Post-Cementation Sensitivity of Zirconia Crowns: A Comparative Clinical Study of Glass Ionomer and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.4317/jced.64124
Rajmonda Halili, Sebahate Hamiti Alidema
{"title":"Post-Cementation Sensitivity of Zirconia Crowns: A Comparative Clinical Study of Glass Ionomer and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.","authors":"Rajmonda Halili, Sebahate Hamiti Alidema","doi":"10.4317/jced.64124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This clinical study evaluated post-cementation sensitivity after zirconia crown cementation using two luting agents: a conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji I) and a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Calibra Ceram).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 40 patients requiring zirconia crown restorations were included in the study and randomly allocated to one of two groups according to the luting cement used. In Group I, zirconia crowns were cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji I), whereas in Group II they were cemented with self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Calibra Ceram). Post-cementation sensitivity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 2 hours after cementation and after 14 days. Sensitivity was evaluated in response to cold, heat, and biting stimuli. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. As the data were not normally distributed, intragroup comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and intergroup comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At both evaluation times, the Fuji I group showed higher sensitivity scores than the Calibra Ceram group for cold, heat, and biting stimuli. Cold and heat sensitivity decreased significantly from baseline to day 14 in both groups. For biting sensitivity, a significant reduction was observed in the Fuji I group, whereas the reduction in the Calibra Ceram group was not statistically significant. Between-group comparisons showed significantly lower sensitivity scores in the Calibra Ceram group for all tested stimuli at both time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this clinical study, zirconia crowns cemented with self-adhesive resin cement showed lower post-cementation sensitivity than those cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement. The type of luting cement may therefore influence early postoperative sensitivity and patient comfort following zirconia crown cementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"18 7","pages":"e848-e853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13386449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.64124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This clinical study evaluated post-cementation sensitivity after zirconia crown cementation using two luting agents: a conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji I) and a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Calibra Ceram).

Materials and methods: A total of 40 patients requiring zirconia crown restorations were included in the study and randomly allocated to one of two groups according to the luting cement used. In Group I, zirconia crowns were cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji I), whereas in Group II they were cemented with self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Calibra Ceram). Post-cementation sensitivity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 2 hours after cementation and after 14 days. Sensitivity was evaluated in response to cold, heat, and biting stimuli. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. As the data were not normally distributed, intragroup comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and intergroup comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).

Results: At both evaluation times, the Fuji I group showed higher sensitivity scores than the Calibra Ceram group for cold, heat, and biting stimuli. Cold and heat sensitivity decreased significantly from baseline to day 14 in both groups. For biting sensitivity, a significant reduction was observed in the Fuji I group, whereas the reduction in the Calibra Ceram group was not statistically significant. Between-group comparisons showed significantly lower sensitivity scores in the Calibra Ceram group for all tested stimuli at both time points.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this clinical study, zirconia crowns cemented with self-adhesive resin cement showed lower post-cementation sensitivity than those cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement. The type of luting cement may therefore influence early postoperative sensitivity and patient comfort following zirconia crown cementation.

氧化锆冠胶结后的敏感性:玻璃离子与自粘树脂胶结的临床比较研究。
背景:本临床研究评估了使用两种固定剂:传统的玻璃离子水门栓(Fuji I)和自粘双固化树脂水门栓(Calibra Ceram)进行氧化锆冠胶结后的敏感性。材料与方法:本研究共纳入40例需要氧化锆冠修复的患者,根据所使用的骨水泥随机分为两组。第一组采用传统玻璃离子水门合剂(Fuji I)对氧化锆冠进行胶结,第二组采用自粘双固化树脂水门合剂(Calibra Ceram)对氧化锆冠进行胶结。在骨水泥术后2小时和术后14天采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估骨水泥术后敏感性。对冷、热、咬刺激的敏感性进行评估。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估正态性。由于资料非正态分布,组内比较采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验(p < 0.05)。结果:在两次评估中,Fuji I组对冷、热、咬刺激的敏感性评分均高于Calibra Ceram组。从基线到第14天,两组的冷热敏感性均显著降低。对于咬伤敏感性,富士I组观察到明显降低,而Calibra Ceram组的降低没有统计学意义。组间比较显示,Calibra Ceram组在两个时间点对所有测试刺激的敏感性评分均显著降低。结论:在本临床研究的局限性内,自粘树脂骨水泥固化氧化锆冠的骨水泥后敏感性低于传统玻璃离子骨水泥。因此,骨水泥的类型可能会影响氧化锆冠固接术后早期的敏感性和患者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书