Quadriceps Muscle Morphology as a Marker of Performance Across Multiple Strength and Power Tests.

IF 1.9 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-18 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tsm2/7599813
Davi A G Mázala, Daniel F McLaughlin, Matheus B Guerrero, Líbyna T C Martins, Andrea T Barton, Marcel B Lanza
{"title":"Quadriceps Muscle Morphology as a Marker of Performance Across Multiple Strength and Power Tests.","authors":"Davi A G Mázala, Daniel F McLaughlin, Matheus B Guerrero, Líbyna T C Martins, Andrea T Barton, Marcel B Lanza","doi":"10.1155/tsm2/7599813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies demonstrated that measures of muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI) show an association with functional tests, but results have been inconsistent. The aim of the current cross-sectional study was to determine which muscle from the quadriceps (QUAD) (i.e., vastus lateralis [VL], rectus femoris [RF], or vastus intermedius [VI]) and ultrasound measurements (i.e., MT and EI) better explain three different physical assessments: maximal isometric knee extension torque (MIVT), vertical jump peak power (VJPP), and lower limb muscle power (LLMP). Forty-three adults (23 women) participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants' body composition, ultrasound measurements from the dominant leg, and functional outcomes were evaluated on the same visit. Bivariate analyses indicated moderate to strong positive associations between all physical assessments and muscle morphology variables, supporting the use of multiple regression analyses. Also, given the multicollinearity among EI measures, a global EI index was generated and used in the multiple regression analyses. The multiple regression analysis showed that MIVT was independently associated with RF MT (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and global EI (<i>p</i> = 0.004), with the model explaining 63.5% of the variance. For VJPP, RF MT was the only variable that significantly contributed to the model (<i>p</i> = 0.041), explaining 61.9% of the variance. Lastly, LLMP was independently associated with RF MT (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and VI MT (<i>p</i> = 0.010), and the model explained 63.0% of the variance. Overall, these findings suggest that RF MT may be the most informative QUAD ultrasound measure for explaining performance in our data set. This is particularly important in clinical and research settings in which reducing testing time, participant burden, and analytic complexity can improve feasibility without substantially compromising the relevance of the evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":"2026 ","pages":"7599813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13379945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tsm2/7599813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that measures of muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI) show an association with functional tests, but results have been inconsistent. The aim of the current cross-sectional study was to determine which muscle from the quadriceps (QUAD) (i.e., vastus lateralis [VL], rectus femoris [RF], or vastus intermedius [VI]) and ultrasound measurements (i.e., MT and EI) better explain three different physical assessments: maximal isometric knee extension torque (MIVT), vertical jump peak power (VJPP), and lower limb muscle power (LLMP). Forty-three adults (23 women) participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants' body composition, ultrasound measurements from the dominant leg, and functional outcomes were evaluated on the same visit. Bivariate analyses indicated moderate to strong positive associations between all physical assessments and muscle morphology variables, supporting the use of multiple regression analyses. Also, given the multicollinearity among EI measures, a global EI index was generated and used in the multiple regression analyses. The multiple regression analysis showed that MIVT was independently associated with RF MT (p = 0.009) and global EI (p = 0.004), with the model explaining 63.5% of the variance. For VJPP, RF MT was the only variable that significantly contributed to the model (p = 0.041), explaining 61.9% of the variance. Lastly, LLMP was independently associated with RF MT (p = 0.003) and VI MT (p = 0.010), and the model explained 63.0% of the variance. Overall, these findings suggest that RF MT may be the most informative QUAD ultrasound measure for explaining performance in our data set. This is particularly important in clinical and research settings in which reducing testing time, participant burden, and analytic complexity can improve feasibility without substantially compromising the relevance of the evaluation.

股四头肌形态作为多项力量和力量测试表现的标志。
先前的研究表明,肌肉厚度(MT)和回声强度(EI)的测量显示与功能测试有关,但结果不一致。当前横断研究的目的是确定股四头肌(QUAD)中的哪块肌肉(即股外侧肌[VL],股直肌[RF]或股中间肌[VI])和超声测量(即MT和EI)更好地解释三种不同的物理评估:最大等距膝关节伸展扭矩(MIVT),垂直跳跃峰值功率(VJPP)和下肢肌肉功率(LLMP)。43名成年人(23名女性)参加了这项横断面研究。在同一次访问中评估参与者的身体组成、主腿超声测量和功能结果。双变量分析表明,所有身体评估和肌肉形态变量之间存在中度至强烈的正相关,支持多元回归分析的使用。此外,考虑到EI测度之间的多重共线性,生成了一个全局EI指数,并将其用于多元回归分析。多元回归分析显示,MIVT与RF MT (p = 0.009)和global EI (p = 0.004)独立相关,该模型解释了63.5%的方差。对于VJPP, RF MT是唯一对模型有显著贡献的变量(p = 0.041),解释了61.9%的方差。最后,LLMP与RF MT (p = 0.003)和VI MT (p = 0.010)独立相关,该模型解释了63.0%的方差。总的来说,这些发现表明射频MT可能是我们数据集中解释性能的最具信息性的QUAD超声测量。这在临床和研究环境中尤其重要,因为减少测试时间、参与者负担和分析复杂性可以提高可行性,而不会实质性地损害评估的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书