Subhadip Sahoo, Mehrdad Pourjam, Jason R. Mayeur, Kavan Hazeli
{"title":"Microstructure-Informed Analysis Framework for Lattice Structures: Guiding Topology-Material Synergy in Titanium Alloys","authors":"Subhadip Sahoo, Mehrdad Pourjam, Jason R. Mayeur, Kavan Hazeli","doi":"10.1002/adem.202502747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article discusses a microstructure-informed analysis framework for lattice structures that maps the material's microstructural response to guide topology selection and mechanical performance optimization. By coupling geometrical topology with intrinsic material behavior, we demonstrate how anisotropic microstructural response can inform the design of optimized lattice structures. To illustrate this concept, we focus on two distinct classes of titanium alloys: Ti5553 (Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr wt%), which exhibits a predominantly <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\beta$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-phase microstructure, and Ti64 (Ti-6Al-4V wt%), which features a dual-phase <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>α</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>β</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\alpha &#x00026;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;plus;\\beta$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> structure. These alloys exhibit markedly different mechanical responses under multiaxial loading in “fully dense” solid form. The strut-level stress analysis of these alloys reveals how specific microstructural characteristics can guide the selection of appropriate lattice topologies. Two representative lattice configurations, one stretching-dominated and one bending-dominated, are evaluated under identical loading conditions to explore how microstructure-driven design can lead to topology choices that are better suited to accommodate shear or other critical local stress states, thereby enhancing mechanical performance. A strut-level mechanics-based analysis is performed to evaluate shear stress distribution and highlight the role of topology-microstructure synergy and compatibility in determining overall lattice behavior. The findings emphasize the importance of designing structures that are both load-aware and microstructure-responsive, enabling more effective material utilization in advanced engineering applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7275,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Materials","volume":"28 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202502747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article discusses a microstructure-informed analysis framework for lattice structures that maps the material's microstructural response to guide topology selection and mechanical performance optimization. By coupling geometrical topology with intrinsic material behavior, we demonstrate how anisotropic microstructural response can inform the design of optimized lattice structures. To illustrate this concept, we focus on two distinct classes of titanium alloys: Ti5553 (Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr wt%), which exhibits a predominantly -phase microstructure, and Ti64 (Ti-6Al-4V wt%), which features a dual-phase structure. These alloys exhibit markedly different mechanical responses under multiaxial loading in “fully dense” solid form. The strut-level stress analysis of these alloys reveals how specific microstructural characteristics can guide the selection of appropriate lattice topologies. Two representative lattice configurations, one stretching-dominated and one bending-dominated, are evaluated under identical loading conditions to explore how microstructure-driven design can lead to topology choices that are better suited to accommodate shear or other critical local stress states, thereby enhancing mechanical performance. A strut-level mechanics-based analysis is performed to evaluate shear stress distribution and highlight the role of topology-microstructure synergy and compatibility in determining overall lattice behavior. The findings emphasize the importance of designing structures that are both load-aware and microstructure-responsive, enabling more effective material utilization in advanced engineering applications.
本文讨论了晶格结构的微观结构分析框架,该框架可以映射材料的微观结构响应,以指导拓扑选择和机械性能优化。通过耦合几何拓扑和材料的固有行为,我们展示了各向异性微结构响应如何为优化晶格结构的设计提供信息。为了说明这一概念,我们将重点放在两种不同类别的钛合金上:Ti5553 (Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr wt)%), which exhibits a predominantly β $\beta$ -phase microstructure, and Ti64 (Ti-6Al-4V wt%), which features a dual-phase α + β $\alpha &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;plus;\beta$ structure. These alloys exhibit markedly different mechanical responses under multiaxial loading in “fully dense” solid form. The strut-level stress analysis of these alloys reveals how specific microstructural characteristics can guide the selection of appropriate lattice topologies. Two representative lattice configurations, one stretching-dominated and one bending-dominated, are evaluated under identical loading conditions to explore how microstructure-driven design can lead to topology choices that are better suited to accommodate shear or other critical local stress states, thereby enhancing mechanical performance. A strut-level mechanics-based analysis is performed to evaluate shear stress distribution and highlight the role of topology-microstructure synergy and compatibility in determining overall lattice behavior. The findings emphasize the importance of designing structures that are both load-aware and microstructure-responsive, enabling more effective material utilization in advanced engineering applications.
期刊介绍:
Advanced Engineering Materials is the membership journal of three leading European Materials Societies
- German Materials Society/DGM,
- French Materials Society/SF2M,
- Swiss Materials Federation/SVMT.