Communication Complexity of Exact Sampling Under Rényi Information

IF 2.6 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1109/TIT.2026.3680805
Spencer Hill;Fady Alajaji;Tamás Linder
{"title":"Communication Complexity of Exact Sampling Under Rényi Information","authors":"Spencer Hill;Fady Alajaji;Tamás Linder","doi":"10.1109/TIT.2026.3680805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the problem of exact sampling under an exponential communication cost, specifically Campbell’s average codeword length <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {L(t)}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of order <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {t}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and Rényi’s entropy. We provide a lower bound on the Campbell cost of exact sampling that grows approximately as <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {D_{1/\\alpha }(P||Q)}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, the Rényi divergence of order <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {1/\\alpha }$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {\\alpha = 1 / 1 + t}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Using the Poisson functional representation of Li and El Gamal (2017), we prove an upper bound on <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {L(t)}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> whose leading Rényi divergence term has order within <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {\\epsilon }$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of that of the lower bound. Our results reduce to the bounds of Harsha et al. (2010) as <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {\\alpha \\to 1}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. We also provide numerical examples comparing the bounds in the cases of normal and Laplacian distributions, demonstrating that the upper and lower bounds are typically within 5-10 bits of each other. Our results characterize exactly the optimal asymptotic Campbell cost <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\boldsymbol {L(t)}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> per sample as the number of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples grows to infinity. We show that under the exponential cost, any causal sampler performs strictly worse asymptotically than noncausal samplers. This contrasts with the case of expected message length, where both causal and noncausal samplers have the same optimal asymptotic cost.","PeriodicalId":13494,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","volume":"72 6","pages":"3525-3538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11474561/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the problem of exact sampling under an exponential communication cost, specifically Campbell’s average codeword length $\boldsymbol {L(t)}$ of order $\boldsymbol {t}$ , and Rényi’s entropy. We provide a lower bound on the Campbell cost of exact sampling that grows approximately as $\boldsymbol {D_{1/\alpha }(P||Q)}$ , the Rényi divergence of order $\boldsymbol {1/\alpha }$ , with $\boldsymbol {\alpha = 1 / 1 + t}$ . Using the Poisson functional representation of Li and El Gamal (2017), we prove an upper bound on $\boldsymbol {L(t)}$ whose leading Rényi divergence term has order within $\boldsymbol {\epsilon }$ of that of the lower bound. Our results reduce to the bounds of Harsha et al. (2010) as $\boldsymbol {\alpha \to 1}$ . We also provide numerical examples comparing the bounds in the cases of normal and Laplacian distributions, demonstrating that the upper and lower bounds are typically within 5-10 bits of each other. Our results characterize exactly the optimal asymptotic Campbell cost $\boldsymbol {L(t)}$ per sample as the number of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples grows to infinity. We show that under the exponential cost, any causal sampler performs strictly worse asymptotically than noncausal samplers. This contrasts with the case of expected message length, where both causal and noncausal samplers have the same optimal asymptotic cost.
rsamnyi信息下精确采样的通信复杂度
我们研究了指数级通信成本下的精确采样问题,特别是阶为$\boldsymbol {t}$的Campbell平均码字长度$\boldsymbol {L(t)}$和rsamunyi熵。我们提供了精确抽样的Campbell成本的下界,它近似地增长为$\boldsymbol {D_{1/\alpha }(P||Q)}$,阶的r nyi散度$\boldsymbol {1/\alpha }$,与$\boldsymbol {\alpha = 1 / 1 + t}$。使用Li和El Gamal(2017)的泊松函数表示,我们证明了$\boldsymbol {L(t)}$上的上界,其先导r nyi发散项在$\boldsymbol {\epsilon }$内的阶与下界的阶相同。我们的结果降低到Harsha et al.(2010)的边界为$\boldsymbol {\alpha \to 1}$。我们还提供了数值例子,比较了正态分布和拉普拉斯分布的边界,证明了上界和下界通常在彼此的5-10位内。我们的结果准确地描述了当独立和同分布(i.i.d)样本的数量增长到无穷大时,每个样本的最优渐近坎贝尔成本$\boldsymbol {L(t)}$。我们证明了在指数成本下,任何因果抽样器的渐近性能都严格差于非因果抽样器。这与期望消息长度的情况形成对比,其中因果和非因果采样器具有相同的最优渐近代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
514
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Information Theory is a journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers concerned with the transmission, processing, and utilization of information. The boundaries of acceptable subject matter are intentionally not sharply delimited. Rather, it is hoped that as the focus of research activity changes, a flexible policy will permit this Transactions to follow suit. Current appropriate topics are best reflected by recent Tables of Contents; they are summarized in the titles of editorial areas that appear on the inside front cover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书