To release or not to release? A call for caution when considering wildlife reintroductions

IF 2.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Conservation Science and Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-17 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1111/csp2.70337
Héctor Ruiz-Villar, José María Gil-Sánchez, David Álvarez, Andrés Ordiz
{"title":"To release or not to release? A call for caution when considering wildlife reintroductions","authors":"Héctor Ruiz-Villar,&nbsp;José María Gil-Sánchez,&nbsp;David Álvarez,&nbsp;Andrés Ordiz","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a global scenario of biodiversity loss, apex predators and large obligate scavengers are common targets of conservation efforts. Management agencies typically focus on individual species and on immediate actions, seemingly neglecting the holistic and long-term scope that lies at the very core of conservation biology. Conservation actions such as captive breeding and the eventual release of individuals can help species at the brink of extinction to recover. However, they sometimes seem to be the ultimate goal, regardless of the conservation status of the species and bypassing the need to pursue long-term ecosystem recovery. Minimizing the factors that drove species to a threatened status and assessing the ecological and societal impacts of reintroductions should be crucial steps before assuming that reintroductions are a priority. We discuss these issues based on ongoing management programs of several species in the Iberian Peninsula. We propose complementary actions that would promote the recovery of species and, ultimately, ecosystem resilience in the long term. Our concerns may prove useful for many other species and ecosystems on a global scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70337","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a global scenario of biodiversity loss, apex predators and large obligate scavengers are common targets of conservation efforts. Management agencies typically focus on individual species and on immediate actions, seemingly neglecting the holistic and long-term scope that lies at the very core of conservation biology. Conservation actions such as captive breeding and the eventual release of individuals can help species at the brink of extinction to recover. However, they sometimes seem to be the ultimate goal, regardless of the conservation status of the species and bypassing the need to pursue long-term ecosystem recovery. Minimizing the factors that drove species to a threatened status and assessing the ecological and societal impacts of reintroductions should be crucial steps before assuming that reintroductions are a priority. We discuss these issues based on ongoing management programs of several species in the Iberian Peninsula. We propose complementary actions that would promote the recovery of species and, ultimately, ecosystem resilience in the long term. Our concerns may prove useful for many other species and ecosystems on a global scale.

Abstract Image

释放还是不释放?呼吁在考虑重新引入野生动物时要谨慎
在全球生物多样性丧失的情况下,顶级捕食者和大型专性食腐动物是保护工作的共同目标。管理机构通常关注单个物种和立即采取的行动,似乎忽视了保护生物学最核心的整体和长期范围。圈养繁殖和最终释放个体等保护行动可以帮助濒临灭绝的物种恢复。然而,它们有时似乎是最终目标,而不考虑物种的保护状况,并绕过了追求长期生态系统恢复的需要。将导致物种濒危的因素降到最低,并评估重新引入的生态和社会影响,应该是假设重新引入是优先事项之前的关键步骤。我们根据伊比利亚半岛几个物种正在进行的管理计划来讨论这些问题。我们建议采取补充行动,以促进物种的恢复,并最终在长期内提高生态系统的恢复能力。我们的担忧可能对全球范围内的许多其他物种和生态系统有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书