From Mice to Moths: Practical Reasons for Considering Animal Welfare in Research.

Jessica Cait, Aileen MacLellan, Sarah J J Adcock, Meghan Barrett
{"title":"From Mice to Moths: Practical Reasons for Considering Animal Welfare in Research.","authors":"Jessica Cait, Aileen MacLellan, Sarah J J Adcock, Meghan Barrett","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-26-039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considering animal welfare in research is an important part of ethical professional practice. However, not all animal species are covered by welfare legislation, resulting in less consideration for currently unprotected groups. While ethical arguments for protecting animal welfare are commonly debated, practical arguments have received less attention. Here, we review literature from vertebrate laboratory animals, demonstrating practical benefits to welfare consideration by highlighting the links between animal welfare and (1) improving scientific outcomes; (2) maintaining public support for research; and (3) reducing occupational stress. We then extend these practical arguments to the invertebrate research context. Using mammals as the focal taxa for vertebrates and insects as the focal taxa for invertebrates, we show how research suggests that researchers working with some invertebrate taxa may similarly benefit from the consideration of animal welfare. Together, this literature provides evidence that considering animal welfare may facilitate scientific progress across taxa. We close with practical guidance for researchers working with plausibly sentient taxa on how to incorporate animal welfare considerations into their scientific practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-26-039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering animal welfare in research is an important part of ethical professional practice. However, not all animal species are covered by welfare legislation, resulting in less consideration for currently unprotected groups. While ethical arguments for protecting animal welfare are commonly debated, practical arguments have received less attention. Here, we review literature from vertebrate laboratory animals, demonstrating practical benefits to welfare consideration by highlighting the links between animal welfare and (1) improving scientific outcomes; (2) maintaining public support for research; and (3) reducing occupational stress. We then extend these practical arguments to the invertebrate research context. Using mammals as the focal taxa for vertebrates and insects as the focal taxa for invertebrates, we show how research suggests that researchers working with some invertebrate taxa may similarly benefit from the consideration of animal welfare. Together, this literature provides evidence that considering animal welfare may facilitate scientific progress across taxa. We close with practical guidance for researchers working with plausibly sentient taxa on how to incorporate animal welfare considerations into their scientific practice.

从老鼠到飞蛾:在研究中考虑动物福利的实际原因。
在研究中考虑动物福利是伦理专业实践的重要组成部分。然而,并不是所有的动物物种都受到福利立法的保护,导致对目前未受保护的群体的考虑较少。虽然保护动物福利的道德论点经常被争论,但实际的论点却很少受到关注。在这里,我们回顾了脊椎动物实验动物的文献,通过强调动物福利与(1)提高科学成果之间的联系,展示了福利考虑的实际好处;(2)维持公众对研究的支持;(3)减轻职业压力。然后,我们将这些实际的论点扩展到无脊椎动物的研究背景。利用哺乳动物作为脊椎动物的焦点分类群,昆虫作为无脊椎动物的焦点分类群,我们展示了研究如何表明,研究一些无脊椎动物分类群的研究人员同样可以从考虑动物福利中获益。总之,这些文献提供的证据表明,考虑动物福利可能促进跨分类群的科学进步。最后,我们为研究人员提供了实用的指导,指导他们如何将动物福利考虑纳入他们的科学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书