{"title":"Two nudges, one goal: Promoting animal welfare in a virtual supermarket","authors":"Leonie Bach, Monika Hartmann, Nina Weingarten","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2026.102608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite widespread concern for animal welfare, a gap persists between consumers' attitudes and their purchasing behaviour. To address this discrepancy, our study examined various nudging strategies within a simulated, two-dimensional virtual supermarket in Germany. Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we assessed the effectiveness of a social norm nudge, an information nudge and a combination of both, while also exploring the mediating role of descriptive normative beliefs. Our results reveal significant main effects for both nudges, but no interaction effect. This suggests that each nudge independently increased the rate of purchasing products with higher animal welfare standards. Although the combined nudge condition resulted in the largest overall impact, the effects were additive rather than super-additive. Additionally, while participants generally held high levels of descriptive normative beliefs, the social norm nudge did not further elevate these beliefs. Nonetheless, participants with higher descriptive normative beliefs tended to purchase more products with higher animal welfare standards. The study findings emphasise the need for a nuanced understanding of how combined nudging strategies impact purchasing behaviour in supermarkets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 102608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite widespread concern for animal welfare, a gap persists between consumers' attitudes and their purchasing behaviour. To address this discrepancy, our study examined various nudging strategies within a simulated, two-dimensional virtual supermarket in Germany. Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we assessed the effectiveness of a social norm nudge, an information nudge and a combination of both, while also exploring the mediating role of descriptive normative beliefs. Our results reveal significant main effects for both nudges, but no interaction effect. This suggests that each nudge independently increased the rate of purchasing products with higher animal welfare standards. Although the combined nudge condition resulted in the largest overall impact, the effects were additive rather than super-additive. Additionally, while participants generally held high levels of descriptive normative beliefs, the social norm nudge did not further elevate these beliefs. Nonetheless, participants with higher descriptive normative beliefs tended to purchase more products with higher animal welfare standards. The study findings emphasise the need for a nuanced understanding of how combined nudging strategies impact purchasing behaviour in supermarkets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.