Claire J Creutzfeldt, Lyndia C Brumback, Jennifer Im, Kathryn I Pollak, Ana Gabriela Vasconcelos, Yilin Song, James Sibley, Anna M Ungar, Gigi Garzio, Patsy D Treece, Lisa Maki Hudson, Rebecca Martini, Sandy Hanson, Nita Khandelwal, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Elie Azoulay, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis
{"title":"Facilitating Communication for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients During and Following a Hospital Stay: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Claire J Creutzfeldt, Lyndia C Brumback, Jennifer Im, Kathryn I Pollak, Ana Gabriela Vasconcelos, Yilin Song, James Sibley, Anna M Ungar, Gigi Garzio, Patsy D Treece, Lisa Maki Hudson, Rebecca Martini, Sandy Hanson, Nita Khandelwal, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Elie Azoulay, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Families of patients admitted to ICUs experience numerous care transitions, poor communication across these transitions, and emotional distress associated, in part, with the challenges of obtaining care consistent with patients' values. Specialized support from ICU to postacute setting may improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a \"communication facilitator\" intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One healthcare system, three hospitals in Seattle, WA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>ICU patients ( n = 449) with chronic life-limiting illness (2-yr median survival, and/or acute, severe illness with greater than 15% hospital mortality risk) and their family members ( n = 505). Patients were the unit of randomization (control, n = 224; intervention, n = 225).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Nurse communication facilitators trained to support, model, and teach communication strategies to promote goal-concordant care. Facilitators engaged with participants in the ICU and for 3 months postrandomization.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was family member depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at four time points (randomization, 1-, 3-, and 6-mo postrandomization). Among respondents, HADS-depression tended to decrease over time (mean ± sd = 7.2 ± 4.6 for control and 7.2 ± 4.2 for intervention at baseline; 5.9 ± 4.1 for control and 5.9 ± 4.5 for intervention at 6 mo). The difference in mean HADS-depression between intervention and control over 6 mo was not significantly different: -0.07 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.55). Differences in family-reported secondary outcomes were in the expected direction, including relationship with the healthcare team ( p = 0.0162) and goal concordance ( p = 0.0504), but their effect sizes were small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For family members of critically ill patients facing a high likelihood of death or serious disability, involving a communication facilitator during and after an ICU stay did not lead to a reduction in depressive symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2521-2535"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007268","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Families of patients admitted to ICUs experience numerous care transitions, poor communication across these transitions, and emotional distress associated, in part, with the challenges of obtaining care consistent with patients' values. Specialized support from ICU to postacute setting may improve outcomes.
Design: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a "communication facilitator" intervention.
Setting: One healthcare system, three hospitals in Seattle, WA.
Participants: ICU patients ( n = 449) with chronic life-limiting illness (2-yr median survival, and/or acute, severe illness with greater than 15% hospital mortality risk) and their family members ( n = 505). Patients were the unit of randomization (control, n = 224; intervention, n = 225).
Interventions: Nurse communication facilitators trained to support, model, and teach communication strategies to promote goal-concordant care. Facilitators engaged with participants in the ICU and for 3 months postrandomization.
Measurement and main results: The primary outcome was family member depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at four time points (randomization, 1-, 3-, and 6-mo postrandomization). Among respondents, HADS-depression tended to decrease over time (mean ± sd = 7.2 ± 4.6 for control and 7.2 ± 4.2 for intervention at baseline; 5.9 ± 4.1 for control and 5.9 ± 4.5 for intervention at 6 mo). The difference in mean HADS-depression between intervention and control over 6 mo was not significantly different: -0.07 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.55). Differences in family-reported secondary outcomes were in the expected direction, including relationship with the healthcare team ( p = 0.0162) and goal concordance ( p = 0.0504), but their effect sizes were small.
Conclusions: For family members of critically ill patients facing a high likelihood of death or serious disability, involving a communication facilitator during and after an ICU stay did not lead to a reduction in depressive symptoms.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.