Multi-ancestry colocalization approaches.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
PLoS Genetics Pub Date : 2026-07-21 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1012221
Cathy Shen, Josée Dupuis, Qihuang Zhang
{"title":"Multi-ancestry colocalization approaches.","authors":"Cathy Shen, Josée Dupuis, Qihuang Zhang","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1012221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of variants associated with complex traits, but many are non-causal. Statistical fine-mapping methods aim to pinpoint the most likely causal variants among the many associated ones. While most fine-mapping methods were originally limited to single ancestry analysis, multi-ancestry fine-mapping methods are now available, leveraging differences in linkage disequilibrium (LD) and minor allele frequencies (MAFs) across ancestries to improve fine-mapping resolution. However, the biological relevance of the putative causal variants identified through fine-mapping often remains unclear. Colocalization methods improve interpretability by integrating GWAS data with other functional genomics datasets to assess whether two traits share the same causal variants. Despite the growing availability of multi-ancestry data, there are currently no established methods for multi-ancestry colocalization. In this study, we propose multi-ancestry colocalization approaches through the integration of multi-ancestry fine-mapping methods, SuSiEx and MsCAVIAR, with single ancestry colocalization methods, coloc and eCAVIAR. We introduce coloc_SuSiEx, eCAVIAR_SuSiEx, eMsCAVIAR and coloc_MsCAVIAR. The performance of the proposed approaches is evaluated and compared through simulation studies. In loci with a single causal variant, credible set sizes across the four approaches were comparable, as was the prioritization of the true causal variant. MsCAVIAR-based approaches were more computationally expensive compared to SuSiEx-based approaches, which is an important consideration for the analysis of regions with multiple causal variants. Compared to the coloc-based approaches, the eCAVIAR-based approaches tended to report lower loci level colocalization posterior probabilities. For the analysis of loci with multiple causal variants, coloc_SuSiEx is the preferred approach. We apply the proposed approaches to perform a colocalization analysis of multi-ancestry T2D GWAS data from the DIAMANTE Consortium and European pQTL data from the INTERVAL study. This work addresses the increasing need for multi-ancestry approaches to colocalization analysis as more multi-ancestry data become available.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"22 7","pages":"e1012221"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13387578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of variants associated with complex traits, but many are non-causal. Statistical fine-mapping methods aim to pinpoint the most likely causal variants among the many associated ones. While most fine-mapping methods were originally limited to single ancestry analysis, multi-ancestry fine-mapping methods are now available, leveraging differences in linkage disequilibrium (LD) and minor allele frequencies (MAFs) across ancestries to improve fine-mapping resolution. However, the biological relevance of the putative causal variants identified through fine-mapping often remains unclear. Colocalization methods improve interpretability by integrating GWAS data with other functional genomics datasets to assess whether two traits share the same causal variants. Despite the growing availability of multi-ancestry data, there are currently no established methods for multi-ancestry colocalization. In this study, we propose multi-ancestry colocalization approaches through the integration of multi-ancestry fine-mapping methods, SuSiEx and MsCAVIAR, with single ancestry colocalization methods, coloc and eCAVIAR. We introduce coloc_SuSiEx, eCAVIAR_SuSiEx, eMsCAVIAR and coloc_MsCAVIAR. The performance of the proposed approaches is evaluated and compared through simulation studies. In loci with a single causal variant, credible set sizes across the four approaches were comparable, as was the prioritization of the true causal variant. MsCAVIAR-based approaches were more computationally expensive compared to SuSiEx-based approaches, which is an important consideration for the analysis of regions with multiple causal variants. Compared to the coloc-based approaches, the eCAVIAR-based approaches tended to report lower loci level colocalization posterior probabilities. For the analysis of loci with multiple causal variants, coloc_SuSiEx is the preferred approach. We apply the proposed approaches to perform a colocalization analysis of multi-ancestry T2D GWAS data from the DIAMANTE Consortium and European pQTL data from the INTERVAL study. This work addresses the increasing need for multi-ancestry approaches to colocalization analysis as more multi-ancestry data become available.

多祖先共定位方法。
全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经确定了数千种与复杂性状相关的变异,但其中许多是无因果关系的。统计精细映射方法的目的是在许多相关变量中找出最可能的因果变量。虽然大多数精细作图方法最初仅限于单祖先分析,但现在可以使用多祖先精细作图方法,利用祖先间连锁不平衡(LD)和次要等位基因频率(MAFs)的差异来提高精细作图分辨率。然而,通过精细绘图确定的假定因果变异的生物学相关性通常仍然不清楚。共定位方法通过整合GWAS数据与其他功能基因组学数据集来评估两个性状是否具有相同的因果变异,从而提高了可解释性。尽管多祖先数据的可用性越来越高,但目前还没有确定的多祖先共定位方法。在本研究中,我们通过整合多祖先精细定位方法SuSiEx和MsCAVIAR,以及单祖先共定位方法coloc和eCAVIAR,提出了多祖先共定位方法。我们介绍了coloc_SuSiEx、eCAVIAR_SuSiEx、eMsCAVIAR和coloc_MsCAVIAR。通过仿真研究对所提方法的性能进行了评价和比较。在具有单一因果变异的基因座中,四种方法的可信集大小具有可比性,真正因果变异的优先级也是如此。与基于susiex的方法相比,基于mscaviar的方法计算成本更高,这是分析具有多个因果变量的区域的重要考虑因素。与基于colc的方法相比,基于ecaviar的方法倾向于报告较低的位点水平共定位后验概率。对于具有多个因果变异的基因座的分析,coloc_SuSiEx是首选的方法。我们应用提出的方法对来自DIAMANTE联盟的多祖先T2D GWAS数据和来自INTERVAL研究的欧洲pQTL数据进行共定位分析。随着越来越多的多祖先数据可用,这项工作解决了对多祖先共定位分析方法的日益增长的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书