Technology-enhanced learning environments in Central Asian higher education: A four-study, multi-institutional quasi-experimental research program (N = 945)

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yulduz Asadova
{"title":"Technology-enhanced learning environments in Central Asian higher education: A four-study, multi-institutional quasi-experimental research program (N = 945)","authors":"Yulduz Asadova","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2026.103044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid digital transformation of higher education in Central Asia proceeds despite a scarcity of large-scale, multi-site empirical evidence comparing technology-enhanced learning (TEL) environments with traditional instruction. To address this gap, this study evaluated whether TEL environments improve learning outcomes and student engagement across diverse populations, institutions, and technology layers, and assessed whether these effects scale with the depth of technological integration. Conducted between 2023 and 2026 across five higher education institutions in Uzbekistan (N = 945), the methodology employed four quasi-experimental parallel-group sub-studies. Sub-study 1 (n = 503) compared a Moodle-based methodology against traditional instruction across three pedagogical institutes. Sub-studies 2 (n = 120), 3 (n = 124), and 4 (n = 198) examined progressively integrated TEL approaches at a medical institute, ranging from content–competency blended learning to AI-driven adaptive learning with virtual laboratories, and AI-enhanced analytics with intelligent assessment. Outcomes were measured using expert-validated 100-point standardized scales. Findings indicated that the experimental groups significantly outperformed control groups across all four sub-studies (p &lt; 0.001). Effect sizes increased with depth of TEL integration: from a moderate efficiency gain in Sub-study 1 (η ≈ 1.11) to very large effects in Sub-studies 2–4 (Cohen's d = 1.93–3.29; Hedges' g = 1.88–3.20), with the most pronounced improvements observed in digital literacy and clinical decision-making. Student engagement indicators were also consistently higher in the TEL cohorts. Ultimately, these results demonstrate that TEL environments significantly enhance learning outcomes, with gains scaling alongside technological complexity. The findings support a contextually conditional framework for TEL adoption within credit-modular systems, contingent upon robust infrastructure, faculty readiness, data-governance capacity, and established ethical safeguards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 103044"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035526001151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid digital transformation of higher education in Central Asia proceeds despite a scarcity of large-scale, multi-site empirical evidence comparing technology-enhanced learning (TEL) environments with traditional instruction. To address this gap, this study evaluated whether TEL environments improve learning outcomes and student engagement across diverse populations, institutions, and technology layers, and assessed whether these effects scale with the depth of technological integration. Conducted between 2023 and 2026 across five higher education institutions in Uzbekistan (N = 945), the methodology employed four quasi-experimental parallel-group sub-studies. Sub-study 1 (n = 503) compared a Moodle-based methodology against traditional instruction across three pedagogical institutes. Sub-studies 2 (n = 120), 3 (n = 124), and 4 (n = 198) examined progressively integrated TEL approaches at a medical institute, ranging from content–competency blended learning to AI-driven adaptive learning with virtual laboratories, and AI-enhanced analytics with intelligent assessment. Outcomes were measured using expert-validated 100-point standardized scales. Findings indicated that the experimental groups significantly outperformed control groups across all four sub-studies (p < 0.001). Effect sizes increased with depth of TEL integration: from a moderate efficiency gain in Sub-study 1 (η ≈ 1.11) to very large effects in Sub-studies 2–4 (Cohen's d = 1.93–3.29; Hedges' g = 1.88–3.20), with the most pronounced improvements observed in digital literacy and clinical decision-making. Student engagement indicators were also consistently higher in the TEL cohorts. Ultimately, these results demonstrate that TEL environments significantly enhance learning outcomes, with gains scaling alongside technological complexity. The findings support a contextually conditional framework for TEL adoption within credit-modular systems, contingent upon robust infrastructure, faculty readiness, data-governance capacity, and established ethical safeguards.
中亚高等教育的技术强化学习环境:一项四项研究、多机构准实验研究计划(N = 945)
尽管缺乏将技术增强学习(TEL)环境与传统教学进行比较的大规模、多地点经验证据,但中亚高等教育的快速数字化转型仍在继续。为了解决这一差距,本研究评估了电信环境是否改善了不同人群、机构和技术层的学习成果和学生参与度,并评估了这些影响是否与技术整合的深度相关。该研究于2023年至2026年在乌兹别克斯坦的五所高等教育机构进行(N = 945),采用了四个准实验平行组子研究。子研究1 (n = 503)比较了三个教学机构基于moodle的教学方法与传统教学方法。子研究2 (n = 120)、3 (n = 124)和4 (n = 198)检查了一家医学研究所逐步整合的TEL方法,范围从内容-能力混合学习到人工智能驱动的自适应学习与虚拟实验室,以及人工智能增强分析与智能评估。使用专家验证的100分标准化量表测量结果。研究结果表明,实验组在所有四个子研究中显著优于对照组(p < 0.001)。效应大小随着TEL整合深度的增加而增加:从子研究1的中等效率增加(η≈1.11)到子研究2-4的非常大的效果(Cohen的d = 1.93-3.29; Hedges的g = 1.88-3.20),在数字素养和临床决策方面观察到最显著的改善。TEL组的学生参与度指标也一直较高。最终,这些结果表明,TEL环境显著提高了学习成果,其收益随技术复杂性的增加而增加。研究结果支持在学分模块化系统中采用电信技术的情境条件框架,这取决于强大的基础设施、教师准备、数据治理能力和已建立的道德保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书