When Provider Contact Does Not Become PrEP Care.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jeong Kyu Lee, Hyemin Lee
{"title":"When Provider Contact Does Not Become PrEP Care.","authors":"Jeong Kyu Lee, Hyemin Lee","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2026.2707325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations remains unequal across intersecting lines of race, gender identity, and socioeconomic position, even when awareness and prior provider discussion are present. This conceptual article treats these disparities as communication inequality visible at the clinical encounter, where provider contact can occur without converting into actionable care. Drawing on Lin's network theory of social capital, it recasts provider contact as a mobilization event whose value depends on its return, and locates the disparity in a return deficit, in which formally similar resources yield unequal outcomes across groups. Intersectional discrimination shapes this conversion through patient-side disclosure costs and provider-side recognition failures, in which PrEP candidacy is not registered despite contact. The framework shifts the central question from whether provider discussion occurs to what the encounter produces, redirecting analysis and intervention toward these conversion endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2026.2707325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations remains unequal across intersecting lines of race, gender identity, and socioeconomic position, even when awareness and prior provider discussion are present. This conceptual article treats these disparities as communication inequality visible at the clinical encounter, where provider contact can occur without converting into actionable care. Drawing on Lin's network theory of social capital, it recasts provider contact as a mobilization event whose value depends on its return, and locates the disparity in a return deficit, in which formally similar resources yield unequal outcomes across groups. Intersectional discrimination shapes this conversion through patient-side disclosure costs and provider-side recognition failures, in which PrEP candidacy is not registered despite contact. The framework shifts the central question from whether provider discussion occurs to what the encounter produces, redirecting analysis and intervention toward these conversion endpoints.

当与医生接触不成为PrEP护理时。
性少数和性别少数(SGM)人群暴露前预防(PrEP)的吸收在种族、性别认同和社会经济地位的交叉线上仍然不平等,即使在意识和先前的提供者讨论存在的情况下。这篇概念性文章将这些差异视为临床接触中可见的沟通不平等,其中提供者接触可能发生而不转化为可操作的护理。借鉴林的社会资本网络理论,它将提供者接触重新定义为一种价值取决于其回报的动员事件,并将差异定位于回报赤字,即形式上相似的资源在群体之间产生不平等的结果。交叉歧视通过患者方面的披露成本和提供者方面的识别失败塑造了这种转换,在这种情况下,尽管接触了PrEP候选资格,但仍未注册。该框架将中心问题从提供者讨论是否发生转移到相遇产生了什么,将分析和干预重新定向到这些转换端点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书