From List-Decodability to Proximity Gaps

IF 2.6 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1109/TIT.2026.3679739
Yiwen Gao;Dongliang Cai;Yang Xu;Haibin Kan
{"title":"From List-Decodability to Proximity Gaps","authors":"Yiwen Gao;Dongliang Cai;Yang Xu;Haibin Kan","doi":"10.1109/TIT.2026.3679739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proximity testing for linear codes is a fundamental problem in coding theory with critical applications in cryptographic protocols, blockchain, and distributed storage systems. This work addresses the proximity gaps for linear codes, a crucial aspect for efficiently verifying whether a batch of words is close to a given code. We present a general framework for deriving proximity gaps from the list-decodability properties of the underlying linear code. Our main result show that for any <inline-formula> <tex-math>$(p,L)$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-list-decodable code <inline-formula> <tex-math>$C\\subseteq \\mathbb {F}_{q}^{n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> with minimum relative distance <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Delta _{C}\\gt p$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, the probability that a random combination of a batch of <inline-formula> <tex-math>$t$ </tex-math></inline-formula> words containing a <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-far word (for <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\delta \\le 1-\\sqrt {1-p+\\varepsilon }$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) remains <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-far from <inline-formula> <tex-math>$C$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is bounded by <inline-formula> <tex-math>$O\\left ({{\\frac {tL^{2}pn}{q}+\\frac {t}{\\varepsilon q}}}\\right)$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. This result also establishes a form of (mutual) correlated agreement for linear codes, which can be used to strengthen soundness analyses in protocols that rely on proximity testing, thereby reducing query complexity and enabling practical instantiations over smaller finite fields. In particular, we apply our main result to randomly punctured Reed–Solomon codes and folded Reed–Solomon codes—both of which are known to achieve list-decodability up to capacity—and derive linear proximity gaps for these families of codes under the Johnson bound.","PeriodicalId":13494,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","volume":"72 6","pages":"3809-3819"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11460274/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proximity testing for linear codes is a fundamental problem in coding theory with critical applications in cryptographic protocols, blockchain, and distributed storage systems. This work addresses the proximity gaps for linear codes, a crucial aspect for efficiently verifying whether a batch of words is close to a given code. We present a general framework for deriving proximity gaps from the list-decodability properties of the underlying linear code. Our main result show that for any $(p,L)$ -list-decodable code $C\subseteq \mathbb {F}_{q}^{n}$ with minimum relative distance $\Delta _{C}\gt p$ , the probability that a random combination of a batch of $t$ words containing a $\delta $ -far word (for $\delta \le 1-\sqrt {1-p+\varepsilon }$ ) remains $\delta $ -far from $C$ is bounded by $O\left ({{\frac {tL^{2}pn}{q}+\frac {t}{\varepsilon q}}}\right)$ . This result also establishes a form of (mutual) correlated agreement for linear codes, which can be used to strengthen soundness analyses in protocols that rely on proximity testing, thereby reducing query complexity and enabling practical instantiations over smaller finite fields. In particular, we apply our main result to randomly punctured Reed–Solomon codes and folded Reed–Solomon codes—both of which are known to achieve list-decodability up to capacity—and derive linear proximity gaps for these families of codes under the Johnson bound.
从列表可解码性到邻近间隙
线性码的接近测试是编码理论中的一个基本问题,在密码学协议、区块链和分布式存储系统中有着重要的应用。这项工作解决了线性代码的接近差距,这是有效验证一批单词是否接近给定代码的关键方面。我们提出了一个从底层线性代码的列表可解码属性中推导接近间隙的一般框架。我们的主要结果表明,对于任何 $(p,L)$ -list-可解码代码 $C\subseteq \mathbb {F}_{q}^{n}$ 相对距离最小 $\Delta _{C}\gt p$ ,随机组合一批的概率 $t$ 含有a的单词 $\delta $ 远的;远的 $\delta \le 1-\sqrt {1-p+\varepsilon }$ ) $\delta $ -离得远 $C$ 的边界是 $O\left ({{\frac {tL^{2}pn}{q}+\frac {t}{\varepsilon q}}}\right)$ . 该结果还为线性代码建立了一种(相互)相关协议的形式,可用于加强依赖于接近测试的协议中的可靠性分析,从而降低查询复杂性并在较小的有限域上实现实际实例。特别地,我们将我们的主要结果应用于随机穿孔的Reed-Solomon码和折叠的Reed-Solomon码,这两种编码都可以达到最大程度的列表可解码性,并在Johnson界下推导出这些编码族的线性邻近间隙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
514
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Information Theory is a journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers concerned with the transmission, processing, and utilization of information. The boundaries of acceptable subject matter are intentionally not sharply delimited. Rather, it is hoped that as the focus of research activity changes, a flexible policy will permit this Transactions to follow suit. Current appropriate topics are best reflected by recent Tables of Contents; they are summarized in the titles of editorial areas that appear on the inside front cover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书