Explainable Machine Learning for Risk Prediction of Reduced Quality of Life in Hypertension.

IF 3.2 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Health and Risk Management Pub Date : 2026-07-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S614061
Sri Andala, Muhammad Iqhrammullah, Agusri Agusri, Bryan Gervais De Liyis, Derren D C H Rampengan, Starry Homenta Rampengan, Farrah Fahdhienie, Muhammad Habiburrahman
{"title":"Explainable Machine Learning for Risk Prediction of Reduced Quality of Life in Hypertension.","authors":"Sri Andala, Muhammad Iqhrammullah, Agusri Agusri, Bryan Gervais De Liyis, Derren D C H Rampengan, Starry Homenta Rampengan, Farrah Fahdhienie, Muhammad Habiburrahman","doi":"10.2147/VHRM.S614061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with hypertension are at risk to reduced quality of life (QoL). Explainable machine learning (ML) can be used for domain-specific risk stratification and prioritization of modifiable determinants of low QoL.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To train ML classifier algorithms for QoL risk stratification in hypertension, where meaningful determinants were explored through Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from hypertensive individuals (n = 534) completed WHOQOL BREF, Quick Physical Activity Rating, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale 8, and standardized questionnaires for acceptance and knowledge were analyzed utilizing Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, Random Forest, and Naive Bayes ML classifiers. The trained ML algorithms were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation, where the stability was examined using rank-based metrics. SHAP were applied to the gradient boosting, as the most stable model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For physical QoL, Random Forest (AUC 0.850; sensitivity 0.835; specificity 0.738) and Gradient Boosting (AUC 0.850; sensitivity 0.801; specificity 0.764) showed good reduced QoL identification. For psychological domain, best classifications were obtained from Gradient Boosting performed best (AUC 0.833; sensitivity 0.818; specificity 0.651) and XGBoost (AUC 0.831; sensitivity 0.824; specificity 0.660), with the former observed as the most stable SHAP analysis identified acceptance and medication adherence as the dominant shared drivers of risk across both QoL domains. Physical QoL risk was further influenced by physical activity-related factors, whereas Psychological QoL risk showed additional contributions from age and educational attainment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ensemble tree-based classifiers, particularly Gradient Boosting, had the most optimal performance in discriminating reduced and good QoL. Acceptance and medication adherence are the most influential shared drivers of risk, while physical activity, age, and educational attainment contributed to domain-specific heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23597,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","volume":"22 ","pages":"614061"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13380243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S614061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with hypertension are at risk to reduced quality of life (QoL). Explainable machine learning (ML) can be used for domain-specific risk stratification and prioritization of modifiable determinants of low QoL.

Objective: To train ML classifier algorithms for QoL risk stratification in hypertension, where meaningful determinants were explored through Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).

Methods: Data from hypertensive individuals (n = 534) completed WHOQOL BREF, Quick Physical Activity Rating, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale 8, and standardized questionnaires for acceptance and knowledge were analyzed utilizing Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, Random Forest, and Naive Bayes ML classifiers. The trained ML algorithms were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation, where the stability was examined using rank-based metrics. SHAP were applied to the gradient boosting, as the most stable model.

Results: For physical QoL, Random Forest (AUC 0.850; sensitivity 0.835; specificity 0.738) and Gradient Boosting (AUC 0.850; sensitivity 0.801; specificity 0.764) showed good reduced QoL identification. For psychological domain, best classifications were obtained from Gradient Boosting performed best (AUC 0.833; sensitivity 0.818; specificity 0.651) and XGBoost (AUC 0.831; sensitivity 0.824; specificity 0.660), with the former observed as the most stable SHAP analysis identified acceptance and medication adherence as the dominant shared drivers of risk across both QoL domains. Physical QoL risk was further influenced by physical activity-related factors, whereas Psychological QoL risk showed additional contributions from age and educational attainment.

Conclusion: Ensemble tree-based classifiers, particularly Gradient Boosting, had the most optimal performance in discriminating reduced and good QoL. Acceptance and medication adherence are the most influential shared drivers of risk, while physical activity, age, and educational attainment contributed to domain-specific heterogeneity.

可解释的机器学习用于高血压患者生活质量降低的风险预测。
背景:高血压患者存在生活质量降低的风险。可解释的机器学习(ML)可用于特定领域的风险分层和低生活质量的可修改决定因素的优先级。目的:训练用于高血压患者生活质量风险分层的ML分类算法,其中通过Shapley加性解释(SHAP)探索有意义的决定因素。方法:采用决策树、梯度增强、XGBoost、AdaBoost、随机森林和朴素贝叶斯ML分类器对534例高血压患者(n = 534)完成WHOQOL BREF、Quick Physical Activity Rating、Morisky药物依从性量表8和标准化接受度和知识问卷的数据进行分析。使用分层10倍交叉验证对训练好的ML算法进行评估,其中使用基于等级的指标检查稳定性。SHAP作为最稳定的梯度增压模型。结果:对于物理QoL, Random Forest (AUC 0.850,灵敏度0.835,特异性0.738)和Gradient Boosting (AUC 0.850,灵敏度0.801,特异性0.764)具有较好的降低QoL鉴定效果。在心理领域,Gradient Boosting (AUC 0.833,灵敏度0.818,特异性0.651)和XGBoost (AUC 0.831,灵敏度0.824,特异性0.660)的分类效果最好,其中前者是最稳定的,SHAP分析发现,接受度和药物依从性是两个QoL领域风险的主要共同驱动因素。身体生活质量风险进一步受到身体活动相关因素的影响,而心理生活质量风险则受到年龄和受教育程度的额外影响。结论:基于集成树的分类器,特别是梯度增强分类器,在鉴别低质量和良好质量方面具有最优的性能。接受和药物依从性是最具影响力的风险共享驱动因素,而身体活动、年龄和受教育程度则对特定领域的异质性有贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular Health and Risk Management
Vascular Health and Risk Management PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies on the processes involved in the maintenance of vascular health; the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of vascular disease and its sequelae; and the involvement of metabolic disorders, particularly diabetes. In addition, the journal will also seek to define drug usage in terms of ultimate uptake and acceptance by the patient and healthcare professional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书