Istvan A. Urban, Sándor Farkasdi, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Monica Lopez, Fernando Muñoz, Gabor Varga, Mauricio G. Araujo, Fabio Vignoletti
{"title":"Effect of Membrane Perforations With and Without Collagen Membrane Coverage in Vertical Ridge Augmentation: An Experimental Pilot In Vivo Study","authors":"Istvan A. Urban, Sándor Farkasdi, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Monica Lopez, Fernando Muñoz, Gabor Varga, Mauricio G. Araujo, Fabio Vignoletti","doi":"10.1111/clr.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Given the proposed bioactive role of collagen membranes, we aimed to evaluate whether the perforation size of titanium-reinforced dPTFE membranes, with or without an additional collagen membrane, influences outcomes of vertical alveolar ridge augmentation (VARA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In 12 beagle dogs (24 sites), standardized bilateral chronic mandibular ridge defects (8 × 30 mm) were created and healed for 12 weeks. Sites were randomized (1:1:1) to VARA using porcine xenograft covered with either: (i) non-perforated titanium-reinforced dPTFE (NON-PERF), (ii) perforated titanium-reinforced dPTFE (PERF), or (iii) perforated titanium-reinforced dPTFE covered by a collagen membrane (PERF+CM). After 16 weeks, specimens underwent micro-CT, histology/histomorphometry, vessel quantification, and immunohistochemistry (OCN, ALP, VEGF, TRAP). Continuous outcomes were summarized as medians and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc testing when applicable; inflammatory cell scores were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 24 treated sites, four had complications and were excluded. All remaining sites achieved around 60% new bone area with no significant intergroup differences (new bone <i>p</i> = 0.5047; soft tissue <i>p</i> = 0.2994; residual graft <i>p</i> = 0.9689). Linear vertical gain was comparable (medians 2.33, 2.87, 2.74 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.7119). Micro-CT outcomes did not differ (e.g., BV/TV, <i>p</i> = 0.2739). Ordinal models did not show significant group differences in inflammatory scores; plasma cell scores in PERF+CM versus control were borderline (OR 15.61; <i>p</i> = 0.0587).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Perforated dPTFE membranes yielded comparable bone gain to unperforated dPTFE. Adding a collagen membrane over perforated dPTFE did not improve VARA outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"37 10","pages":"1158-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.70157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Given the proposed bioactive role of collagen membranes, we aimed to evaluate whether the perforation size of titanium-reinforced dPTFE membranes, with or without an additional collagen membrane, influences outcomes of vertical alveolar ridge augmentation (VARA).
Materials and Methods
In 12 beagle dogs (24 sites), standardized bilateral chronic mandibular ridge defects (8 × 30 mm) were created and healed for 12 weeks. Sites were randomized (1:1:1) to VARA using porcine xenograft covered with either: (i) non-perforated titanium-reinforced dPTFE (NON-PERF), (ii) perforated titanium-reinforced dPTFE (PERF), or (iii) perforated titanium-reinforced dPTFE covered by a collagen membrane (PERF+CM). After 16 weeks, specimens underwent micro-CT, histology/histomorphometry, vessel quantification, and immunohistochemistry (OCN, ALP, VEGF, TRAP). Continuous outcomes were summarized as medians and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc testing when applicable; inflammatory cell scores were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression (α = 0.05).
Results
Of 24 treated sites, four had complications and were excluded. All remaining sites achieved around 60% new bone area with no significant intergroup differences (new bone p = 0.5047; soft tissue p = 0.2994; residual graft p = 0.9689). Linear vertical gain was comparable (medians 2.33, 2.87, 2.74 mm; p = 0.7119). Micro-CT outcomes did not differ (e.g., BV/TV, p = 0.2739). Ordinal models did not show significant group differences in inflammatory scores; plasma cell scores in PERF+CM versus control were borderline (OR 15.61; p = 0.0587).
Conclusions
Perforated dPTFE membranes yielded comparable bone gain to unperforated dPTFE. Adding a collagen membrane over perforated dPTFE did not improve VARA outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.