Comparison of barium sulphate and iohexol for gastrointestinal transit time in Barn owls (Tyto alba).

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Can Nacar, Kamil Serdar Inal, Elif Bagatir Kurban, Hatice Ozlem Nisbet
{"title":"Comparison of barium sulphate and iohexol for gastrointestinal transit time in Barn owls (Tyto alba).","authors":"Can Nacar, Kamil Serdar Inal, Elif Bagatir Kurban, Hatice Ozlem Nisbet","doi":"10.1186/s12917-026-05753-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study is to compare gastrointestinal (GI) transit times and evaluate the adequacy of radiographic opacification of barium sulphate (BaSO<sub>4</sub>) and iohexol in Barn owls (Tyto alba). Eight healthy juvenile owls were included in a randomized crossover study with a 5-day washout period. BaSO<sub>4</sub> (30% w/v) and iohexol (300 mg I/ml, undiluted) were administered in a randomized order to prevent order effects and were administered via orogastric tube at a dosage of 25 ml/kg. Serial radiographs were obtained at specific intervals for up to 300 min. Three independent observers evaluated the images for transit times using a time-blinded protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total transit time (esophagus to cloaca) was significantly shorter for iohexol (5.0 ± 0.0 min) compared to BaSO<sub>4</sub> (15.0 ± 8.4 min) (p = 0.039). Both agents provided adequate radiopacity for clear anatomic differentiation. No adverse effects or contrast-related complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limitations of this study include the small sample size (n = 8) and the use of static radiography rather than fluoroscopy, which precluded real-time motility assessment. Iohexol is a safe and significantly faster alternative to BaSO<sub>4</sub> for GI contrast studies in Barn owls. It is particularly advantageous in emergency cases requiring rapid diagnosis or involving suspected GI perforation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05753-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to compare gastrointestinal (GI) transit times and evaluate the adequacy of radiographic opacification of barium sulphate (BaSO4) and iohexol in Barn owls (Tyto alba). Eight healthy juvenile owls were included in a randomized crossover study with a 5-day washout period. BaSO4 (30% w/v) and iohexol (300 mg I/ml, undiluted) were administered in a randomized order to prevent order effects and were administered via orogastric tube at a dosage of 25 ml/kg. Serial radiographs were obtained at specific intervals for up to 300 min. Three independent observers evaluated the images for transit times using a time-blinded protocol.

Results: Total transit time (esophagus to cloaca) was significantly shorter for iohexol (5.0 ± 0.0 min) compared to BaSO4 (15.0 ± 8.4 min) (p = 0.039). Both agents provided adequate radiopacity for clear anatomic differentiation. No adverse effects or contrast-related complications were observed.

Conclusions: Limitations of this study include the small sample size (n = 8) and the use of static radiography rather than fluoroscopy, which precluded real-time motility assessment. Iohexol is a safe and significantly faster alternative to BaSO4 for GI contrast studies in Barn owls. It is particularly advantageous in emergency cases requiring rapid diagnosis or involving suspected GI perforation.

硫酸钡和碘己醇对仓鸮胃肠运输时间的影响。
背景:本研究的目的是比较仓鸮(Tyto alba)的胃肠道(GI)传输时间,并评估硫酸钡(BaSO4)和碘己醇的放射影像混浊的适当性。8只健康的幼猫头鹰被纳入一项随机交叉研究,有5天的洗脱期。BaSO4 (30% w/v)和碘己醇(300 mg I/ml,未稀释)按随机顺序给药,以防止顺序效应,剂量为25 ml/kg,经胃管给药。连续x线片以特定间隔拍摄,最长可达300分钟。三名独立的观测者使用时间盲法评估图像的过境时间。结果:碘己醇(5.0±0.0 min)比BaSO4(15.0±8.4 min)的总传输时间(p = 0.039)短(p = 0.039)。两种药物都提供了足够的放射线透明度,以明确解剖分化。未观察到不良反应或对比相关并发症。结论:本研究的局限性包括样本量小(n = 8),使用静态x线摄影而不是透视,这妨碍了实时运动评估。碘己醇是一种安全且明显更快的替代BaSO4用于谷仓猫头鹰的GI对比研究。在需要快速诊断或涉及疑似胃肠道穿孔的紧急病例中尤其有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书