Safety and Feasibility of a Patient-Centered Same-Day Polypectomy Referral System: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-18 DOI:10.1007/s10620-026-10109-2
Seung Yong Shin, Min-Jae Kim, Jae Jun Park, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Youn, Hyojin Park
{"title":"Safety and Feasibility of a Patient-Centered Same-Day Polypectomy Referral System: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Seung Yong Shin, Min-Jae Kim, Jae Jun Park, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Youn, Hyojin Park","doi":"10.1007/s10620-026-10109-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colon polypectomy is often performed on a separate day following screening colonoscopy, necessitating repeat bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We implemented a novel same-day polypectomy referral system to improve patient convenience and evaluated its clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction compared with conventional elective polypectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients referred for colon polypectomy at a tertiary center between July and December 2017. Polyp characteristics, bowel preparation quality, procedural outcomes, and complications were compared. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 patients were included (same-day polypectomy, n = 57; elective polypectomy, n = 55). The number and location of resected polyps were comparable between groups. Polyps in the same-day group were significantly smaller (6.3 ± 3.2 mm vs. 10.9 ± 8.7 mm, P < 0.001), and bowel preparation quality was lower (mean BBPS 6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 8.4 ± 1.0, P < 0.001). No procedure-related complications occurred in either group. Among respondents, 95% reported satisfaction with the same-day system, most commonly due to avoidance of repeat bowel preparation (71.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The same-day polypectomy referral pathway appeared feasible in carefully selected patients with non-complex colorectal polyps and was associated with high satisfaction among questionnaire respondents. Lower bowel preparation quality in the same-day group should be considered when interpreting the findings, and the modest sample size precludes definitive conclusions regarding safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5582-5591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10109-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colon polypectomy is often performed on a separate day following screening colonoscopy, necessitating repeat bowel preparation.

Aims: We implemented a novel same-day polypectomy referral system to improve patient convenience and evaluated its clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction compared with conventional elective polypectomy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients referred for colon polypectomy at a tertiary center between July and December 2017. Polyp characteristics, bowel preparation quality, procedural outcomes, and complications were compared. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a questionnaire.

Results: A total of 112 patients were included (same-day polypectomy, n = 57; elective polypectomy, n = 55). The number and location of resected polyps were comparable between groups. Polyps in the same-day group were significantly smaller (6.3 ± 3.2 mm vs. 10.9 ± 8.7 mm, P < 0.001), and bowel preparation quality was lower (mean BBPS 6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 8.4 ± 1.0, P < 0.001). No procedure-related complications occurred in either group. Among respondents, 95% reported satisfaction with the same-day system, most commonly due to avoidance of repeat bowel preparation (71.8%).

Conclusion: The same-day polypectomy referral pathway appeared feasible in carefully selected patients with non-complex colorectal polyps and was associated with high satisfaction among questionnaire respondents. Lower bowel preparation quality in the same-day group should be considered when interpreting the findings, and the modest sample size precludes definitive conclusions regarding safety.

以患者为中心的当日息肉切除转诊系统的安全性和可行性:单中心经验。
背景:结肠息肉切除术通常在筛查结肠镜检查后的另一天进行,需要重复肠准备。目的:我们实施了一种新的当天息肉切除术转诊系统,以提高患者的便利性,并评估其临床结果和患者满意度与传统择期息肉切除术的比较。方法:我们回顾性分析了2017年7月至12月在三级中心转诊的结肠息肉切除术患者的前瞻性数据库。比较息肉特征、肠准备质量、手术结果和并发症。使用问卷评估患者满意度。结果:共纳入112例患者(当日息肉切除术57例,择期息肉切除术55例)。两组间切除息肉的数量和位置具有可比性。同日组的息肉明显小(6.3±3.2 mm vs. 10.9±8.7 mm) P结论:在精心挑选的非复杂结直肠息肉患者中,同日息肉切除术转诊途径是可行的,并且问卷调查的受访者满意度高。在解释研究结果时应考虑当天组肠道准备质量较低,并且适度的样本量排除了关于安全性的明确结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书