Alessandro Michielotto, Alvise Finotello, Riccardo A. Mel, Eli D. Lazarus, Luca Carniello, Davide Tognin, Andrea D’Alpaos
{"title":"Reconciling flood-risk reduction and wetland resilience behind coastal floodgates","authors":"Alessandro Michielotto, Alvise Finotello, Riccardo A. Mel, Eli D. Lazarus, Luca Carniello, Davide Tognin, Andrea D’Alpaos","doi":"10.1038/s44221-026-00658-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal urban areas face increasing threats from sea-level rise and extreme weather events. Where population relocation is not feasible, hard-engineering defence measures are adopted to mitigate flooding. However, the implications of such interventions for surrounding coastal ecosystems remain poorly understood. Here we explored the effects of the recently inaugurated Mo.S.E. storm-surge barriers on hydrodynamics and wetland resilience within the Venice Lagoon—a highly anthropized environment that may foreshadow future adaptation in other coastal cities. Our analysis demonstrates that while the floodgates successfully protect urban areas, the barriers presently operate at the expense of wetland ecosystems, reducing tidal inundation and the associated delivery of mineral sediments essential to sustain vertical accretion and maintain elevation with rising sea levels. Comparison with optimized management scenarios shows that subtle adjustments to the timing of floodgate activation can markedly reduce these negative eco-geomorphological impacts, promoting a more sustainable balance between urban flood protection and ecosystem integrity. Coastal urban areas are increasingly threatened by sea-level rise and extreme weather, necessitating hard-engineering solutions such as storm-surge barriers. Here the authors examine the Mo.S.E. barriers in Venice Lagoon, revealing that while they are effective for urban flood protection, they compromise wetland resilience and that optimized management could mitigate these ecological impacts.","PeriodicalId":74252,"journal":{"name":"Nature water","volume":"4 7","pages":"845-856"},"PeriodicalIF":30.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-026-00658-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-026-00658-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coastal urban areas face increasing threats from sea-level rise and extreme weather events. Where population relocation is not feasible, hard-engineering defence measures are adopted to mitigate flooding. However, the implications of such interventions for surrounding coastal ecosystems remain poorly understood. Here we explored the effects of the recently inaugurated Mo.S.E. storm-surge barriers on hydrodynamics and wetland resilience within the Venice Lagoon—a highly anthropized environment that may foreshadow future adaptation in other coastal cities. Our analysis demonstrates that while the floodgates successfully protect urban areas, the barriers presently operate at the expense of wetland ecosystems, reducing tidal inundation and the associated delivery of mineral sediments essential to sustain vertical accretion and maintain elevation with rising sea levels. Comparison with optimized management scenarios shows that subtle adjustments to the timing of floodgate activation can markedly reduce these negative eco-geomorphological impacts, promoting a more sustainable balance between urban flood protection and ecosystem integrity. Coastal urban areas are increasingly threatened by sea-level rise and extreme weather, necessitating hard-engineering solutions such as storm-surge barriers. Here the authors examine the Mo.S.E. barriers in Venice Lagoon, revealing that while they are effective for urban flood protection, they compromise wetland resilience and that optimized management could mitigate these ecological impacts.