Evaluation of the Prognostic and Therapeutic Factors Affecting Outcomes in Parosteal Osteosarcoma of Bone.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-04-07 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-026-01776-4
Manish Pruthi, Anjana Reddy, Ashish Gulia, Prakash Nayak, Poonam Panjwani, Ajay Puri
{"title":"Evaluation of the Prognostic and Therapeutic Factors Affecting Outcomes in Parosteal Osteosarcoma of Bone.","authors":"Manish Pruthi, Anjana Reddy, Ashish Gulia, Prakash Nayak, Poonam Panjwani, Ajay Puri","doi":"10.1007/s43465-026-01776-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal in treating parosteal osteosarcoma is to achieve wide margins while minimizing morbidity. Marginal resections increase local recurrence (LR) risk. The impact of intramedullary involvement on outcomes remains unclear. We examined the role of quantitative margins and the effect of intramedullary involvement  on LR  and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 42 surgically treated parosteal osteosarcoma cases over 20 years (2000-2020) at a tertiary cancer centre. Final histopathology confirmed low-grade tumors in 39 cases and dedifferentiated in 3. Of 39 patients, 2 had amputations and 37 underwent limb salvage. Eight needed intra-operative vascular reconstruction. Quantitative margins were assessed in 25 primary cases with adequate follow-up: 10 had margins < 2 mm, 15 had ≥ 2 mm; 15 had margins < 5 mm, 10 had ≥ 5 mm. Among 37 patients with follow-up, 31 are alive and disease-free (22 continuously disease-free), while 6 have died (5 due to disease, 1 cardiac event). Median follow-up was 108 months (range 27-273).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients had LR. Margins of ≤ 2 mm versus > 2 mm did not significantly influence outcomes, indicating that simply exceeding 2 mm was not associated with improved local control. However, a critical threshold effect was observed at ≥ 5 mm, as no patients with margins ≥ 5 mm developed local recurrence (LR). Three had isolated LR, seven combined relapses (LR + distant). Of these ten, five are alive and disease-free, four died of disease, one died of cardiac event. Intramedullary involvement did not affect LR (p = 0.69) but had a trend towards poor disease specific survival (DSS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The above findings underscore that achieving margins ≥ 5 mm represents a clinically meaningful cutoff, beyond which the risk of local or combined relapse is minimized, supporting ≥ 5 mm as the optimal target for oncologic resection margins. Intramedullary involvement and LR have a trend towards poor DSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"60 7","pages":"1641-1653"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13385554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-026-01776-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The goal in treating parosteal osteosarcoma is to achieve wide margins while minimizing morbidity. Marginal resections increase local recurrence (LR) risk. The impact of intramedullary involvement on outcomes remains unclear. We examined the role of quantitative margins and the effect of intramedullary involvement  on LR  and outcomes.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 42 surgically treated parosteal osteosarcoma cases over 20 years (2000-2020) at a tertiary cancer centre. Final histopathology confirmed low-grade tumors in 39 cases and dedifferentiated in 3. Of 39 patients, 2 had amputations and 37 underwent limb salvage. Eight needed intra-operative vascular reconstruction. Quantitative margins were assessed in 25 primary cases with adequate follow-up: 10 had margins < 2 mm, 15 had ≥ 2 mm; 15 had margins < 5 mm, 10 had ≥ 5 mm. Among 37 patients with follow-up, 31 are alive and disease-free (22 continuously disease-free), while 6 have died (5 due to disease, 1 cardiac event). Median follow-up was 108 months (range 27-273).

Results: Ten patients had LR. Margins of ≤ 2 mm versus > 2 mm did not significantly influence outcomes, indicating that simply exceeding 2 mm was not associated with improved local control. However, a critical threshold effect was observed at ≥ 5 mm, as no patients with margins ≥ 5 mm developed local recurrence (LR). Three had isolated LR, seven combined relapses (LR + distant). Of these ten, five are alive and disease-free, four died of disease, one died of cardiac event. Intramedullary involvement did not affect LR (p = 0.69) but had a trend towards poor disease specific survival (DSS).

Conclusion: The above findings underscore that achieving margins ≥ 5 mm represents a clinically meaningful cutoff, beyond which the risk of local or combined relapse is minimized, supporting ≥ 5 mm as the optimal target for oncologic resection margins. Intramedullary involvement and LR have a trend towards poor DSS.

影响骨旁骨肉瘤预后和治疗因素的评价。
目的:治疗骨旁骨肉瘤的目的是在降低发病率的同时获得更大的切缘。边缘切除增加局部复发风险。髓内受累对预后的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了定量边缘的作用和髓内受累对LR和预后的影响。方法:我们对一家三级癌症中心20年来(2000-2020年)42例手术治疗的骨旁骨肉瘤病例进行了回顾性分析。最终组织病理学证实低级别肿瘤39例,去分化3例。39例患者中,截肢2例,残肢37例。8例需要术中血管重建。定量边缘评估25例原发病例,随访充分:10例有边缘结果:10例有LR。切缘≤2mm与切缘≤2mm对结果没有显著影响,这表明仅仅超过2mm与局部控制的改善无关。然而,≥5 mm处观察到临界阈值效应,因为≥5 mm的患者没有发生局部复发(LR)。3例为孤立性LR, 7例为联合复发(LR +远处)。在这10人中,5人存活且无病,4人死于疾病,1人死于心脏事件。髓内受累不影响LR (p = 0.69),但有疾病特异性生存(DSS)差的趋势。结论:上述研究结果强调,≥5mm的切缘是一个具有临床意义的临界值,超过这个临界值,局部或联合复发的风险最小,支持≥5mm作为肿瘤切缘的最佳靶点。髓内受累和LR倾向于较差的DSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书