{"title":"Cannabis-Based Medicines for Nociplastic Pain: A Scoping Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Outcomes.","authors":"Hugo Miguel-Seno, Paulo Reis-Pina","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2026.2704788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis-based medicines (CBM) are increasingly considered for nociplastic pain (NOCP) despite limited evidence. This scoping review mapped evidence on efficacy, safety, patient-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations for CBM in NOCP. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through 2024. Eligibility included patients with NOCP or a nociplastic phenotype, any setting, any study design, and English language. Data were charted inductively, synthesized narratively, and risk of bias was assessed. Ten studies were included, predominantly secondary (reviews/opinions, consensus), with very limited primary data linking CBM to nociplastic mechanisms. Signals suggest modest benefits in fibromyalgia and chronic musculoskeletal pain, with improvements more evident for sleep, affective domains, and quality-of-life than for direct analgesia. Adverse effects were common (e.g., sedation, dizziness, psychiatric symptoms), particularly with tetrahydrocannabinol-dominant products. PK findings included low/variable oral bioavailability (∼6%), food and hepatic effects (notably for cannabidiol), and prolonged terminal half-life; PD effects included psychomotor and cognitive impairment. No study applied standardized nociplastic instruments. Co-administration cautions with opioids were noted, but no phenotype-specific opioid-sparing evidence was identified. Overall, evidence remains low-certainty and indirect, supporting adequately powered, longer-term trials with explicit NOCP phenotyping and standardized formulations. CBM show outcome-specific benefits balanced against dose- and formulation-dependent harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2026.2704788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cannabis-based medicines (CBM) are increasingly considered for nociplastic pain (NOCP) despite limited evidence. This scoping review mapped evidence on efficacy, safety, patient-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations for CBM in NOCP. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through 2024. Eligibility included patients with NOCP or a nociplastic phenotype, any setting, any study design, and English language. Data were charted inductively, synthesized narratively, and risk of bias was assessed. Ten studies were included, predominantly secondary (reviews/opinions, consensus), with very limited primary data linking CBM to nociplastic mechanisms. Signals suggest modest benefits in fibromyalgia and chronic musculoskeletal pain, with improvements more evident for sleep, affective domains, and quality-of-life than for direct analgesia. Adverse effects were common (e.g., sedation, dizziness, psychiatric symptoms), particularly with tetrahydrocannabinol-dominant products. PK findings included low/variable oral bioavailability (∼6%), food and hepatic effects (notably for cannabidiol), and prolonged terminal half-life; PD effects included psychomotor and cognitive impairment. No study applied standardized nociplastic instruments. Co-administration cautions with opioids were noted, but no phenotype-specific opioid-sparing evidence was identified. Overall, evidence remains low-certainty and indirect, supporting adequately powered, longer-term trials with explicit NOCP phenotyping and standardized formulations. CBM show outcome-specific benefits balanced against dose- and formulation-dependent harms.
尽管证据有限,但基于大麻的药物(CBM)越来越多地被考虑用于伤害性疼痛(NOCP)。该范围综述绘制了NOCP中CBM的有效性、安全性、患者报告的结果和药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)考虑因素的证据。MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Scopus检索到2024年。入选条件包括NOCP或致病性表型患者、任何环境、任何研究设计和英语语言。数据归纳绘制图表,综合叙述,并评估偏倚风险。纳入了10项研究,主要是次要的(综述/意见,共识),将CBM与危害机制联系起来的主要数据非常有限。信号显示对纤维肌痛和慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛有一定的益处,与直接镇痛相比,对睡眠、情感领域和生活质量的改善更为明显。不良反应很常见(例如镇静、头晕、精神症状),特别是四氢大麻酚为主的产品。PK结果包括低/可变的口服生物利用度(约6%),食物和肝脏效应(特别是大麻二酚)和延长的终末半衰期;PD的影响包括精神运动和认知障碍。没有研究使用标准化的致伤仪器。注意到与阿片类药物共同给药的警告,但没有发现特异性阿片类药物保护的证据。总的来说,证据仍然是低确定性和间接的,支持充分有力的长期试验,明确NOCP表型和标准化配方。CBM显示出与剂量和配方依赖的危害相平衡的结果特异性益处。