Decoding the safety matrix: A conceptualisation of safety indicator-based variables for highway prediction models

IF 9.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Loretta Bortey, David J. Edwards, Chris Roberts, Iain Mark Rillie
{"title":"Decoding the safety matrix: A conceptualisation of safety indicator-based variables for highway prediction models","authors":"Loretta Bortey,&nbsp;David J. Edwards,&nbsp;Chris Roberts,&nbsp;Iain Mark Rillie","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the success of machine learning (ML) in safety risk prediction across various industries, there is scant evidence to prove that variables used are reliable indicators of safety performance. This study provides a conceptual framework for identifying safety indicators and formulating variables from these indicators that will optimise the quality of data used for risk modelling for Highways Traffic Officers (HTOs). This aligns with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3: Good Health and Well-being, particularly target 3.6, which aims to halve global road traffic deaths and injuries. A mixed philosophical stance was adopted to understand and interpret the literature on safety indicators (SI) from myriad perspectives. A three-phase iterative waterfall approach was adopted which includes: i) PRISMA-based bibliometric search to identify relevant literature; ii) scientometric and cluster analysis to identify significant SIs and key considerations for selecting appropriate indicators for different purposes; iii) grounded theory analysis to synthesise scientific discoveries. Literature on leading and lagging SIs identified pertinent considerations that must be made when selecting SIs for risk modelling (e.g., action and utility). Furthermore, leading and lagging indicators were combined to form resilient indicators that incorporate adaptability into the safety system-thereby increasing safety performance. This paper presents a novel conceptual framework for HTOs which inculcates resilient measures in SI selection for adaptability and recovery purposes; and a robust method of integrating leading and lagging indicators to create resilience. Cumulatively, the research presents the first study to provide detailed guidance on the specific criteria of ML variables significant for risk modelling and prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 912-937"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209575642600070X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the success of machine learning (ML) in safety risk prediction across various industries, there is scant evidence to prove that variables used are reliable indicators of safety performance. This study provides a conceptual framework for identifying safety indicators and formulating variables from these indicators that will optimise the quality of data used for risk modelling for Highways Traffic Officers (HTOs). This aligns with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3: Good Health and Well-being, particularly target 3.6, which aims to halve global road traffic deaths and injuries. A mixed philosophical stance was adopted to understand and interpret the literature on safety indicators (SI) from myriad perspectives. A three-phase iterative waterfall approach was adopted which includes: i) PRISMA-based bibliometric search to identify relevant literature; ii) scientometric and cluster analysis to identify significant SIs and key considerations for selecting appropriate indicators for different purposes; iii) grounded theory analysis to synthesise scientific discoveries. Literature on leading and lagging SIs identified pertinent considerations that must be made when selecting SIs for risk modelling (e.g., action and utility). Furthermore, leading and lagging indicators were combined to form resilient indicators that incorporate adaptability into the safety system-thereby increasing safety performance. This paper presents a novel conceptual framework for HTOs which inculcates resilient measures in SI selection for adaptability and recovery purposes; and a robust method of integrating leading and lagging indicators to create resilience. Cumulatively, the research presents the first study to provide detailed guidance on the specific criteria of ML variables significant for risk modelling and prediction.
解码安全矩阵:公路预测模型中基于安全指标的变量的概念化
尽管机器学习(ML)在各个行业的安全风险预测中取得了成功,但很少有证据证明所使用的变量是安全绩效的可靠指标。本研究为确定安全指标和从这些指标中制定变量提供了一个概念性框架,这些指标将优化用于公路交通人员(HTOs)风险建模的数据质量。这符合可持续发展目标3:良好健康和福祉,特别是具体目标3.6,该目标旨在将全球道路交通死亡和伤害减少一半。采用一种混合的哲学立场,从无数的角度来理解和解释安全指标(SI)的文献。采用三阶段迭代瀑布方法,包括:i)基于prisma的文献计量检索,识别相关文献;ii)科学计量学和聚类分析,以确定重要的si和为不同目的选择适当指标的关键考虑因素;Iii)综合科学发现的扎根理论分析。关于领先和落后si的文献确定了在选择si进行风险建模时必须考虑的相关因素(例如,行动和效用)。此外,将领先指标和滞后指标结合起来,形成弹性指标,将适应性纳入安全系统,从而提高安全绩效。本文提出了一个新的概念框架,为适应性和恢复目的在SI选择中灌输弹性措施;以及一种整合领先指标和滞后指标的稳健方法,以创造弹性。总的来说,该研究首次为ML变量的具体标准提供了详细的指导,这些变量对风险建模和预测具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.30%
发文量
402
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书