Analysis of prosthetic outcomes and influencing factors in patients with alveolar bone atrophy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Wei Zhang, Chang'ao Xue, Yan Chen
{"title":"Analysis of prosthetic outcomes and influencing factors in patients with alveolar bone atrophy.","authors":"Wei Zhang, Chang'ao Xue, Yan Chen","doi":"10.2340/aos.v85.46467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate implant-supported prosthetic outcomes and influencing factors in alveolar bone atrophy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty patients with atrophy receiving implants (2021-2022) were followed for 2 years. Success (n = 97, 64.7%) and failure (n = 53, 35.3%) groups were compared using univariate analysis, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with overall failure and Cox regression to assess time to failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate analysis identified age, gender, smoking, implant length, and prosthesis type as significant (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed short implant length (< 10 mm) as the sole independent risk factor for failure (OR = 4.418, p = 0.004); age ≥ 60 years (OR = 2.560, p = 0.094) and female gender (OR = 1.127, p = 0.807) were not significant. Multivariable Cox regression revealed age ≥ 60 years as a significant predictor of earlier failure (HR = 2.558, p = 0.010), while female gender and short implants were not (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant survival differences for age (p = 0.010), gender (p = 0.023), and implant length (p = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short implant independently increases failure risk; age ≥ 60 years accelerates failure. Bone augmentation is preferred. Findings need validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"85 ","pages":"460-468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13392522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.46467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate implant-supported prosthetic outcomes and influencing factors in alveolar bone atrophy.

Material and methods: One hundred and fifty patients with atrophy receiving implants (2021-2022) were followed for 2 years. Success (n = 97, 64.7%) and failure (n = 53, 35.3%) groups were compared using univariate analysis, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with overall failure and Cox regression to assess time to failure.

Results: Univariate analysis identified age, gender, smoking, implant length, and prosthesis type as significant (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed short implant length (< 10 mm) as the sole independent risk factor for failure (OR = 4.418, p = 0.004); age ≥ 60 years (OR = 2.560, p = 0.094) and female gender (OR = 1.127, p = 0.807) were not significant. Multivariable Cox regression revealed age ≥ 60 years as a significant predictor of earlier failure (HR = 2.558, p = 0.010), while female gender and short implants were not (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant survival differences for age (p = 0.010), gender (p = 0.023), and implant length (p = 0.021).

Conclusion: Short implant independently increases failure risk; age ≥ 60 years accelerates failure. Bone augmentation is preferred. Findings need validation.

牙槽骨萎缩患者修复效果及影响因素分析。
目的:探讨种植体支持修复牙槽骨萎缩的疗效及影响因素。材料与方法:对150例接受种植体治疗的萎缩患者(2021-2022)进行为期2年的随访。采用单因素分析对成功组(n = 97, 64.7%)和失败组(n = 53, 35.3%)进行比较,随后采用多因素logistic回归确定与总体失败相关的因素,并采用Cox回归评估失败时间。结果:单因素分析发现年龄、性别、吸烟、种植体长度和假体类型具有显著性(p < 0.05)。多因素logistic回归显示种植体长度较短(0.05)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示年龄(p = 0.010)、性别(p = 0.023)和种植体长度(p = 0.021)的生存差异显著。结论:独立种植体短增加失败风险;年龄≥60岁加速失效。首选骨增强术。研究结果需要验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes papers conveying new knowledge within all areas of oral health and disease sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书