{"title":"Wildlife and brucellosis: Integrating conservation efforts with zoonotic disease management in Haixi Prefecture","authors":"HaoNing Wang, XinYa Jiang, GuanYing Ni, FuYun Chen, RenNa Wu, ShiFeng Sui, Xi Chen, XiaoDi Wang, ShaoPeng Yu, XiaoDong Wu, XiaoLong Wang","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Brucellosis, a zoonotic disease caused by <i>Brucella</i> bacteria, poses significant public health risks and economic burdens, especially in ecosystems where livestock and wildlife interact. This study employs a spatial epidemiological approach to investigate the relationship between brucellosis occurrence in humans and livestock and wild ungulate habitats in Haixi Prefecture, Qinghai Province, China. We identified brucellosis hotspots and analyzed their overlap with the distributions of 6 wild ungulate species using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models, which revealed a strong spatial association between high-risk brucellosis areas and habitats of wild ungulates (area under the curve = 0.853–0.935 across low versus high altitude regions). High-risk areas for brucellosis were primarily concentrated in the eastern part of Tianjun County, the northern and central regions of Delingha City, and the western part of Wulan County, coinciding with high relative suitability for wild ungulates. We also identified distinct environmental factors such as precipitation in January (31.9%), diurnal temperature range (28.8%), and elevation (27.7%) as key predictors of the spatial distribution of brucellosis spillover events in low-altitude areas, whereas precipitation in October (49.4%) and land use type (33.0%) dominated in high-altitude zones. However, our analysis does not include direct surveillance or pathogen shedding data from wild ungulates. Consequently, our inference is limited to spatial co-occurrence and interface-related risk rather than demonstrated reservoir status or distribution of brucellosis events. These findings highlight the need for a more integrated approach to disease management and provide a practical framework for applying the One Health approach to policymaking, helping to balance wildlife conservation, livestock management, and public health in high-altitude ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"90 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Brucellosis, a zoonotic disease caused by Brucella bacteria, poses significant public health risks and economic burdens, especially in ecosystems where livestock and wildlife interact. This study employs a spatial epidemiological approach to investigate the relationship between brucellosis occurrence in humans and livestock and wild ungulate habitats in Haixi Prefecture, Qinghai Province, China. We identified brucellosis hotspots and analyzed their overlap with the distributions of 6 wild ungulate species using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models, which revealed a strong spatial association between high-risk brucellosis areas and habitats of wild ungulates (area under the curve = 0.853–0.935 across low versus high altitude regions). High-risk areas for brucellosis were primarily concentrated in the eastern part of Tianjun County, the northern and central regions of Delingha City, and the western part of Wulan County, coinciding with high relative suitability for wild ungulates. We also identified distinct environmental factors such as precipitation in January (31.9%), diurnal temperature range (28.8%), and elevation (27.7%) as key predictors of the spatial distribution of brucellosis spillover events in low-altitude areas, whereas precipitation in October (49.4%) and land use type (33.0%) dominated in high-altitude zones. However, our analysis does not include direct surveillance or pathogen shedding data from wild ungulates. Consequently, our inference is limited to spatial co-occurrence and interface-related risk rather than demonstrated reservoir status or distribution of brucellosis events. These findings highlight the need for a more integrated approach to disease management and provide a practical framework for applying the One Health approach to policymaking, helping to balance wildlife conservation, livestock management, and public health in high-altitude ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.