Emma Louwagie, Michelle C Arnett, Aparna Ingleshwar, Mike T John, Danna R Paulson, Yvette G Reibel, Phonsuda Chanthavisouk
{"title":"Oral health-related quality of life in patients receiving dental treatment from dental therapists.","authors":"Emma Louwagie, Michelle C Arnett, Aparna Ingleshwar, Mike T John, Danna R Paulson, Yvette G Reibel, Phonsuda Chanthavisouk","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02572-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) measured by the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5) allows characterization of patients' oral health impact into normative values in a university setting. This study aims to derive OHIP-5 normative values for patients seeking care from the dual degree student provider of the dental hygienist and dental therapist in Minnesota.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Normative OHIP-5 values were determined in n = 2,835 patients at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, representing sample-based reference distributions. Summary scores were analysed using an empirical cumulative distribution function, with the 90th percentile threshold indicating typical versus elevated impact, while dimensional scores (Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact) assessed as elevated impact were considered frequent item response categories \"fairly often\" or \"very often\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vast majority (90%) of patients seeking care from the dual degree student providers presented an OHIP-5 score of 6 or less, characterizing OHIP-5 scores of 7-20 points as \"non-typically elevated\". The \"non-typically elevated\" dimension scores occurred in 7% of patients for Oral Function, 6% for Orofacial Pain, 11% for Orofacial Appearance, and 2% for Psychosocial Impacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding normative OHIP-5 values in patient populations treated by dual degree student providers in dental school settings supports clinical decision-making by guiding diagnostic, referral, and treatment pathways. Their role in preventive and restorative care advances patient-centered outcomes, aligning with the quadruple aim of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02572-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) measured by the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5) allows characterization of patients' oral health impact into normative values in a university setting. This study aims to derive OHIP-5 normative values for patients seeking care from the dual degree student provider of the dental hygienist and dental therapist in Minnesota.
Methods: Normative OHIP-5 values were determined in n = 2,835 patients at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, representing sample-based reference distributions. Summary scores were analysed using an empirical cumulative distribution function, with the 90th percentile threshold indicating typical versus elevated impact, while dimensional scores (Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact) assessed as elevated impact were considered frequent item response categories "fairly often" or "very often".
Results: The vast majority (90%) of patients seeking care from the dual degree student providers presented an OHIP-5 score of 6 or less, characterizing OHIP-5 scores of 7-20 points as "non-typically elevated". The "non-typically elevated" dimension scores occurred in 7% of patients for Oral Function, 6% for Orofacial Pain, 11% for Orofacial Appearance, and 2% for Psychosocial Impacts.
Conclusion: Understanding normative OHIP-5 values in patient populations treated by dual degree student providers in dental school settings supports clinical decision-making by guiding diagnostic, referral, and treatment pathways. Their role in preventive and restorative care advances patient-centered outcomes, aligning with the quadruple aim of healthcare.
期刊介绍:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.