Two nudges, one goal: Promoting animal welfare in a virtual supermarket

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Leonie Bach, Monika Hartmann, Nina Weingarten
{"title":"Two nudges, one goal: Promoting animal welfare in a virtual supermarket","authors":"Leonie Bach,&nbsp;Monika Hartmann,&nbsp;Nina Weingarten","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2026.102608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite widespread concern for animal welfare, a gap persists between consumers' attitudes and their purchasing behaviour. To address this discrepancy, our study examined various nudging strategies within a simulated, two-dimensional virtual supermarket in Germany. Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we assessed the effectiveness of a social norm nudge, an information nudge and a combination of both, while also exploring the mediating role of descriptive normative beliefs. Our results reveal significant main effects for both nudges, but no interaction effect. This suggests that each nudge independently increased the rate of purchasing products with higher animal welfare standards. Although the combined nudge condition resulted in the largest overall impact, the effects were additive rather than super-additive. Additionally, while participants generally held high levels of descriptive normative beliefs, the social norm nudge did not further elevate these beliefs. Nonetheless, participants with higher descriptive normative beliefs tended to purchase more products with higher animal welfare standards. The study findings emphasise the need for a nuanced understanding of how combined nudging strategies impact purchasing behaviour in supermarkets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 102608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite widespread concern for animal welfare, a gap persists between consumers' attitudes and their purchasing behaviour. To address this discrepancy, our study examined various nudging strategies within a simulated, two-dimensional virtual supermarket in Germany. Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we assessed the effectiveness of a social norm nudge, an information nudge and a combination of both, while also exploring the mediating role of descriptive normative beliefs. Our results reveal significant main effects for both nudges, but no interaction effect. This suggests that each nudge independently increased the rate of purchasing products with higher animal welfare standards. Although the combined nudge condition resulted in the largest overall impact, the effects were additive rather than super-additive. Additionally, while participants generally held high levels of descriptive normative beliefs, the social norm nudge did not further elevate these beliefs. Nonetheless, participants with higher descriptive normative beliefs tended to purchase more products with higher animal welfare standards. The study findings emphasise the need for a nuanced understanding of how combined nudging strategies impact purchasing behaviour in supermarkets.
两个推动,一个目标:在虚拟超市中促进动物福利
尽管人们普遍关注动物福利,但消费者的态度和购买行为之间仍然存在差距。为了解决这一差异,我们的研究在德国的一个模拟的二维虚拟超市中检查了各种推动策略。采用2 × 2受试者间设计,我们评估了社会规范助推、信息助推以及两者结合的有效性,同时也探索了描述性规范性信念的中介作用。我们的研究结果表明,两种推力都有显著的主效应,但没有交互效应。这表明,每一次推动都独立地增加了购买动物福利标准更高的产品的比例。虽然组合助推条件的总体影响最大,但其影响是可加性的,而不是超可加性的。此外,虽然参与者普遍持有较高水平的描述性规范性信念,但社会规范的推动并没有进一步提升这些信念。然而,具有较高描述性规范性信念的参与者倾向于购买更多具有较高动物福利标准的产品。研究结果强调,需要细致入微地了解综合推动策略如何影响超市的购买行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书