The value appropriation gap in developing dynamic capabilities from marketing crowdsourcing

IF 7.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-11 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.07.001
Valentina Kirova, Poonam Oberoi
{"title":"The value appropriation gap in developing dynamic capabilities from marketing crowdsourcing","authors":"Valentina Kirova,&nbsp;Poonam Oberoi","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the crowdsourcing of marketing activities offers firms access to external knowledge, its potential to enhance dynamic capabilities (sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring) lacks empirical investigation. Drawing on dynamic capabilities theory and using an exploratory qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants, including marketing managers and crowdsourcing platform managers. Our findings reveal a persistent discrepancy between the potential value of crowdsourced insights and their actual integration into dynamic capabilities, conceptualized as the value appropriation gap. This gap arises from systemic friction when firms attempt to assimilate heterogeneous, externally generated insights with internal, firm-specific knowledge. We identify two interconnected barriers fueling this gap: cognitive biases, which distort the assimilation of external input, and ordinary capabilities, which can become structural barriers inhibiting innovation. By formalizing the value appropriation gap, we introduce a crowd-contextualized mechanism explaining why firms often fail to fully leverage external knowledge for competitive advantage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"136 ","pages":"Pages 287-302"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850126001070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the crowdsourcing of marketing activities offers firms access to external knowledge, its potential to enhance dynamic capabilities (sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring) lacks empirical investigation. Drawing on dynamic capabilities theory and using an exploratory qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants, including marketing managers and crowdsourcing platform managers. Our findings reveal a persistent discrepancy between the potential value of crowdsourced insights and their actual integration into dynamic capabilities, conceptualized as the value appropriation gap. This gap arises from systemic friction when firms attempt to assimilate heterogeneous, externally generated insights with internal, firm-specific knowledge. We identify two interconnected barriers fueling this gap: cognitive biases, which distort the assimilation of external input, and ordinary capabilities, which can become structural barriers inhibiting innovation. By formalizing the value appropriation gap, we introduce a crowd-contextualized mechanism explaining why firms often fail to fully leverage external knowledge for competitive advantage.
从营销众包发展动态能力的价值占有差距
虽然营销活动的众包为企业提供了获取外部知识的途径,但其增强动态能力(感知、把握和重新配置)的潜力缺乏实证研究。利用动态能力理论和探索性定性方法,我们对关键线人进行了半结构化访谈,包括营销经理和众包平台经理。我们的研究结果表明,众包见解的潜在价值与其实际融入动态能力之间存在持续的差异,这种差异被概念化为价值挪用差距。当企业试图将异质的、外部产生的见解与内部的、企业特有的知识同化时,这种差距就产生于系统性摩擦。我们发现了两个相互关联的障碍,助长了这一差距:认知偏见,它扭曲了对外部输入的吸收,以及普通能力,这可能成为抑制创新的结构性障碍。通过形式化价值占有差距,我们引入了一种群体情境化机制,解释了为什么企业经常不能充分利用外部知识来获得竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书