{"title":"The economic viability of spot-spraying for pesticides: the case of Northwest Germany","authors":"Jens Schots, Till Kuhn, Niklas Möhring","doi":"10.1007/s11119-026-10409-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The reliance on pesticides for crop protection poses significant challenges, including biodiversity loss and environmental pollution. Despite the potential of precision farming technologies such as spot-sprayers for reducing pesticide applications, their adoption remains limited. Previous literature on the economic viability of precision spraying is sparse and did not account for relations between technology availability, prices, land use and adoption decisions. Methods We here analyze and compare the economic viability of different types of smart spot-sprayers for site-specific pesticide applications using a mixed-integer linear programming bio-economic farm model. We apply the model to typical cereal and sugar beet farms in North-Western Germany, which is one of the most productive agricultural regions in Europe. In our analysis, we account for key economic and performance parameters of precision sprayers and check the sensitivity of results regarding assumptions on technology and farm characteristics. Results The findings indicate that real-time spot-spraying of herbicides is economically viable for sugar beet farms exceeding 60-172 ha and cereal farms managing 300-400 ha. The large range of results reflects an important challenge for the adoption of spot sprayers. It highlights the sensitivity of economic viability to changes in technology type and performance and pesticide prices, which are often uncertain for farmers in advance. Broadening the use of the spot sprayer to multiple pesticide types and combining smaller and more precise spot-sprayers with broadcast sprayers improves the economic viability. Conclusions Overall, our results underscore the potential of smart spot-sprayers to contribute to sustainable agricultural practices by reducing pesticide use while maintaining profitability for farmers. Based on our results, we discuss how the adoption of these technologies could be facilitated to achieve environmental goals and improve farm economics.","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-026-10409-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose The reliance on pesticides for crop protection poses significant challenges, including biodiversity loss and environmental pollution. Despite the potential of precision farming technologies such as spot-sprayers for reducing pesticide applications, their adoption remains limited. Previous literature on the economic viability of precision spraying is sparse and did not account for relations between technology availability, prices, land use and adoption decisions. Methods We here analyze and compare the economic viability of different types of smart spot-sprayers for site-specific pesticide applications using a mixed-integer linear programming bio-economic farm model. We apply the model to typical cereal and sugar beet farms in North-Western Germany, which is one of the most productive agricultural regions in Europe. In our analysis, we account for key economic and performance parameters of precision sprayers and check the sensitivity of results regarding assumptions on technology and farm characteristics. Results The findings indicate that real-time spot-spraying of herbicides is economically viable for sugar beet farms exceeding 60-172 ha and cereal farms managing 300-400 ha. The large range of results reflects an important challenge for the adoption of spot sprayers. It highlights the sensitivity of economic viability to changes in technology type and performance and pesticide prices, which are often uncertain for farmers in advance. Broadening the use of the spot sprayer to multiple pesticide types and combining smaller and more precise spot-sprayers with broadcast sprayers improves the economic viability. Conclusions Overall, our results underscore the potential of smart spot-sprayers to contribute to sustainable agricultural practices by reducing pesticide use while maintaining profitability for farmers. Based on our results, we discuss how the adoption of these technologies could be facilitated to achieve environmental goals and improve farm economics.
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.