Disparities in antenatal care utilization and stillbirth risk among women of other origin than high-income Western countries in Stockholm 2000–2020: A retrospective cohort study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2026-09-15 Epub Date: 2026-07-20 DOI:10.1111/aogs.70310
Minna Lundén, Ingela Hulthén Varli, Helena Kopp Kallner, Hanna Åmark
{"title":"Disparities in antenatal care utilization and stillbirth risk among women of other origin than high-income Western countries in Stockholm 2000–2020: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Minna Lundén,&nbsp;Ingela Hulthén Varli,&nbsp;Helena Kopp Kallner,&nbsp;Hanna Åmark","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Foreign-born women face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, compared to Swedish-born women, and this disparity cannot be fully explained by known risk factors. This study investigates differences in pregnancy-related health care by maternal origin and whether such differences may contribute to disparities in stillbirth risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective cohort study including all singleton births in the Stockholm region between 2000 and 2020 (<i>n</i> = 518 792 births). Data from the National Medical Birth Register was linked to data from Statistics Sweden and the VAL databases using the personal identity number of the mother. Maternal and fetal characteristics, inpatient care occasions, length of hospital stay, outpatient visits, and antenatal care visits were compared between women divided by maternal origin, experiencing live births, and stillbirths. Regression models using a forward selection strategy were performed, adjusting for different potential mediators on the causal pathway from maternal country of origin to stillbirth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among women with live births, those originating from Middle East/Northern Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, and South America had significantly higher proportions of inpatient care occasions than women originating from high-income Western Countries. Women with live births originating from other regions than high-income Western Countries had significantly less antenatal care visits, regardless of parity. Among women with stillbirths, women originating from sub-Saharan Africa had significantly more inpatient care occasions and fewer antenatal care visits than women originating from high-income Western Countries. After adjusting for maternal risk factors, SGA infants, socioeconomic factors, multiple inpatient care occasions, and few antenatal care visits during pregnancy, women from sub-Saharan Africa had a slightly elevated risk of stillbirth (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00–1.66, <i>p</i>-value 0.047) compared to women from high-income Western Countries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Women originating from other regions than high-income Western Countries, especially those from sub-Saharan Africa, attended fewer antenatal care visits and had more inpatient care occasions compared to women from high-income Western Countries. Reduced attendance in antenatal care could potentially be associated with their elevated stillbirth risk. Improving access to and participation in antenatal care should be prioritized to reduce disparities in stillbirth risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"105 10","pages":"2030-2040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13394951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.70310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Foreign-born women face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, compared to Swedish-born women, and this disparity cannot be fully explained by known risk factors. This study investigates differences in pregnancy-related health care by maternal origin and whether such differences may contribute to disparities in stillbirth risk.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study including all singleton births in the Stockholm region between 2000 and 2020 (n = 518 792 births). Data from the National Medical Birth Register was linked to data from Statistics Sweden and the VAL databases using the personal identity number of the mother. Maternal and fetal characteristics, inpatient care occasions, length of hospital stay, outpatient visits, and antenatal care visits were compared between women divided by maternal origin, experiencing live births, and stillbirths. Regression models using a forward selection strategy were performed, adjusting for different potential mediators on the causal pathway from maternal country of origin to stillbirth.

Results

Among women with live births, those originating from Middle East/Northern Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, and South America had significantly higher proportions of inpatient care occasions than women originating from high-income Western Countries. Women with live births originating from other regions than high-income Western Countries had significantly less antenatal care visits, regardless of parity. Among women with stillbirths, women originating from sub-Saharan Africa had significantly more inpatient care occasions and fewer antenatal care visits than women originating from high-income Western Countries. After adjusting for maternal risk factors, SGA infants, socioeconomic factors, multiple inpatient care occasions, and few antenatal care visits during pregnancy, women from sub-Saharan Africa had a slightly elevated risk of stillbirth (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00–1.66, p-value 0.047) compared to women from high-income Western Countries.

Conclusions

Women originating from other regions than high-income Western Countries, especially those from sub-Saharan Africa, attended fewer antenatal care visits and had more inpatient care occasions compared to women from high-income Western Countries. Reduced attendance in antenatal care could potentially be associated with their elevated stillbirth risk. Improving access to and participation in antenatal care should be prioritized to reduce disparities in stillbirth risk.

2000-2020年斯德哥尔摩高收入西方国家以外的其他来源妇女产前保健利用和死产风险的差异:一项回顾性队列研究
与瑞典出生的女性相比,外国出生的女性面临更高的不良妊娠结局风险,包括死产,这种差异不能完全用已知的危险因素来解释。本研究调查了不同母系在妊娠相关保健方面的差异,以及这种差异是否可能导致死产风险的差异。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括2000年至2020年斯德哥尔摩地区的所有单胎出生(n = 518792例出生)。使用母亲的个人身份号码,将国家医疗出生登记册的数据与瑞典统计局和VAL数据库的数据联系起来。根据产妇来源、活产和死产进行分组,比较产妇和胎儿特征、住院治疗次数、住院时间、门诊次数和产前护理次数。使用正向选择策略进行回归模型,调整从母国到死产的因果路径上的不同潜在中介。结果:在活产妇女中,来自中东/北非、撒哈拉以南非洲和南美洲的妇女住院护理的比例明显高于来自高收入西方国家的妇女。不论胎次如何,产自西方高收入国家以外地区的活产妇女的产前检查次数明显减少。在死产妇女中,来自撒哈拉以南非洲的妇女比来自高收入西方国家的妇女有更多的住院护理次数和更少的产前护理。在调整了孕产妇风险因素、SGA婴儿、社会经济因素、多次住院治疗以及妊娠期间很少进行产前检查等因素后,与西方高收入国家的妇女相比,撒哈拉以南非洲妇女的死产风险略高(aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00-1.66, p值0.047)。结论:与西方高收入国家的妇女相比,来自西方高收入国家以外地区的妇女,特别是来自撒哈拉以南非洲的妇女,参加产前保健检查的次数较少,住院护理次数较多。产前护理出勤率降低可能与死产风险升高有关。应优先考虑改善获得和参与产前保健的机会,以缩小死产风险方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书