Market shaping visioning and competing frames: Influencing the future of clean hydrogen

IF 7.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.06.014
Daniel Schepis, Stephan Dua Modest, Sharon Purchase, Sudha Mani
{"title":"Market shaping visioning and competing frames: Influencing the future of clean hydrogen","authors":"Daniel Schepis,&nbsp;Stephan Dua Modest,&nbsp;Sharon Purchase,&nbsp;Sudha Mani","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In capital-intensive and uncertain sectors like clean energy, governments are often viewed as initial market drivers, providing the necessary support for new technologies and infrastructure to stimulate change. Little is known about how firms and other stakeholders influence the market driver's role and activities in early-market formation. Drawing on a market shaping perspective, this study explores how actor visioning draws on competing frames to influence market shaping at the ‘fuzzy front-end’. We present a case study of the Australian clean hydrogen context, based on interviews with thirty-eight stakeholders and eighty-three policy and industry documents. We identify four key visioning contest areas which influence market shaping: developmental pace, resource allocation, market scope and governing purpose, each aligned with different sets of competing frames drawn upon by participants. Our findings make three contributions by conceptualising visioning as a distributed multi-actor process in market shaping; identifying how visioning leverages distinct, yet overlapping competing frames; and uncovering the discursive micro-foundations of market shaping to legitimise and promote preferred market configurations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"136 ","pages":"Pages 240-251"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850126001069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In capital-intensive and uncertain sectors like clean energy, governments are often viewed as initial market drivers, providing the necessary support for new technologies and infrastructure to stimulate change. Little is known about how firms and other stakeholders influence the market driver's role and activities in early-market formation. Drawing on a market shaping perspective, this study explores how actor visioning draws on competing frames to influence market shaping at the ‘fuzzy front-end’. We present a case study of the Australian clean hydrogen context, based on interviews with thirty-eight stakeholders and eighty-three policy and industry documents. We identify four key visioning contest areas which influence market shaping: developmental pace, resource allocation, market scope and governing purpose, each aligned with different sets of competing frames drawn upon by participants. Our findings make three contributions by conceptualising visioning as a distributed multi-actor process in market shaping; identifying how visioning leverages distinct, yet overlapping competing frames; and uncovering the discursive micro-foundations of market shaping to legitimise and promote preferred market configurations.
市场塑造愿景和竞争框架:影响清洁氢的未来
在清洁能源等资本密集型和不确定的行业,政府往往被视为最初的市场驱动者,为新技术和基础设施提供必要的支持,以刺激变革。对于企业和其他利益相关者如何影响市场驱动者在早期市场形成中的角色和活动,我们知之甚少。从市场形成的角度出发,本研究探讨了行动者愿景如何在“模糊前端”利用竞争框架来影响市场形成。我们基于对38位利益相关者和83份政策和行业文件的采访,提出了澳大利亚清洁氢环境的案例研究。我们确定了影响市场形成的四个关键愿景竞赛领域:发展速度、资源分配、市场范围和治理目的,每个领域都与参与者所采用的不同竞争框架相一致。我们的发现有三个贡献:将愿景概念化为市场塑造中的分布式多参与者过程;识别视觉如何利用不同的,但重叠的竞争框架;并揭示市场塑造的话语微观基础,以使优选的市场配置合法化和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书