When skin color/race and education matter: disparities in obesity among Brazilians (2013-2019).

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Luciana Alves de Medeiros, Letícia Martins Okada, Luciana Saraiva da Silva, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Catarina Machado Azeredo
{"title":"When skin color/race and education matter: disparities in obesity among Brazilians (2013-2019).","authors":"Luciana Alves de Medeiros, Letícia Martins Okada, Luciana Saraiva da Silva, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Catarina Machado Azeredo","doi":"10.1186/s12939-026-02930-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the growing burden of obesity in middle-income settings, evidence integrating socioeconomic and racial dimensions remains insufficient. This study examined educational inequalities in obesity prevalence among Brazilian adults in 2013 and 2019, assessing intersections with race/skin color and sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study with a representative sample of Brazilian adults aged ≥ 23 years, using data from the National Health Survey (PNS), 2013 and 2019 editions. Obesity was assessed using BMI, calculated from self-identified weight and height. Descriptive data and complex measures of inequality (Slope Index of Inequality - SII and Relative Index of Inequality - RII) were used. Analyses were stratified by sex, race/skin color, and educational level, with an intersectional approach when analytically possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A difference in the magnitude of relative educational inequality was observed only for Brown women (RII = 0.5 in 2013 and 0.7 in 2019), largely reflecting greater increases in obesity prevalence among women with secondary and tertiary education. Among Black men, both absolute and relative inequality were higher in 2019 survey than in 2013, with a shift in higher obesity prevalence from the less educated to the more educated. In 2019, White and Brown women showed negative SII values (-15.0 and - 9.7, respectively) and RII values less than one (0.5 and 0.7, respectively), indicating a lower obesity prevalence among those with higher educational attainment, which was not significant for Black women. Among men, educational inequality was greater for Black and Brown individuals, with higher obesity prevalence among the more educated (SII = 9.9 and 8.5, respectively); among White men, there was no significant inequality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Educational inequality in obesity prevalence in Brazil shows patterns consistent with the nutritional transition observed in high-income countries with higher obesity prevalences among less educated subgroups. However, racial intersections revealed significant differences, placing Black and Brown individuals at a disadvantage in both sexes. Among women, education appears to have a less protective effect against obesity among Black women, whereas among men-where a positive educational gradient in obesity is commonly observed-this pattern is more pronounced among Black and Brown men.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02930-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the growing burden of obesity in middle-income settings, evidence integrating socioeconomic and racial dimensions remains insufficient. This study examined educational inequalities in obesity prevalence among Brazilian adults in 2013 and 2019, assessing intersections with race/skin color and sex.

Methods: Cross-sectional study with a representative sample of Brazilian adults aged ≥ 23 years, using data from the National Health Survey (PNS), 2013 and 2019 editions. Obesity was assessed using BMI, calculated from self-identified weight and height. Descriptive data and complex measures of inequality (Slope Index of Inequality - SII and Relative Index of Inequality - RII) were used. Analyses were stratified by sex, race/skin color, and educational level, with an intersectional approach when analytically possible.

Results: A difference in the magnitude of relative educational inequality was observed only for Brown women (RII = 0.5 in 2013 and 0.7 in 2019), largely reflecting greater increases in obesity prevalence among women with secondary and tertiary education. Among Black men, both absolute and relative inequality were higher in 2019 survey than in 2013, with a shift in higher obesity prevalence from the less educated to the more educated. In 2019, White and Brown women showed negative SII values (-15.0 and - 9.7, respectively) and RII values less than one (0.5 and 0.7, respectively), indicating a lower obesity prevalence among those with higher educational attainment, which was not significant for Black women. Among men, educational inequality was greater for Black and Brown individuals, with higher obesity prevalence among the more educated (SII = 9.9 and 8.5, respectively); among White men, there was no significant inequality.

Conclusion: Educational inequality in obesity prevalence in Brazil shows patterns consistent with the nutritional transition observed in high-income countries with higher obesity prevalences among less educated subgroups. However, racial intersections revealed significant differences, placing Black and Brown individuals at a disadvantage in both sexes. Among women, education appears to have a less protective effect against obesity among Black women, whereas among men-where a positive educational gradient in obesity is commonly observed-this pattern is more pronounced among Black and Brown men.

当肤色/种族和教育重要时:巴西人肥胖的差异(2013-2019)。
背景:尽管中等收入国家的肥胖负担日益加重,但整合社会经济和种族因素的证据仍然不足。这项研究调查了2013年和2019年巴西成年人肥胖患病率的教育不平等,评估了种族/肤色和性别之间的交集。方法:采用2013年和2019年国家健康调查(PNS)的数据,对年龄≥23岁的巴西成年人的代表性样本进行横断面研究。肥胖是通过BMI来评估的,BMI是根据自我确认的体重和身高计算出来的。使用描述性数据和不平等的复杂度量(不平等斜率指数- SII和相对不平等指数- RII)。分析按性别、种族/肤色和教育水平分层,在分析可能的情况下采用交叉方法。结果:仅在棕色女性中观察到相对教育不平等程度的差异(2013年的RII = 0.5, 2019年的RII = 0.7),这在很大程度上反映了中等和高等教育女性中肥胖患病率的增加。在黑人男性中,2019年的绝对和相对不平等程度都高于2013年,肥胖患病率从受教育程度较低的人群向受教育程度较高的人群转变。2019年,白人和棕色人种女性的SII值为负(分别为-15.0和- 9.7),RII值小于1(分别为0.5和0.7),表明受教育程度较高的女性肥胖率较低,这对黑人女性来说并不显著。在男性中,黑人和棕色人种的教育不平等更大,受教育程度越高的人肥胖患病率越高(SII分别= 9.9和8.5);在白人男性中,没有明显的不平等。结论:巴西肥胖患病率的教育不平等与高收入国家中受教育程度较低的亚群体中肥胖患病率较高的营养转变模式一致。然而,种族交叉显示了显著的差异,黑人和棕色人种在两性中都处于劣势。在女性中,教育对黑人女性肥胖的保护作用较弱,而在男性中,这种模式在黑人和棕色人种男性中更为明显,在男性中,肥胖的教育程度呈正梯度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书