Facilitating Communication for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients During and Following a Hospital Stay: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-22 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000007268
Claire J Creutzfeldt, Lyndia C Brumback, Jennifer Im, Kathryn I Pollak, Ana Gabriela Vasconcelos, Yilin Song, James Sibley, Anna M Ungar, Gigi Garzio, Patsy D Treece, Lisa Maki Hudson, Rebecca Martini, Sandy Hanson, Nita Khandelwal, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Elie Azoulay, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis
{"title":"Facilitating Communication for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients During and Following a Hospital Stay: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Claire J Creutzfeldt, Lyndia C Brumback, Jennifer Im, Kathryn I Pollak, Ana Gabriela Vasconcelos, Yilin Song, James Sibley, Anna M Ungar, Gigi Garzio, Patsy D Treece, Lisa Maki Hudson, Rebecca Martini, Sandy Hanson, Nita Khandelwal, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Elie Azoulay, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Families of patients admitted to ICUs experience numerous care transitions, poor communication across these transitions, and emotional distress associated, in part, with the challenges of obtaining care consistent with patients' values. Specialized support from ICU to postacute setting may improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a \"communication facilitator\" intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One healthcare system, three hospitals in Seattle, WA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>ICU patients ( n = 449) with chronic life-limiting illness (2-yr median survival, and/or acute, severe illness with greater than 15% hospital mortality risk) and their family members ( n = 505). Patients were the unit of randomization (control, n = 224; intervention, n = 225).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Nurse communication facilitators trained to support, model, and teach communication strategies to promote goal-concordant care. Facilitators engaged with participants in the ICU and for 3 months postrandomization.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was family member depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at four time points (randomization, 1-, 3-, and 6-mo postrandomization). Among respondents, HADS-depression tended to decrease over time (mean ± sd = 7.2 ± 4.6 for control and 7.2 ± 4.2 for intervention at baseline; 5.9 ± 4.1 for control and 5.9 ± 4.5 for intervention at 6 mo). The difference in mean HADS-depression between intervention and control over 6 mo was not significantly different: -0.07 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.55). Differences in family-reported secondary outcomes were in the expected direction, including relationship with the healthcare team ( p = 0.0162) and goal concordance ( p = 0.0504), but their effect sizes were small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For family members of critically ill patients facing a high likelihood of death or serious disability, involving a communication facilitator during and after an ICU stay did not lead to a reduction in depressive symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2521-2535"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007268","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Families of patients admitted to ICUs experience numerous care transitions, poor communication across these transitions, and emotional distress associated, in part, with the challenges of obtaining care consistent with patients' values. Specialized support from ICU to postacute setting may improve outcomes.

Design: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a "communication facilitator" intervention.

Setting: One healthcare system, three hospitals in Seattle, WA.

Participants: ICU patients ( n = 449) with chronic life-limiting illness (2-yr median survival, and/or acute, severe illness with greater than 15% hospital mortality risk) and their family members ( n = 505). Patients were the unit of randomization (control, n = 224; intervention, n = 225).

Interventions: Nurse communication facilitators trained to support, model, and teach communication strategies to promote goal-concordant care. Facilitators engaged with participants in the ICU and for 3 months postrandomization.

Measurement and main results: The primary outcome was family member depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at four time points (randomization, 1-, 3-, and 6-mo postrandomization). Among respondents, HADS-depression tended to decrease over time (mean ± sd = 7.2 ± 4.6 for control and 7.2 ± 4.2 for intervention at baseline; 5.9 ± 4.1 for control and 5.9 ± 4.5 for intervention at 6 mo). The difference in mean HADS-depression between intervention and control over 6 mo was not significantly different: -0.07 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.55). Differences in family-reported secondary outcomes were in the expected direction, including relationship with the healthcare team ( p = 0.0162) and goal concordance ( p = 0.0504), but their effect sizes were small.

Conclusions: For family members of critically ill patients facing a high likelihood of death or serious disability, involving a communication facilitator during and after an ICU stay did not lead to a reduction in depressive symptoms.

促进危重病人家属在住院期间和住院后的沟通:一项随机对照试验
目的:入住icu的患者家庭经历了许多护理转变,在这些转变中沟通不良,以及部分与获得符合患者价值观的护理的挑战相关的情绪困扰。从ICU到急性后环境的专业支持可能改善预后。设计:“沟通促进者”干预的多中心随机对照试验。环境:一个医疗保健系统,三家医院在西雅图,华盛顿州。参与者:患有慢性限制生命疾病(中位生存期为2年,和/或急性、严重疾病,医院死亡风险大于15%)的ICU患者(n = 449)及其家属(n = 505)。患者为随机分组单位(对照组,n = 224;干预组,n = 225)。干预措施:培训护士沟通促进者,以支持、示范和教授沟通策略,以促进目标和谐的护理。在随机分组后的3个月里,辅导员与ICU的参与者进行了交流。测量和主要结果:主要结局是家庭成员抑郁,使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)在四个时间点(随机化、随机化后1个月、3个月和6个月)测量。在被调查者中,hads抑郁倾向随着时间的推移而下降(基线时,对照组的平均值±sd = 7.2±4.6,干预组的平均值为7.2±4.2;6个月时,对照组的平均值为5.9±4.1,干预组的平均值为5.9±4.5)。干预组和对照组在6个月内的平均hads抑郁差异无显著性差异:-0.07 (95% CI, -0.70至0.55)。家庭报告的次要结局的差异符合预期方向,包括与医疗团队的关系(p = 0.0162)和目标一致性(p = 0.0504),但它们的效应量很小。结论:对于面临高可能性死亡或严重残疾的危重患者的家庭成员,在ICU住院期间和之后使用沟通促进者并不会导致抑郁症状的减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书