Loretta Bortey, David J. Edwards, Chris Roberts, Iain Mark Rillie
{"title":"Decoding the safety matrix: A conceptualisation of safety indicator-based variables for highway prediction models","authors":"Loretta Bortey, David J. Edwards, Chris Roberts, Iain Mark Rillie","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the success of machine learning (ML) in safety risk prediction across various industries, there is scant evidence to prove that variables used are reliable indicators of safety performance. This study provides a conceptual framework for identifying safety indicators and formulating variables from these indicators that will optimise the quality of data used for risk modelling for Highways Traffic Officers (HTOs). This aligns with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3: Good Health and Well-being, particularly target 3.6, which aims to halve global road traffic deaths and injuries. A mixed philosophical stance was adopted to understand and interpret the literature on safety indicators (SI) from myriad perspectives. A three-phase iterative waterfall approach was adopted which includes: i) PRISMA-based bibliometric search to identify relevant literature; ii) scientometric and cluster analysis to identify significant SIs and key considerations for selecting appropriate indicators for different purposes; iii) grounded theory analysis to synthesise scientific discoveries. Literature on leading and lagging SIs identified pertinent considerations that must be made when selecting SIs for risk modelling (e.g., action and utility). Furthermore, leading and lagging indicators were combined to form resilient indicators that incorporate adaptability into the safety system-thereby increasing safety performance. This paper presents a novel conceptual framework for HTOs which inculcates resilient measures in SI selection for adaptability and recovery purposes; and a robust method of integrating leading and lagging indicators to create resilience. Cumulatively, the research presents the first study to provide detailed guidance on the specific criteria of ML variables significant for risk modelling and prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 912-937"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209575642600070X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the success of machine learning (ML) in safety risk prediction across various industries, there is scant evidence to prove that variables used are reliable indicators of safety performance. This study provides a conceptual framework for identifying safety indicators and formulating variables from these indicators that will optimise the quality of data used for risk modelling for Highways Traffic Officers (HTOs). This aligns with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3: Good Health and Well-being, particularly target 3.6, which aims to halve global road traffic deaths and injuries. A mixed philosophical stance was adopted to understand and interpret the literature on safety indicators (SI) from myriad perspectives. A three-phase iterative waterfall approach was adopted which includes: i) PRISMA-based bibliometric search to identify relevant literature; ii) scientometric and cluster analysis to identify significant SIs and key considerations for selecting appropriate indicators for different purposes; iii) grounded theory analysis to synthesise scientific discoveries. Literature on leading and lagging SIs identified pertinent considerations that must be made when selecting SIs for risk modelling (e.g., action and utility). Furthermore, leading and lagging indicators were combined to form resilient indicators that incorporate adaptability into the safety system-thereby increasing safety performance. This paper presents a novel conceptual framework for HTOs which inculcates resilient measures in SI selection for adaptability and recovery purposes; and a robust method of integrating leading and lagging indicators to create resilience. Cumulatively, the research presents the first study to provide detailed guidance on the specific criteria of ML variables significant for risk modelling and prediction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.