Multi-omics dissection of mode-specific growth–defence reprogramming to insect herbivores in Populus hopeiensis

IF 5.1 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Current Plant Biology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cpb.2026.100643
Qi Zhang, Shaobin Zhang, Ning Wang, Yue Bai
{"title":"Multi-omics dissection of mode-specific growth–defence reprogramming to insect herbivores in Populus hopeiensis","authors":"Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Shaobin Zhang,&nbsp;Ning Wang,&nbsp;Yue Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.cpb.2026.100643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How woody perennials coordinate growth–defence reprogramming in response to herbivores with contrasting feeding modes remains insufficiently understood. Here, we integrated transcriptomic, metabolomic, and volatilomic analyses to compare the responses of <em>Populus hopeiensis</em> to chewing herbivory and piercing–sucking herbivory. Chewing and piercing–sucking treatments induced both shared and distinct defence-associated responses. Short-term chewing herbivory was associated with rapid transcriptional reprogramming towards defence, including jasmonate- and ethylene-related signalling, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, phenylpropanoid/flavonoid metabolism, and repression of photosynthesis-related functions. In contrast, the 19 h piercing–sucking treatment was associated with broader transcriptomic and metabolic restructuring, particularly involving lipid- and amino acid-related pathways. Metabolomic data further indicated that chewing herbivory was more closely linked to phenylpropanoid- and flavonoid-associated metabolite changes, whereas piercing–sucking herbivory induced a wider metabolic response. Volatilomic profiling, which was performed only for the chewing treatments, identified characteristic volatile organic compound (VOC) changes, and co-expression analysis highlighted several WRKY and MYB transcription factors as candidate regulatory hubs. Overall, these results provide a multi-omics view of herbivory-associated growth–defence reprogramming in <em>P. hopeiensis</em> and identify candidate genes and pathways for future functional studies of insect resistance in woody plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38090,"journal":{"name":"Current Plant Biology","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100643"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214662826000654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How woody perennials coordinate growth–defence reprogramming in response to herbivores with contrasting feeding modes remains insufficiently understood. Here, we integrated transcriptomic, metabolomic, and volatilomic analyses to compare the responses of Populus hopeiensis to chewing herbivory and piercing–sucking herbivory. Chewing and piercing–sucking treatments induced both shared and distinct defence-associated responses. Short-term chewing herbivory was associated with rapid transcriptional reprogramming towards defence, including jasmonate- and ethylene-related signalling, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, phenylpropanoid/flavonoid metabolism, and repression of photosynthesis-related functions. In contrast, the 19 h piercing–sucking treatment was associated with broader transcriptomic and metabolic restructuring, particularly involving lipid- and amino acid-related pathways. Metabolomic data further indicated that chewing herbivory was more closely linked to phenylpropanoid- and flavonoid-associated metabolite changes, whereas piercing–sucking herbivory induced a wider metabolic response. Volatilomic profiling, which was performed only for the chewing treatments, identified characteristic volatile organic compound (VOC) changes, and co-expression analysis highlighted several WRKY and MYB transcription factors as candidate regulatory hubs. Overall, these results provide a multi-omics view of herbivory-associated growth–defence reprogramming in P. hopeiensis and identify candidate genes and pathways for future functional studies of insect resistance in woody plants.
hopeiensis的模式特异性生长防御重编程对昆虫食草动物的多组学分析
木本多年生植物如何协调生长防御重编程以应对食草动物与不同的摄食模式仍然没有得到充分的了解。本研究综合转录组学、代谢组学和挥发物学分析,比较了胡杨对咀嚼草食和刺吸草食的反应。咀嚼和穿刺吸吮治疗诱导了共同的和不同的防御相关反应。短期咀嚼草食与防御的快速转录重编程有关,包括茉莉酸和乙烯相关信号,丝裂原激活蛋白激酶(MAPK)级联,苯丙素/类黄酮代谢,以及光合作用相关功能的抑制。相比之下,19 h穿刺-吸吮处理与更广泛的转录组学和代谢重组有关,特别是涉及脂质和氨基酸相关途径。代谢组学数据进一步表明,咀嚼草食与苯丙素和类黄酮相关的代谢物变化联系更紧密,而刺吸草食则引起更广泛的代谢反应。仅在咀嚼处理下进行的挥发性分析确定了挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的特征变化,并通过共表达分析突出了几种WRKY和MYB转录因子作为候选调控中心。总的来说,这些结果提供了一个多组学的视角来研究寄草相关的生长防御重编程,并为未来木本植物抗虫功能研究确定了候选基因和途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Plant Biology
Current Plant Biology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
32
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Current Plant Biology aims to acknowledge and encourage interdisciplinary research in fundamental plant sciences with scope to address crop improvement, biodiversity, nutrition and human health. It publishes review articles, original research papers, method papers and short articles in plant research fields, such as systems biology, cell biology, genetics, epigenetics, mathematical modeling, signal transduction, plant-microbe interactions, synthetic biology, developmental biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, biotechnologies, bioinformatics and plant genomic resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书