Comparative evaluation of the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) and its modified version for early detection of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a pilot study using machine learning techniques.

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2026-06-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000661
Gargee Anand, Ketan Priyadarshi, Bandana Kumari, Jutang Babat Ain Tiewsoh, Rijhul Lahariya
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) and its modified version for early detection of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a pilot study using machine learning techniques.","authors":"Gargee Anand, Ketan Priyadarshi, Bandana Kumari, Jutang Babat Ain Tiewsoh, Rijhul Lahariya","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are a common and serious problem in critically ill patients; their early detecting is challenging. This study evaluated the predictive ability of the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) and its modified form for early identification of CLABSI within two calendar days following central line insertion, using a machine learning approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an analysis of patients who received central line insertion. Inflammatory indices were calculated using laboratory parameters obtained on second day post-insertion. Four machine learning algorithms were applied to evaluate their predictive performance for early CLABSI detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 234 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 39 were confirmed CLABSI cases. We found both indices significantly elevated in the CLABSI group. Modified AISI demonstrated the strongest performance using XGBoost, with the highest area under the ROC curve (0.99), 97% sensitivity and 98% specificity, indicating its potential as the better early screening marker for CLABSI than AISI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both AISI and modified AISI demonstrated strong predictive value for early CLABSI detection, being both accessible and cost-effective. Modified AISI outperformed AISI in predictive performance. These findings support the need for the prospective validation of the modified AISI before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"21 ","pages":"Doc52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13386511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are a common and serious problem in critically ill patients; their early detecting is challenging. This study evaluated the predictive ability of the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) and its modified form for early identification of CLABSI within two calendar days following central line insertion, using a machine learning approach.

Method: We conducted an analysis of patients who received central line insertion. Inflammatory indices were calculated using laboratory parameters obtained on second day post-insertion. Four machine learning algorithms were applied to evaluate their predictive performance for early CLABSI detection.

Results: Among 234 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 39 were confirmed CLABSI cases. We found both indices significantly elevated in the CLABSI group. Modified AISI demonstrated the strongest performance using XGBoost, with the highest area under the ROC curve (0.99), 97% sensitivity and 98% specificity, indicating its potential as the better early screening marker for CLABSI than AISI.

Conclusion: Both AISI and modified AISI demonstrated strong predictive value for early CLABSI detection, being both accessible and cost-effective. Modified AISI outperformed AISI in predictive performance. These findings support the need for the prospective validation of the modified AISI before clinical implementation.

系统性炎症总指数(AISI)及其改进版本用于早期检测中枢线相关血流感染的比较评估:一项使用机器学习技术的试点研究。
背景:中心线相关性血流感染(CLABSI)是危重患者常见且严重的问题;他们的早期检测是具有挑战性的。本研究使用机器学习方法,评估了全身性炎症综合指数(AISI)的预测能力及其改进形式,以便在中心静脉导管插入后两个日历天内早期识别CLABSI。方法:我们对接受中心管插入的患者进行分析。使用注射后第2天获得的实验室参数计算炎症指数。应用四种机器学习算法来评估其早期CLABSI检测的预测性能。结果:234例符合纳入标准的患者中,确诊CLABSI病例39例。我们发现CLABSI组两项指标均显著升高。改良的AISI在XGBoost中表现最好,其ROC曲线下面积最高(0.99),灵敏度为97%,特异性为98%,表明XGBoost作为CLABSI早期筛查指标优于AISI。结论:AISI和改良AISI对CLABSI的早期检测具有较强的预测价值,既可获得又具有成本效益。改进后的AISI在预测性能上优于AISI。这些发现支持在临床应用前对改良AISI进行前瞻性验证的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书