Long-Term Effects of a Dietary Humic Substance–Butyrate Blend, and Yeast Cell Wall on Growth Performance, Immune Status and Gut Microbiota of Juvenile Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus

IF 1.9 Q3 FISHERIES
Abdulmalik A. Oladipupo, Anita M. Kelly, D. Allen Davis, Benjamin H. Beck, Luke A. Roy, Timothy J. Bruce
{"title":"Long-Term Effects of a Dietary Humic Substance–Butyrate Blend, and Yeast Cell Wall on Growth Performance, Immune Status and Gut Microbiota of Juvenile Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus","authors":"Abdulmalik A. Oladipupo,&nbsp;Anita M. Kelly,&nbsp;D. Allen Davis,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Beck,&nbsp;Luke A. Roy,&nbsp;Timothy J. Bruce","doi":"10.1002/aff2.70273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the long-term effects of a dietary humic substance and butyrate blend (HSB) alone or with yeast cell wall (Beta-MOS) in channel catfish. Around 1440 fish (31.31 ± 0.24 g) were distributed among 12 outdoor tanks in a pond-supplied flow-through design. Four dietary treatments were evaluated in triplicate: Diets containing no supplements (control), 2 g kg<sup>−1</sup> of HSB (HSB), 0.5 g kg<sup>−1</sup> of yeast cell wall (BM) or a combination of 1 g kg<sup>−1</sup> HSB and 0.25 g kg<sup>−1</sup> BM (HSB+BM) for 90 days. All growth indices increased over time (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.050); however, diet did not affect growth parameters (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), except for per cent weight gain (PWG) (<i>p</i> = 0.027). PWG differed among treatments after 90 days (<i>p</i> = 0.016), with the HSB yielding 470% PWG compared to 400% in the control (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Serum lysozyme activity was unaffected by dietary treatments (<i>p</i> = 0.128) but varied over time (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with higher activity at 30 days compared to 60 or 90 days (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Target immune genes in the head kidney were not different (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.050). Meanwhile, splenic <i>il1b</i> and <i>tnfa</i> expression varied over time (<i>p</i> = 0.036; <i>p</i> = 0.023), with upregulation at 30 days. Gut microbiome analyses showed treatment effects on richness after 90 days (<i>p</i> = 0.027), while beta diversity was influenced by time rather than treatments. Differential abundance analysis identified opportunistic taxa in the gut after 30 days, followed by commensal colonization at 60 and 90 days. Overall, dietary HSB at 2 g kg<sup>−1</sup> showed growth potential in channel catfish. While 0.5 g kg<sup>−1</sup> of BM did not affect performance, their combination at half inclusion rates yielded comparable growth. Therefore, HSB has the potential to support long-term growth performance while maintaining baseline health performance in commercial catfish aquaculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":100114,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aff2.70273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.70273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the long-term effects of a dietary humic substance and butyrate blend (HSB) alone or with yeast cell wall (Beta-MOS) in channel catfish. Around 1440 fish (31.31 ± 0.24 g) were distributed among 12 outdoor tanks in a pond-supplied flow-through design. Four dietary treatments were evaluated in triplicate: Diets containing no supplements (control), 2 g kg−1 of HSB (HSB), 0.5 g kg−1 of yeast cell wall (BM) or a combination of 1 g kg−1 HSB and 0.25 g kg−1 BM (HSB+BM) for 90 days. All growth indices increased over time (p ≤ 0.050); however, diet did not affect growth parameters (p > 0.05), except for per cent weight gain (PWG) (p = 0.027). PWG differed among treatments after 90 days (p = 0.016), with the HSB yielding 470% PWG compared to 400% in the control (p = 0.011). Serum lysozyme activity was unaffected by dietary treatments (p = 0.128) but varied over time (p < 0.001), with higher activity at 30 days compared to 60 or 90 days (p < 0.001). Target immune genes in the head kidney were not different (p > 0.050). Meanwhile, splenic il1b and tnfa expression varied over time (p = 0.036; p = 0.023), with upregulation at 30 days. Gut microbiome analyses showed treatment effects on richness after 90 days (p = 0.027), while beta diversity was influenced by time rather than treatments. Differential abundance analysis identified opportunistic taxa in the gut after 30 days, followed by commensal colonization at 60 and 90 days. Overall, dietary HSB at 2 g kg−1 showed growth potential in channel catfish. While 0.5 g kg−1 of BM did not affect performance, their combination at half inclusion rates yielded comparable growth. Therefore, HSB has the potential to support long-term growth performance while maintaining baseline health performance in commercial catfish aquaculture.

Abstract Image

饲料中添加腐殖质-丁酸盐混合物和酵母细胞壁对斑点斑点鲶鱼幼鱼生长性能、免疫状态和肠道微生物群的长期影响
本研究评估了饲料中单独添加腐殖质和丁酸盐混合物(HSB)或添加酵母细胞壁(β - mos)对通道鲶鱼的长期影响。约1440条鱼(31.31±0.24 g)分布在12个室外水槽中,采用池塘供应的流道设计。四种饲粮处理分为三组:不添加添加物(对照组)、添加2 g kg - 1 HSB (HSB)、添加0.5 g kg - 1酵母细胞壁(BM)或添加1 g kg - 1 HSB和0.25 g kg - 1 BM (HSB+BM),持续90天。各生长指标均随时间增加而增加(p≤0.050);然而,除增重百分比(PWG) (p = 0.027)外,日粮对生长参数没有影响(p > 0.05)。90天后不同处理的PWG差异(p = 0.016), HSB产生470% PWG,而对照组产生400% PWG (p = 0.011)。血清溶菌酶活性不受饮食处理的影响(p = 0.128),但随着时间的推移而变化(p < 0.001),与60或90天相比,30天的活性更高(p < 0.001)。头肾靶免疫基因差异无统计学意义(p > 0.050)。脾il - 1b和tnfa的表达随时间变化(p = 0.036; p = 0.023),在30天上调。肠道微生物组分析显示,90天后处理对丰富度有影响(p = 0.027),而β多样性受时间而不是处理的影响。差异丰度分析在30天后确定了肠道中的机会性分类群,随后在60和90天进行了共生定植。总体而言,饲料中2 g kg−1的HSB在通道鲶鱼中显示出生长潜力。虽然0.5 g kg - 1的BM不影响性能,但它们在一半包合率下的组合产生了相当的增长。因此,HSB有潜力支持商业鲶鱼养殖的长期生长性能,同时保持基线健康性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书