LONGITUDINAL JOINT SPACE WIDTH MEASURES AND RISK OF KNEE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC AND RADIOGRAPHIC KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: DATA FROM OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE

Osteoarthritis imaging Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ostima.2026.100427
H Cen, Q Dang, A Akba, Z Wang, H Chen, Y Zhang, G Ruan, P Cao, Z Zhu, C Ding
{"title":"LONGITUDINAL JOINT SPACE WIDTH MEASURES AND RISK OF KNEE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC AND RADIOGRAPHIC KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: DATA FROM OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE","authors":"H Cen,&nbsp;Q Dang,&nbsp;A Akba,&nbsp;Z Wang,&nbsp;H Chen,&nbsp;Y Zhang,&nbsp;G Ruan,&nbsp;P Cao,&nbsp;Z Zhu,&nbsp;C Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2026.100427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Although previous studies have shown that baseline joint space width (JSW) and its short-term change are associated with knee replacement (KR) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), it remains unclear whether the longitudinal trajectory of JSW is associated with KR risk.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To evaluate the associations of longitudinal trajectories of minimum JSW (mJSW) and JSW at x = 0.250 (JSW250) in the medial tibiofemoral compartment with the risk of KR among patients with symptomatic (frequent knee symptoms for at least one month in the past 12 months) and radiographic knee OA (Kellgren–Lawrence grade 2 or 3).</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database, in which JSW was measured from baseline to the 4th visit, and again at the 6th and 8th visits, with KR status recorded over 9 visits, we applied a Bayesian joint model of longitudinal and time-to-event data to determine the association of longitudinal mJSW and JSW250 with KR risk. JSW measures were standardized to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) per 1‑SD increase. Joint models are preferred for simultaneous analysis of repeated measurements and survival data, providing less biased estimates.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>A total of 729 participants with baseline and at least one follow‑up measurement for both JSW metrics were included. After a median follow‑up of 8.84 years, 118 participants (15.97%) underwent KR. The Bayesian joint model showed that, at any time point, higher values of both measures were associated with a reduced risk of KR. Specifically, the HR per 1‑SD increase was 0.70 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.56–0.86) for mJSW and 0.60 (95% CrI: 0.49–0.75) for JSW250, indicating a stronger protective association for JSW250.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Repeated measurements of mJSW and JSW250 provide strong longitudinal associations with KR risk, with JSW250 showing a more pronounced effect. These findings underscore the value of regular monitoring of JSW measures, particularly JSW250, in clinical practice to facilitate timely identification of knee OA patients at high risk for KR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654126000371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although previous studies have shown that baseline joint space width (JSW) and its short-term change are associated with knee replacement (KR) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), it remains unclear whether the longitudinal trajectory of JSW is associated with KR risk.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associations of longitudinal trajectories of minimum JSW (mJSW) and JSW at x = 0.250 (JSW250) in the medial tibiofemoral compartment with the risk of KR among patients with symptomatic (frequent knee symptoms for at least one month in the past 12 months) and radiographic knee OA (Kellgren–Lawrence grade 2 or 3).

METHODS

Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database, in which JSW was measured from baseline to the 4th visit, and again at the 6th and 8th visits, with KR status recorded over 9 visits, we applied a Bayesian joint model of longitudinal and time-to-event data to determine the association of longitudinal mJSW and JSW250 with KR risk. JSW measures were standardized to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) per 1‑SD increase. Joint models are preferred for simultaneous analysis of repeated measurements and survival data, providing less biased estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 729 participants with baseline and at least one follow‑up measurement for both JSW metrics were included. After a median follow‑up of 8.84 years, 118 participants (15.97%) underwent KR. The Bayesian joint model showed that, at any time point, higher values of both measures were associated with a reduced risk of KR. Specifically, the HR per 1‑SD increase was 0.70 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.56–0.86) for mJSW and 0.60 (95% CrI: 0.49–0.75) for JSW250, indicating a stronger protective association for JSW250.

CONCLUSION

Repeated measurements of mJSW and JSW250 provide strong longitudinal associations with KR risk, with JSW250 showing a more pronounced effect. These findings underscore the value of regular monitoring of JSW measures, particularly JSW250, in clinical practice to facilitate timely identification of knee OA patients at high risk for KR.
有症状和影像学表现的膝骨关节炎患者的纵向关节间隙宽度测量和膝关节置换术的风险:来自骨关节炎倡议的数据
虽然先前的研究表明基线关节间隙宽度(JSW)及其短期变化与膝关节置换术(KR)相关,但JSW的纵向轨迹是否与KR风险相关尚不清楚。目的评估有症状(过去12个月内至少1个月频繁出现膝关节症状)和x = 0.250 (JSW250)的胫骨内侧股骨头间室最小JSW (mJSW)和JSW纵向轨迹与膝关节骨性关节炎(Kellgren-Lawrence分级2级或3级)患者发生KR风险的关系。方法利用骨关节炎倡议(OAI)数据库的数据,从基线到第4次就诊,在第6次和第8次就诊时测量JSW,并在9次就诊时记录KR状态,我们应用纵向和事件时间数据的贝叶斯联合模型来确定纵向mJSW和JSW250与KR风险的关系。对JSW措施进行标准化,以获得每增加1 SD的风险比(hr)。联合模型适用于同时分析重复测量和生存数据,提供较少偏差的估计。结果共纳入729名参与者,他们具有基线和至少一次JSW指标的随访测量。经过8.84年的中位随访,118名参与者(15.97%)接受了KR,贝叶斯联合模型显示,在任何时间点,两项指标的值越高,KR风险越低,mJSW每增加1个标准差的HR为0.70(95%可信区间[CrI]: 0.56-0.86), JSW250每增加1个标准差的HR为0.60(95%可信区间[CrI]: 0.49-0.75),表明JSW250具有更强的保护作用。结论重复测量mJSW和JSW250与KR风险有很强的纵向相关性,其中JSW250的影响更明显。这些发现强调了在临床实践中定期监测JSW指标的价值,特别是JSW250,有助于及时识别KR高风险的膝关节OA患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书