to zero-carbon emission of energy recovery processes from heavy oil reservoirs","authors":"Zeyu Lin,&nbsp;Xinqian Lu,&nbsp;Weifeng Lv,&nbsp;Heyu Liu,&nbsp;Bin Ding,&nbsp;Fanhua Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2026.102288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, declining production of conventional light oil, together with steadily increasing global energy demand, has elevated the strategic importance of heavy oil resources. However, the intrinsically high viscosity of heavy oil severely limits the effectiveness of conventional recovery methods, with typical recovery factors generally below 15%. Thermal recovery technologies enhance oil mobility by injecting heat carriers into the reservoir, thereby substantially improving recovery efficiency. Nevertheless, the generation of thermal agents relies on large-scale fuel combustion and is associated with considerable CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, rendering traditional thermal processes increasingly incompatible with current goals of green and low-carbon oilfield development. Against this background, low-carbon development technologies for heavy oil reservoirs have emerged as major research and application frontiers. Representative approaches include expanding-solvent SAGD (ES-SAGD), non-condensable gas-assisted SAGD (NCG-SAGD), in-situ reflux (ISR), vapor extraction (VAPEX), cyclic solvent injection (CSI) and in-situ hydrogen generation (ISHG). Despite growing research efforts, a comprehensive understanding of their underlying mechanisms, field performance, and carbon emission reduction potential in enhancing oil recovery (EOR) remains limited, which constrains objective assessments of engineering applicability and rational technology selection. To address this gap, this study provides an integrated review of representative mentioned six low-to zero-carbon emission heavy oil EOR technologies, focusing on their fundamental mechanisms, carbon emission reduction potential, technical advantages and limitations, and future development trends. These findings provide scientifically grounded screening criteria and practical references for the low-to zero-carbon development of heavy oil reservoirs, thereby supporting the green and sustainable development of heavy oil reservoirs worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102288"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X26002555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, declining production of conventional light oil, together with steadily increasing global energy demand, has elevated the strategic importance of heavy oil resources. However, the intrinsically high viscosity of heavy oil severely limits the effectiveness of conventional recovery methods, with typical recovery factors generally below 15%. Thermal recovery technologies enhance oil mobility by injecting heat carriers into the reservoir, thereby substantially improving recovery efficiency. Nevertheless, the generation of thermal agents relies on large-scale fuel combustion and is associated with considerable CO2 emissions, rendering traditional thermal processes increasingly incompatible with current goals of green and low-carbon oilfield development. Against this background, low-carbon development technologies for heavy oil reservoirs have emerged as major research and application frontiers. Representative approaches include expanding-solvent SAGD (ES-SAGD), non-condensable gas-assisted SAGD (NCG-SAGD), in-situ reflux (ISR), vapor extraction (VAPEX), cyclic solvent injection (CSI) and in-situ hydrogen generation (ISHG). Despite growing research efforts, a comprehensive understanding of their underlying mechanisms, field performance, and carbon emission reduction potential in enhancing oil recovery (EOR) remains limited, which constrains objective assessments of engineering applicability and rational technology selection. To address this gap, this study provides an integrated review of representative mentioned six low-to zero-carbon emission heavy oil EOR technologies, focusing on their fundamental mechanisms, carbon emission reduction potential, technical advantages and limitations, and future development trends. These findings provide scientifically grounded screening criteria and practical references for the low-to zero-carbon development of heavy oil reservoirs, thereby supporting the green and sustainable development of heavy oil reservoirs worldwide.
稠油储层能源回收过程的零碳排放途径
近年来,常规轻油产量的下降,加上全球能源需求的稳步增长,使得重油资源的战略重要性得到提升。然而,稠油固有的高粘度严重限制了常规采收率方法的有效性,典型的采收率通常低于15%。热采技术通过向储层注入热载体来提高油的流动性,从而大大提高采收率。然而,热剂的产生依赖于大规模的燃料燃烧,并且伴随着大量的二氧化碳排放,这使得传统的热工艺越来越不符合当前绿色低碳油田开发的目标。在此背景下,稠油油藏低碳开发技术已成为重要的研究和应用前沿。代表性的方法包括膨胀溶剂SAGD (ES-SAGD)、不可冷凝气体辅助SAGD (NCG-SAGD)、原位回流(ISR)、蒸汽萃取(VAPEX)、循环溶剂注入(CSI)和原位制氢(ISHG)。尽管研究力度越来越大,但对其潜在机制、现场性能和提高采收率(EOR)的碳减排潜力的全面了解仍然有限,这限制了对工程适用性的客观评估和合理的技术选择。为了弥补这一差距,本研究对上述6种具有代表性的低碳至零碳重油提高采收率技术进行了综合评述,重点分析了其基本机制、碳减排潜力、技术优势与局限性以及未来发展趋势。研究结果为稠油油藏低碳、零碳开发提供了科学依据的筛选标准和实践参考,从而支持全球稠油油藏绿色可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书