Deconstructing Pharmaceutical Prices in a Government-Controlled Market: A Hedonic Regression Analysis of B2G Procurement in Thailand.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2026-07-17 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329261471004
Jittakorn Thila, Piriya Pholphirul
{"title":"Deconstructing Pharmaceutical Prices in a Government-Controlled Market: A Hedonic Regression Analysis of B2G Procurement in Thailand.","authors":"Jittakorn Thila, Piriya Pholphirul","doi":"10.1177/11786329261471004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rising pharmaceutical expenditure poses a persistent governance challenge for public health systems in low- and middle-income countries, yet empirical evidence on pricing in Business-to-Government (B2G) settings remains scarce. This scarcity reflects a fundamental constraint where administrative procurement records are rarely accessible for independent analysis. This study addresses that gap by exploiting rare access to 26,652 medication transaction records from Thailand's Comptroller General's Department (CGD) for 2019-2024. Using acute pain medications, a semi-logarithmic hedonic regression decomposes price variation into product-level and institutional-level determinants. Internal product characteristics, including pharmacological class, dosage form, formulation technology, and brand status, account for the majority of price variation. Conventional market mechanisms, such as competitive pressure and procurement volume, generate no meaningful price reduction once product composition is controlled. Institutional governance factors, however, are associated with significant residual effects. Hospitals under non-Ministry of Public Health ministries are associated with price premiums of 13-29% for equivalent products, while Government Pharmaceutical Organization procurement is associated with a 9.6% price reduction. These findings indicate that product characteristics are the dominant drivers of pharmaceutical price variation in B2G markets, while institutional governance factors are associated with residual price differences after controlling for product composition. These residual differences may have relevant implications for procurement practices in fragmented public health systems. Note on causal inference: All reported associations are based on observational cross-sectional data and should not be interpreted as evidence of causal relationships. The regression coefficients reflect conditional correlations between procurement prices and their covariates, controlling for observed product and institutional characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"19 ","pages":"11786329261471004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13379651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329261471004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising pharmaceutical expenditure poses a persistent governance challenge for public health systems in low- and middle-income countries, yet empirical evidence on pricing in Business-to-Government (B2G) settings remains scarce. This scarcity reflects a fundamental constraint where administrative procurement records are rarely accessible for independent analysis. This study addresses that gap by exploiting rare access to 26,652 medication transaction records from Thailand's Comptroller General's Department (CGD) for 2019-2024. Using acute pain medications, a semi-logarithmic hedonic regression decomposes price variation into product-level and institutional-level determinants. Internal product characteristics, including pharmacological class, dosage form, formulation technology, and brand status, account for the majority of price variation. Conventional market mechanisms, such as competitive pressure and procurement volume, generate no meaningful price reduction once product composition is controlled. Institutional governance factors, however, are associated with significant residual effects. Hospitals under non-Ministry of Public Health ministries are associated with price premiums of 13-29% for equivalent products, while Government Pharmaceutical Organization procurement is associated with a 9.6% price reduction. These findings indicate that product characteristics are the dominant drivers of pharmaceutical price variation in B2G markets, while institutional governance factors are associated with residual price differences after controlling for product composition. These residual differences may have relevant implications for procurement practices in fragmented public health systems. Note on causal inference: All reported associations are based on observational cross-sectional data and should not be interpreted as evidence of causal relationships. The regression coefficients reflect conditional correlations between procurement prices and their covariates, controlling for observed product and institutional characteristics.

解构政府控制市场中的药品价格:泰国B2G采购的享乐回归分析。
不断上升的药品支出对低收入和中等收入国家的公共卫生系统构成了持续的治理挑战,但关于企业对政府(B2G)定价的经验证据仍然很少。这种稀缺性反映了行政采购记录很少可供独立分析的基本限制。本研究通过对泰国总审计署(CGD) 2019-2024年26,652份药品交易记录的罕见访问来解决这一差距。使用急性疼痛药物,半对数享乐回归将价格变化分解为产品水平和制度水平的决定因素。产品的内部特征,包括药理学类别、剂型、配方技术和品牌地位,是价格变化的主要原因。传统的市场机制,如竞争压力和采购量,一旦控制了产品构成,就不会产生有意义的降价。然而,制度治理因素与显著的剩余效应相关。非公共卫生部下属医院同等产品的价格溢价为13-29%,而政府制药组织的采购与价格降低9.6%有关。研究结果表明,产品特征是B2G市场药品价格变化的主要驱动因素,而制度治理因素在控制产品成分后与剩余价格差异相关。这些剩余差异可能对分散的公共卫生系统的采购实践产生相关影响。关于因果推论的说明:所有报告的关联都是基于观察的横断面数据,不应被解释为因果关系的证据。回归系数反映了采购价格与其协变量之间的条件相关性,控制了观察到的产品和制度特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书